Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam
I would agree with that statement. It is my understanding that salvation/healing/deliverance are all the same basic word and that what we call salvation is healing for the whole person -- spirit, soul, and body.
|
I also believe that "healing for the whole person" was part of the atonement. Notice how both King David and James seem to include healing for body and soul in one thought:
"Bless the Lord, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits:
Who forgiveth all thine iniquities; who healeth all thy diseases;
Who redeemeth thy life from destruction; who crowneth thee with lovingkindness and tender mercies;
Who satisfieth thy mouth with good things; so that thy youth is renewed like the eagle's." (
Ps 103:2-5)
"Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord:
And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him.
Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much." (
James 5:14-16)
I think the question of all being physically healed who ask for it is separate and apart from whether or not physical healing was actually included in the Atonement. I say this because I believe it boils down to a matter of appropriation based on faith. Both the elders who pray and the recipient must exercise faith. In the passage above, James places the focus (vs. 16) on the "effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man". That doesn't mean faith isn't required from the one requesting healing. But here, James specifically focuses on the ones doing the praying.
We know from the Gospel narratives that all who came to Jesus for healing were healed. From what is inferred in Acts, all who came to the Apostles for healing were healed. There are two exceptions: Mt 17:16-21 and Mt 13:54-58. The first instance was due to unbelief on the part of those praying; the second, unbelief on those being prayed for. We know in the first instance that healing was possible, because the child was eventually healed (Mt 17:18). We know that in the second instance, healing was available, because in every other account Jesus healed ALL who came to him.
There is a third exception to why someone isn't healed: it is their time to die (
2Kings 13:14). Apart from this, I'm still searching to see if there exists a NT passage which suggests it is God's will for a person to not be healed. So far, I haven't found one.
1Cor 11:28-30 suggests that sickness is incurred in someone's life because they partake of the Lord's Supper "unworthily". We could infer, though, that if this situation were corrected, the sickness would be healed.