05-18-2015, 09:30 PM
|
|
Unvaxxed Pureblood
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Zion aka TEXAS
Posts: 26,763
|
|
Re: Revising Pentecostal history: 1908-1912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo
I would suggest there is a lot of false doctrine that someone can believe and be saved, so long as it is not false doctrine in regard tot he nature, person, and work of Jesus Christ. Those areas are dangerous ground.
For example the Bible tells us we MUST believe Jesus was human (strongly indicates we must believe He was divine), we must believe He is the Son of God, the Messiah, and the Savior. We must believe He died for our sins and we must believe that he rose from the grave the third day. Those things are spelled out. Also there are abundant warning about "in" that will keep us from entering the Kingdom of God in 1 Corinthians 6, Galatians 5, Ephesians 5, Colossians 3, Revelation 21, Romans 1, et al.
However "false doctrine " such as whether one is pre-trib, post-trib, mid trib (and someone is wrong, thus in "false doctrine), whether one is amillenial, premillenian, or post millenial (and someone is wrong), various views on the practice of baptism (and someone is wrong) tongues, standards, tithing, orignal sin, creation theories, etc.
I doubt any of us are as doctrinally pure as we think.
|
Can you give us the scriptures that support the idea that, apart from correct beliefs about the person and work of Christ, " lots of false doctrine" can be believed without being damnable?
|