Trinitarian Commentaries vs. Discourse Analysis (E

[Sean]

They know better.

They dare not be too similar to any of the other 100 plus modern translations.

If you were to create your own modern translation for sale, you would need to do the same thing, before copyrighting your new one too.

[Sean]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...eDZ-ydaZQHmJX3


Etc.

[Sean]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...GM1Ff8YOFhnZ3A


Etc!!!

[Scott Pitta]

I prefer reading a statement from actual Bible translators.

[Steven Avery]

Originally Posted by rdp

we are currently in the process of switching from the KJV to the ESV for our public reading in the church I pastor...

Did your research determine that the Westcott-Hort recension, the Critical Text, is superior and authentic compared to the Reformation Bible text? That the 45 verses, including the Mark Ending, the Pericope Adulterae, Acts 8:37, “father, forgive them”, the heavenly winesses, were dastardly interpolations rather than authenic scripture?

Steven

[Scott Pitta]

No 2 Greek manuscripts are identical. Each and every one is different in content.

I have no love or concern for the TC research done by Westcott/Hort.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

I prefer reading a statement from actual Bible translators.

Do they all agree as per their translations, or do copyrights force them to disagree?

[Scott Pitta]

I have never seen any statement from any translator or translation team that mentioned copyright issues.

Hopefully, this post will return to text linguistics and discourse analysis. Discourse analysis deserves more attention.

[Sean]

Maybe it is because everyone of them disagree with enough definitions that they just define new stuff per their whim.

Then finish and notice they are already different that the hundreds of others.

Now, that is a great representation of the word of God.

[Scott Pitta]

Are there more discourse analysis quotes ? Any from OT literature ?