Clinton Is the Best Choice For the Unborn:

[n david]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Trump is a suspect and will have his hearing in December. I can't see anyone being willing to vote for a man until they see how the trial goes.

1) Trump is not a suspect. He was not arrested, nor is he the subject of a law enforcement investigation. 2) He is the defendant in a CIVIL lawsuit, not a criminal trial.

Do your homework and get the facts straight.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Jesus rode a donkey....

Dumb. D U M B

Libs and their memes. They use and value memes more than the constitution.

[Jason B]

Originally Posted by Aquila

The Republicans want to repeal Obamacare. That will repeal the provision that prevents insurers from denying pregnant women coverage on the grounds that pregnancy is a "pre-existing condition". Now, the blood thirsty Republican churls will do this while professing that they are "prolife", a lie from the pit of Hell that smells like smoke. Guess what will happen as millions of women find themselves unable to qualify for health insurance for prenatal care and delivery costs??? Any idiot can tell you that vast numbers of those women will opt for a $200 abortion.

No little girl says, "Mommy, I wanna have an abortion when I grow up." Women chose abortion when they feel desperate and when society isn't addressing the issues they face.

The Republicans will profess to be prolife all day long to get your vote.... but after being elected they spend their time smoking rich cigars soaked in the blood of children, as the laugh at how easy it is to manipulate religious voters.

Chris this is total garbage. It's not about little girls wanting to have an abortion when they grow up, its about people having sex with anyone they hook up with for the night, weekend, on occasion, off and on, and not wanting to live with the inconvenient consequences.

Essentially any pregnant woman can easily get medicare for the pregnancy, and automatically keep it for 2 years. There are PLENTY of people who will adopt, especially newborns. There's no good reason to have an abortion, but a supposed lack of coverage is simply a convenient excuse.

I've got to say, I'm appalled and disgusted by your stance and defense of abortion, while claiming to be pro life.

Not only that, but I'm shocked and disappointed, because you really are a smart guy, and I enjoy your input on a variety of threads.

And its not even a political thing, its a moral thing. I can't stand Trump, and yes there are some phony, corrupt, immoral republicans (i've never seen one worse than Trump, but theres others too).....but that said, Republicans as a party HAVE attempted to do something on this issue. Democrats have only worked to make it easier, more convenient, and more legal to kill babies, and turn a blind eye to anything that might awaken their consciouses, such as the planned parenthood expose videos.

And you DEFEND this? You defend a woman who says its ok to kill a baby full term? You defend a party that supports planned parenthood, gay marriage, and all manner of moral vice? A party that cut God out of their platform, and boo'd Him at their convention for good measure. A people who supported Wendy David in her fillibuster here in Texas than chanted "Satan,Satan" while pro life people prayed at the Texas Capitol and sung "amazing grace". That's who you cast your lot with? That's what you defend? And do so in the name of Christ?

Appalling.

[Jason B]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Sadly, the greatest pressure to abort comes from Republicans.... not Democrats. Consider this....

This cartoon is downright stupid. Do you think everyone on welfare is a democrat? You think anyone voting republican fits this image? I'm a republican (as far as voting record goes), and I wholly support welfare for people who need it. People like your mom, while she was working, many people I've worked with in the grocery business. During my childhood, i was in a home when we had food stamps (back in the day when they were paper). In early adulthood, I was able to get some help, though it was minimal ($17/month food stamps), when I really needed more, and was working full time at $6.70/hr with 2 small children.

I have no problem, zero, with people on welfare who work but don't make enough. Thats what welfare is for.

I can't stand it when lazy people who can't hold a job get welfare. I can't stand when illegals get tons of welfare and struggling working Americans can't. I've worked in and supervised grocery stores the last 18 years. I've seen tons of what looks like food stamp and TANF abuse. We used to have a system that showed remaining balance. I've seen people stock up on meat, I'm talking $300 on meat, not hamburger, rib eye, t-bone, pork loin, premium meats, and then have a remaining balance of over $900. This is so common, when someone comes with a overflowing buggy of meat, and all manner of things, you almost know its Lone Star card (food stamps). And most of the time it is.

I've seen people multiple times pull money out of TANF accounts (cash that has to be withdrawn at a food stamp location). I give them the cash, they should be buying diapers or other necessities, and often seen them buy cigarettes, sometimes beer, sometimes make up. I've never seen someone pull money out of TANF and not use it for something that seems senseless. That's not to say that's how everyone uses the system, but it is common.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Sorry, but the Democrats are in bed with corporate America. You are just unwilling to see it. Get back to the Constitution.

I think Democrats often cave in to corporate America. But corporate America owns the Republican Party.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Sorry, but the Democrats are in bed with corporate America. You are just unwilling to see it. Get back to the Constitution.

You mentioned the Constitution, and one cannot mention the Constitution without mentioning our founders. Most don't realize the level of distrust our founding fathers had for corporations. Consider that the following limitations were put on corporations and lasted until about the mid 1800's before they began to come under serious assault from corporate powers:

◾Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.
◾Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.
◾Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.
◾Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.
◾Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.
◾Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.

Which out of the Democratic Party or the Republican Party would even remotely entertain any of these limitations?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

1) Trump is not a suspect. He was not arrested, nor is he the subject of a law enforcement investigation. 2) He is the defendant in a CIVIL lawsuit, not a criminal trial.

Do your homework and get the facts straight.

I've got the facts straight. I used the wrong terminology. Thanks for the correction. He is the "Defendant" in a civil lawsuit involving child rape allegations.

But, if guilty, does that make anything better?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

Dumb. D U M B

Libs and their memes. They use and value memes more than the constitution.

And conservatives never use memes do they? lol

[n david]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Now your boy Trump.... his a pedophile, a child rapist who not only belongs in prison, but in general population.... just to ensure that he gets what's coming to him. He's scheduled to go to a pretrial hearing on the charges in December. I can't wait to see what happens! If their is true justice, the man will be put away for the violent sexual brutality he inflicted on a 13 year old girl on more than four occasions.

Deleting emails is nothing compared to raping a 13 year old girl. And I'm willing to wager.... she's not the only one.

So, yes. I support a politician who has been cleared of criminal charges. Others support a suspected pedophile-child-rapist who is about to face charges. Let's see if he how he fares after the pretrial hearing in December. If he goes down for child rape.... it will speak volumes about the lack of discernment coming from the Republican loyalists who have made voting Republican a sacrament.

Originally Posted by Aquila

I've got the facts straight. I used the wrong terminology. Thanks for the correction. He is the "Defendant" in a civil lawsuit involving child rape allegations.

But, if guilty, does that make anything better?

No, you didn't have the facts straight. You claimed there are pending charges, which there are not. You claim he will be "put away" which he will not be.

Also, you're posting all these accusations without giving Trump the same basic rights you demand for Clinton. These are allegations and accusations, yet, because of petulant, liberal bias, you've already declared Trump is a pedophile, a child rapist and one who should receive "what's coming to him."

[n david]

Originally Posted by Aquila

And conservatives never use memes do they? lol

On AFF, the overwhelming majority of memes are used by libs.