Obama's Anti- Fed Funded Abortion Executive Order

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Notice the date that Obama repealed this policy. That's right! The beginning of his presidency!

But we get it - a welfare state cannot support that many people. In order to keep population control down to save us money - we need to abort them. Find out who is having the most kids and set up abortion clinics in those areas.

Nothing changes what he just did to save the lives of potentially millions of children.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by SOUNWORTHY

If Obama is so cotton pickin MORAL remember this?

Jan 23, 2009 ... President Obama struck down a rule Friday that prohibits US money from funding international family-planning clinics that promote abortion ... He may not be a baby killer but he stands back with an approving smile while others do it. He's a liberals, liberal.

How's that cool-aid taste?

I think it's grape flavored tonight.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Nothing changes what he just did to save the lives of potentially millions of children.

So, you are cool with his repeal of the Mexico City policy? BTW, it was established by Reagan and when Clinton took office he also repealed it. GWB put it back in place and now Obama repeals it. See how it works?

[SOUNWORTHY]

Apparently Liberal's have something against babies being born.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by SOUNWORTHY

Apparently Liberal's have something against babies being born.

Seems like that's the case.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

So, you are cool with his repeal of the Mexico City policy? BTW, it was established by Reagan and when Clinton took office he also repealed it. GWB put it back in place and now Obama repeals it. See how it works?

No I am not "cool" with his repeal of the Mexico City policy.

However, I am very cool with his EO.


Honestly, an EO carries A LOT of weight and the same folks attacking it's effectiveness now would be honoring this EO as a sign of moral strength had a Republican signed it.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

No I am not "cool" with his repeal of the Mexico City policy.

However, I am very cool with his EO.


Honestly, an EO carries A LOT of weight and the same folks attacking it's effectiveness now would be honoring this EO as a sign of moral strength had a Republican signed it.

A Republican wouldn't have signed in this type of Healthcare bill. Love you man, but you don't appear to study too far outside of your perimeters.

This is a huge "Partisan" healthcare vote that affects this whole country. It's like stealing!

We had bi-partisan votes on the Medicare and Social Security votes, BUT not this one! Sneaky, dirty, rotten scoundrels! And I'm only being really polite.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

A Republican wouldn't have signed in this type of Healthcare bill. Love you man, but you don't appear to study too far outside of your perimeters.

This is a huge "Partisan" healthcare vote that affects this whole country. It's like stealing!

We had bi-partisan votes on the Medicare and Social Security votes, BUT not this one! Sneaky, dirty, rotten scoundrels! And I'm only being really polite.

We have to agree to disagree on the names you called those people who had the country's best interest at heart when they voted for Healthcare Reform.


It took courage to make that vote, especially with so much on the line.

Yet, that is exactly what they did, thinking nothing of their political future, they put their sights on the millions of Americans who will now be helped by this remarkable piece of legislation!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

We have to agree to disagree on the names you called those people who had the country's best interest at heart when they voted for Healthcare Reform.


It took courage to make that vote, especially with so much on the line.

Yet, that is exactly what they did, thinking nothing of their political future, they put their sights on the millions of Americans who will now be helped by this remarkable piece of legislation!

Jerymn,
Please pay very close attention - being voted out of office is not the same thing or as big of a deal as when your party leaders refuse to stand behind you and refuse to give you support. You are a political sunk duck and they know how to sink you. There is a big difference between the two. Do you understand that part of political maneuvering? Threats from party leaders hold much more weight than the voters.

If you get voted out, they move you around and keep you under their wing. If they get rid of you, you are gone. Do you understand that part?

Don't think for one minute that arms were not twisted. We know that they were. Stupak is not that stupid. He just got played and he went along with it. He had no choice.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Jerymn,
Please pay very close attention - being voted out of office is not the same thing or as big of a deal as when your party leaders refuse to stand behind you and refuse to give you support. You are a political sunk duck and they know how to sink you. There is a big difference between the two. Do you understand that part of political maneuvering? Threats from party leaders hold much more weight than the voters.

If you get voted out, they move you around and keep you under their wing. If they get rid of you, you are gone. Do you understand that part?

Don't think for one minute that arms were not twisted. We know that they were. Stupak is not that stupid. He just got played and he went along with it. He had no choice.

I understand what you are saying. In essence, the Democrats were bullied by Obama, Pelosi and Reid to vote for this legislation.

The Democrats who voted for the legislation, did so out of fear and self preservation.

I disagree with these sentiments.

I have to go now.

Take care and we can pick it up again soon.