The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post

Originally Posted by Old Paths

Not necessarily speaking for Elder Epley, but..

Tired as in tired of so called Apostolic folks defending trinity doctrine.

Tired as in tired of so called Apostolic folks bashing ANY standard that an Apostolic pastor preaches.

Tired as in tired of so called Apostolics bashing a pastor in a New York second, but at the same time revere church hoppers and reprobates.

Tired as in tired of hearing so called Apostolics praise the TBN crowd for their wonderful spirit while over looking their perverted life styles.

Yeah it makes my Tired Hurt.

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Yep that kind of tired.
Jakes-Osteen-Hinn-etc. celebrated to the moon and the majority of Apostolic preachers placed on the level is Osama. It is tiring.

Tired... yes that is most definately the word.

[StMark]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Since St. Mark is gone we can now reveal the REAL reason the Cons have left are rarely post...............

















Because they tired of all the newsflashes and gossip.

That sure is cold Renda
now that StM is gone ???

[Apocrypha]

Originally Posted by Old Paths

Not necessarily speaking for Elder Epley, but..

Tired as in tired of so called Apostolic folks defending trinity doctrine.

Tired as in tired of so called Apostolic folks bashing ANY standard that an Apostolic pastor preaches.

Tired as in tired of so called Apostolics bashing a pastor in a New York second, but at the same time revere church hoppers and reprobates.

Tired as in tired of hearing so called Apostolics praise the TBN crowd for their wonderful spirit while over looking their perverted life styles.

Yeah it makes my Tired Hurt.

I haven't yet seen anyone really stand up and defend Nicene or Cappodian Trinitarism... occasionally there will be some semi-Arian stuff .. but thats just because Modalistic Monarchism has its flaws too.

Many of the liberals will defend principles and the fact that people will derive convictions from their principles. There are clear cut yes and no issues... but some of it is cultural and its ok to lump it in that category.

Both the libs and cons have their heros and what not. I gladly called someone a false teacher and he would be considered a ultra-con ... i've seen folks like Kenneth Phillips and Sam Smith of the AWCF get thrown under the bus by Cons.. suck it up and realize that my hero is your villian and vice versa.

As far as I know none of the major posters here are into TBN style seed faith teachings, nor do they push a extreme Word of Faith viewpoint. Thats a tried old scarecrow arguement that cons can take a whack at. Update your illustrations, they may have more impact. Tons of UPCI pastors are getting ready to go on local access cable and even network cable soon (some are waiting for the front runners to get shot first so they can slip in when its safe)

You don't hear us whining about how rough the "legalists" are do you? Then don't take a swipe at the "libertines" and how corrosive they are to your world view since they are willing to push back intellectually.

[Maple Leaf]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Yep that kind of tired.
Jakes-Osteen-Hinn-etc. celebrated to the moon and the majority of Apostolic preachers placed on the level is Osama. It is tiring.

To be fair.

An Apostolic preacher was vilified on CAF, and defended on AFF.

I have never seen the low level of conversation quoted from CAF allowed on AFF.

[mizpeh]

Originally Posted by BroBallard

Tired... yes that is most definately the word.

You only have 27 posts!

How can you be tired?

[Apocrypha]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Yep that kind of tired.
Jakes-Osteen-Hinn-etc. celebrated to the moon and the majority of Apostolic preachers placed on the level is Osama. It is tiring.

I said the Lakewood based "motivational gospel" is false and distorted in my local preaching here at church... so no that doesn't reflect factual reality. Hinn has zero credibility, and Jakes is iffy at best. Thats the flaw of cons, they setup a strawman by telling us what we believe, even if we don't believe it, and then feel heroic taking a swing at it.

[Old Paths]

Originally Posted by Maple Leaf

To be fair.

An Apostolic preacher was vilified on CAF, and defended on AFF.

I have never seen the low level of conversation quoted from CAF allowed on AFF.

If you didn't read the thread on CAF, you really have a skewed view of the subject.

[mizpeh]

Originally Posted by erikwebster

I haven't yet seen anyone really stand up and defend Nicene or Cappodian Trinitarism... occasionally there will be some semi-Arian stuff .. but thats just because Modalistic Monarchism has its flaws too.

Many of the liberals will defend principles and the fact that people will derive convictions from their principles. There are clear cut yes and no issues... but some of it is cultural and its ok to lump it in that category.

Both the libs and cons have their heros and what not. I gladly called someone a false teacher and he would be considered a ultra-con ... i've seen folks like Kenneth Phillips and Sam Smith of the AWCF get thrown under the bus by Cons.. suck it up and realize that my hero is your villian and vice versa.

As far as I know none of the major posters here are into TBN style seed faith teachings, nor do they push a extreme Word of Faith viewpoint. Thats a tried old scarecrow arguement that cons can take a whack at. Update your illustrations, they may have more impact. Tons of UPCI pastors are getting ready to go on local access cable and even network cable soon (some are waiting for the front runners to get shot first so they can slip in when its safe)

You don't hear us whining about how rough the "legalists" are do you? Then don't take a swipe at the "libertines" and how corrosive they are to your world view since they are willing to push back intellectually.

I thought JG was working with you to "improve" your style of in -your- face posting to exhibiting a more reasoned, brotherly approach?

WHAT HAPPENED????

[StMark]

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

Really? Which principles support these standards:

* Women must wear their hair up.
* No red dresses.
* No shaving legs or armpits. (Rule for women.)
* Don't wear underwear--they're just short pants.
* No shoes that show your toes.
* No pantyhose.
* Don't go without pantyhose.
* Only wear pantyhose with seams.
* Do NOT wear pantyhose with seams.

??????? And that's just the TIP of that iceberg.

So can you provide a supporting biblical principle for each of those?

What's your point Ms B I've heard most of those preached
but been quite a few years - I think that the pastors then
were really sincere maybe carried somethings too far I've
heard some pretty outrageous things not making
fun Epley but you know it's true LOL we all laugh about it now.

[Old Paths]

Originally Posted by erikwebster

I haven't yet seen anyone really stand up and defend Nicene or Cappodian Trinitarism... occasionally there will be some semi-Arian stuff .. but thats just because Modalistic Monarchism has its flaws too.

Many of the liberals will defend principles and the fact that people will derive convictions from their principles. There are clear cut yes and no issues... but some of it is cultural and its ok to lump it in that category.

Both the libs and cons have their heros and what not. I gladly called someone a false teacher and he would be considered a ultra-con ... i've seen folks like Kenneth Phillips and Sam Smith of the AWCF get thrown under the bus by Cons.. suck it up and realize that my hero is your villian and vice versa.

As far as I know none of the major posters here are into TBN style seed faith teachings, nor do they push a extreme Word of Faith viewpoint. Thats a tried old scarecrow arguement that cons can take a whack at. Update your illustrations, they may have more impact. Tons of UPCI pastors are getting ready to go on local access cable and even network cable soon (some are waiting for the front runners to get shot first so they can slip in when its safe)

You don't hear us whining about how rough the "legalists" are do you? Then don't take a swipe at the "libertines" and how corrosive they are to your world view since they are willing to push back intellectually.

You are sooooo funny.