|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
07-28-2008, 05:15 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
|
|
|
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Coffee Ms.
At least they don't glitter. LOL  |
LOL!! I had a very conservative female UPC relative who for a short time a few years ago wore wooden jewelry! IT was pieces of wood with a hole in them and a decorative scarf was threaded through those holes. It made a neat wooden necklace.
However someone must have preached against it because before long it was gone. I thought it was as creative as the women who burn their hair off so they can say they don't cut it.
__________________
"I think some people love spiritual bondage just the way some people love physical bondage. It makes them feel secure. In the end though it is not healthy for the one who is lost over it or the one who is lives under the oppression even if by their own choice"
Titus2woman on AFF
"We did not wear uniforms. The lady workers dressed in the current fashions of the day, ...silks...satins...jewels or whatever they happened to possess. They were very smartly turned out, so that they made an impressive appearance on the streets where a large part of our work was conducted in the early years.
"It was not until long after, when former Holiness preachers had become part of us, that strict plainness of dress began to be taught.
"Although Entire Sanctification was preached at the beginning of the Movement, it was from a Wesleyan viewpoint, and had in it very little of the later Holiness Movement characteristics. Nothing was ever said about apparel, for everyone was so taken up with the Lord that mode of dress seemingly never occurred to any of us."
Quote from Ethel Goss (widow of 1st UPC Gen Supt. Howard Goss) book "The Winds of God"
|
07-28-2008, 05:19 PM
|
|
Shaking the dust off my shoes.
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nunya bidness
Posts: 9,004
|
|
|
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Coffee Ms.
I think the young man's posts concerning the reputation of Bro. Lee Stoneking and Ruth Harvey and some others have been very much out of line.
I don't like it one little bit when someone's character or reputation is brought onto Question as has these two.
|
I don't know which posts you are talking about because the LS thread ran its course when I was on my hair thread fast. However, I can imagine some of the things that were said and don't doubt for a minute that things got heated. It's been my experience that people from both sides of the aisle can say things in such a way that causes the other side to get defensive. If anything, both sides would be better served by learning how to better present their case.
Back on FCF, the discussions were heated, but much more civil in tone. The "slash and burn" approach took root after Jim died. For some reason, we've never been able to get back to how we discussed issues during the early days of posting. I believe it's because the foundation upon which our interacting with other, namely that we would discuss our differences while maintaining a certain decorum, was destroyed and has not been rebuilt with subsequent versions of FCF.
|
07-28-2008, 05:28 PM
|
 |
My Family!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 31,786
|
|
|
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoman
What if I disagree with myself, then later read it and consider it bashing? Can I be assured that infractions will be pursued? If so, what if the infraction hurts my feelings?  |
Take your own advice - get some tougher skin!
__________________
Master of Science in Applied Disgruntled Religious Theorist Wrangling
PhD in Petulant Tantrum Quelling
Dean of the School of Hard Knocks
|
07-28-2008, 06:09 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,809
|
|
|
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post
come into the oxygen..
|
07-28-2008, 06:24 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
|
|
|
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1
I agree. Many times I have come to the defense of LS by stating that I would trust him alone with my wife or daughter any day.
I have also stated that despite of the accusations that it is adornment I think RR's giant feathers are...er.....interesting.
 |
UGLY-UGLY ..............................but FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
|
07-28-2008, 06:37 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
|
|
|
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley
UGLY-UGLY ..............................but FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
You hurt my feelings (and you know how sensitive I am)!
__________________
"I think some people love spiritual bondage just the way some people love physical bondage. It makes them feel secure. In the end though it is not healthy for the one who is lost over it or the one who is lives under the oppression even if by their own choice"
Titus2woman on AFF
"We did not wear uniforms. The lady workers dressed in the current fashions of the day, ...silks...satins...jewels or whatever they happened to possess. They were very smartly turned out, so that they made an impressive appearance on the streets where a large part of our work was conducted in the early years.
"It was not until long after, when former Holiness preachers had become part of us, that strict plainness of dress began to be taught.
"Although Entire Sanctification was preached at the beginning of the Movement, it was from a Wesleyan viewpoint, and had in it very little of the later Holiness Movement characteristics. Nothing was ever said about apparel, for everyone was so taken up with the Lord that mode of dress seemingly never occurred to any of us."
Quote from Ethel Goss (widow of 1st UPC Gen Supt. Howard Goss) book "The Winds of God"
|
07-28-2008, 08:04 PM
|
 |
Honorary Admin
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 6,287
|
|
|
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1
I agree. Many times I have come to the defense of LS by stating that I would trust him alone with my wife or daughter any day.
I have also stated that despite of the accusations that it is adornment I think RR's giant feathers are...er.....interesting.
|
Let's see.......RR's giant feathers or speedos? WOW.....that is a tough one. I think I'm inclined to go with the speedos as ugly as that may be!
__________________
"Those who go after the "Sauls" among us often slay the Davids among us." Gene Edwards
Executive Servant http://www.newlife-church.org
|
08-05-2008, 03:19 PM
|
|
Did anyone find my keys
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Side of the road throwing bricks
Posts: 583
|
|
|
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post
Actually the reason that I post so little is that I really don't have a lot to add to most of these discussions. After a while of not having a lot to say you just stop lurking and move on to other things.
|
08-05-2008, 03:44 PM
|
|
My Family!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 31,786
|
|
|
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thumper
Actually the reason that I post so little is that I really don't have a lot to add to most of these discussions. After a while of not having a lot to say you just stop lurking and move on to other things.
|
I feel like that sometimes.
|
08-05-2008, 04:38 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,791
|
|
|
Re: The REAL Reason CONS have left or rarely post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thumper
Actually the reason that I post so little is that I really don't have a lot to add to most of these discussions. After a while of not having a lot to say you just stop lurking and move on to other things.
|
Because the rest of us already said it all? 
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:45 PM.
| |
Linear Mode
