Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 06-20-2007, 12:12 PM
Chan
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thumper View Post
I have wondered the same thing Elder. I suspect that if it is so the reason that we don't know of it is because it is not the kind of thing that you stand and testify about.

"Bless God, God delivered me from ...."

The social stigma attached to it precludes a lot of people from testifying about it.
Is it social stigma or is it the evil in the hearts of so-called "Christians" who will continue to treat that person as if God had not delivered him - like some here are advocating?
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 06-20-2007, 12:16 PM
HeavenlyOne HeavenlyOne is offline
Lofty, Scientific, and Literal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan View Post
It's in your statement, "I, too, don't trust church people in general."
That doesn't mean I treat them with distrust.

Also, you are taking my statement out of context as well. Key word......general.

It's a general statement, meaning no specifics are mentioned.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
My Countdown Counting down to: My world crashing to the ground.
Is this what being 40 is all about???
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 06-20-2007, 12:26 PM
Chan
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne View Post
That doesn't mean I treat them with distrust.
To fail to trust them is to treat them with distrust because you are withholding your trust from them.

Quote:
Also, you are taking my statement out of context as well. Key word......general.
No, I took it in its context and it is still reflective of an attitude of the heart.

Quote:
It's a general statement, meaning no specifics are mentioned.
A general statement made in the context of a thread that was originally about homosexuals but that ignorant people here have changed to include pedophiles.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 06-20-2007, 01:04 PM
HeavenlyOne HeavenlyOne is offline
Lofty, Scientific, and Literal


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan View Post
To fail to trust them is to treat them with distrust because you are withholding your trust from them.
The Bible doesn't command me to trust everyone. I have to love everyone, but I don't have to trust them. I can love them and not trust them.

Quote:
No, I took it in its context and it is still reflective of an attitude of the heart.
Ah, so you are the expert on the attitude of my heart.....

Quote:
A general statement made in the context of a thread that was originally about homosexuals but that ignorant people here have changed to include pedophiles.
I'm not one of those people.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
My Countdown Counting down to: My world crashing to the ground.
Is this what being 40 is all about???
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 06-20-2007, 01:53 PM
Chan
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne View Post
The Bible doesn't command me to trust everyone. I have to love everyone, but I don't have to trust them. I can love them and not trust them.
Distrust is not an act of love.



Quote:
Ah, so you are the expert on the attitude of my heart.....
It doesn't take an expert to know that what you had said was indeed reflective of an attitude of the heart.



Quote:
I'm not one of those people.
I didn't say you were!
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 06-20-2007, 01:57 PM
Subdued's Avatar
Subdued Subdued is offline
Getting to know Jesus


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan View Post
Distrust is not an act of love.



It doesn't take an expert to know that what you had said was indeed reflective of an attitude of the heart.



I didn't say you were!
Isn't it possible to love a person whom you don't trust?
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 06-20-2007, 03:51 PM
OP_Carl OP_Carl is offline
arbitrary subjective label


 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fifth Brick Ranch on the left.
Posts: 1,640
Chan goes down in flames

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by OP_Carl
And use caution. Watch them to see if they are truly allowing God to change them.
So, you're saying that they can never really be welcomed into the body of Christ? Where does the BIBLE say you have to do this? I get so sick of the evil hearts in so many Christians today that insist on NOT TRUSTING GOD TO CHANGE SINNERS!!!!
I’m not sure where you’re coming from, here. Christianity has a problem with too much acceptance of sin, and not enough excommunication. Not the other way around.

Quote:
Quote:
I agree that we should reach out to homosexuals, and that they can be saved.
I doubt that you agree because of what you said at the beginning of your post!
At least this helps me to understand you a little better.


Quote:
Quote:
Old patterns die hard.
Yes, and you obviously don't trust God to break the pattern. Another old pattern that dies hard is the sinful nature that every human has. Should we all be going around watching each other to make sure that we're all "allowing" God to change us (as if He needs our permission)?
Yes.


Quote:
The mainstream presentation of homosexuals is that of witty, successful, and monogamous people.

Many do present themselves that way, just as many heterosexuals do.

The truth is a little more seedy.

Just like for heterosexuals.
Where? The mainstream of our society and our media glorify the first, and actively seek to discredit the institutions of the second.

Quote:
Quote:
Homosexuals have a greater propensity for multiple partners and child predation than do heterosexuals.
What PROOF do you have of this? Where is the evidence that there are more children molested by adults of the same sex than by adults of the opposite sex? Also, if it's prepubescent children being molested then the perpetrators are not of either heterosexual or homosexual orientation, they are of pedophile orientation, meaning that they have a sexual/romantic attraction to prepubescent children.
The statistics are uncovered in The marketing of evil by David Kupelian. I recommend it.

The population of child molesters has a higher percentage of homosexuals than the population at large. If a person is a homosexual, they are statistically more likely to consider pedophilia or pederasty than a heterosexual.

Quote:
Quote:
I'm not making a blanket statement
No, just evil unsubstantiated statements (your statement "Watch them to see if they are truly allowing God to change them" was evil because it is saying that it doesn't matter what God does in their lives, we're never going to trust them).
I’ve been called a lot of things in my 35 years, but this is the first time I’ve been called evil. I would not have much use for a pastor or church that take no interest in the spiritual development of new converts.

Quote:
Quote:
just suggesting there is greater risk.
Nonsense!!!! You clearly don't have a clue what you're talking about.
How do the hollering of 'nonsense' and accusations of cluelessness help prove your point and disprove mine?

Quote:
NEITHER HETEROSEXUALS NOR HOMOSEXUALS ARE ATTRACTED TO PREPUBESCENT CHILDREN, PEDOPHILES ARE!!!!
I am attempting to address this, above, and will do so a little more later on.

Quote:
Quote:
Cross-dressers and transvestites, usually homosexual, present an especially pernicious problem. They might be dressed as a woman, or have the body of a woman, but there in the ladies room they are looking at your little daughter with a man's eyes. How are you going to deal with that?
Cross-dressers ARE transvestites! More proof that you don't know what you're talking about. And if it's a man dressed as a woman in the ladies room looking at someone's teen daughter with a man's eyes, the man is a heterosexual (like a great many cross-dressers).
Transsexuals. I used the wrong word. It’s a good thing you were ready to jump in here and point that out for me.

Quote:
Quote:
I know there is not a simple solution. But just as I believe that we shouldn't send children into physical battle in the U.S. Army, I believe that we shouldn't send children into spiritual battle either.
The solution is simple: repent of the wickedness that is in your heart, let God be God, and receive into His body those whom He has forgiven!
You are one fun dude! Let’s talk about children, harm to children, and negligence:

Quote:
Churches should have plans in place to deal with this, in the interest of protecting the children and the corporate liability for crimes that take place on church property where negligence can be proved.

Don't give me that "protecting the children" garbage!!!! You're basically saying that even though God forgives certain sinners we will continue to treat them as if they're still in their sin and as if God has not forgiven them! This attitude of yours is just plain evil because you slap God in the face and say to Him, "You can forgive anyone you want but don't expect us to treat them as forgiven."
:
Are you going to sacrifice your children's safety, health, purity, and possible future salvation in the interests of not offending a sexual deviant? In the interests of not interrupting their spiritual journey, hoping that this season of repentance will be the final one?

Translation: it doesn't matter that God has forgiven their sin and started a healing work in them, our job is to treat them with contempt and suspicion, never really welcoming them into the body of Christ.

There is a reason child molesters are stealthy and secretive: they know that even Holy-Ghost-filled preachers can become stone-cold triggermen when they find out somebody has been messing with their kids.

You do realize that this thread is about HOMOSEXUALS and NOT PEDOPHILES, don't you?
Here is the trouble:

1) You are either unaware or unwilling to acknowledge that there is a good deal of overlap between the two categories of homosexuals and pedophiles.

2) You don’t place sufficient priority on protecting children already in the congregation, and preserving their innocence.

3) You don’t understand that your church can be litigated out of existence if a molestation takes place on the church property. You have not been exposed to the concepts of risk evaluation and management.

4) You have responded as though this topic presses a hot button for you. I recommend you take a breather and take a second glance. You’ll be better served by calm and objectivity.

5) I suspect that you have bought into the world’s view of alternative lifestyles, and possibly even have bought into some of the propaganda pushed by the homosexual activists themselves. They want our children. Be fervent for Jesus, not gay rights.


I hope you don't mind my making some assumptions about you in this list. You certainly have made some assumptions about me!

If the building catches on fire, it’s over quickly, one way or another. But sexual abuse is passed from one generation to the next in endless cycles. Today’s child victims are tomorrow’s adult abusers. Preventing abuse prevents obstacles to salvation from forming in multiple generations. It is deeply disconcerting to find you think that protecting the children is garbage. Matthew 18:6

The courts will find the leadership of the church negligent and therefore liable for harm done to children in the church, when reasonable precautions aren’t taken. By extension, all the responsible adults are morally culpable when this happens. I believe God sees it this way. Even the courts do.


I haven't said, nor will I, that I am in favor of ostracization of homosexuals.
My position isn't based on hatred for homosexuals. It is based on the unparalleled love a man has for his children. And it is based on empathy for my brothers and sisters, whom I presume also love their children.

Don't be a sheep. Be a sheepdog.
__________________
Engineering solutions for theological problems.

Despite today's rising cost of living, it remains popular.

"It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried." - Sir Winston Churchill

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." - Sir Winston Churchill

"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." - Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 06-21-2007, 09:34 AM
Chan
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subdued View Post
Isn't it possible to love a person whom you don't trust?
No.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 06-21-2007, 09:37 AM
Subdued's Avatar
Subdued Subdued is offline
Getting to know Jesus


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan View Post
No.
I disagree.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 06-21-2007, 09:51 AM
MissBrattified's Avatar
MissBrattified MissBrattified is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subdued View Post
Isn't it possible to love a person whom you don't trust?
Of course it is. I love my children dearly, but I don't always trust them to make good judgment calls or to do the right thing, because their maturity is lacking. So I supervise them and edit their decisions as necessary. My trust in them will grow over time, and if they violate they trust with bad decisions, or lying or whatever else, then they will have to work to regain it. In the meantime, I love them completely, in spite of their faults. But I would be stupid to trust them implicitly.

Likewise with other people...love them, but trust them? No way. Trust and love are not synonymous. There are folks who I might place trust in business-wise, because they are credible and have a good reputation, such as a bank or accountant, but I don't "love" them. I do place trust in them. If they were to lose my funds or squander my money, I would no longer trust them and would place my money elsewhere.

Simple enough concept, really.
__________________
"God, send me anywhere, only go with me. Lay any burden on me, only sustain me. And sever any tie in my heart except the tie that binds my heart to Yours."
--David Livingstone


"To see no being, not God’s or any, but you also go thither,
To see no possession but you may possess it—enjoying all without labor or purchase—
abstracting the feast, yet not abstracting one particle of it;…."

--Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, Song of the Open Road
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
People I'd Like to Meet From AFF Rico Fellowship Hall 164 06-10-2007 10:05 PM
Anyone know these people? pulling a SH here.. ILuvFPC Fellowship Hall 0 04-26-2007 11:35 PM
People are something else! Rico Fellowship Hall 2 04-24-2007 06:15 PM
Why don't People believe they will prophecy ? Joelel Deep Waters 22 04-18-2007 02:44 PM
Little People CC1 Fellowship Hall 8 03-21-2007 12:34 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by coksiw

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.