Belief in god and the right to homosexuality?

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by shazeep

you are implying Christ was not speaking through Paul.

i imply no such thing, and have just recently directly stated the opposite. your post just goes further out on some limb from there, and i am not interested in being belittled by you. if you have a case, then state it.

No, you said Paul's words must be made to correspond to Christ's and not vice verse, which is not possible if they are both Christ's words.

Being belittled by me? i am not making it about you, but about your BELIEF. I did not say YOU were antichrist. I said your beliefs are antichrist. You are the person who belittles persons, as you insulted me beyond belief here many times. I have not demeaned you as a person. And if you carefully look at my interaction with you you will notice it is your beliefs that I targeted.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by shazeep

you are implying Christ was not speaking through Paul.

i imply no such thing, and have just recently directly stated the opposite. your post just goes further out on some limb from there, and i am not interested in being belittled by you. if you have a case, then state it, because i can go and dig up your previous attempts if you like, and let the reader decide.

Yes you did say such a thing, when you said we cannot correspond Christ's words to Paul's, but Paul's to Christ's, saying Christ's words are superior to Paul's. I will post it again next.

[shazeep]

"Tested" this? This again demonstrates your inability to realize Christ wrote through Paul, and Paul's words were actually Christ's.

exactly, as shown by Pauline passages that culminate in "Love" despite your attempts to make them about doctrine. 'Member? So i'm not sure what you mean by my inability to realize Christ there. Sorry, but you are not making any sense.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by shazeep

The quotes attributed to Christ must take precedence over anything you read from Paul,

That statement is as antichrist as they get. It implies Christ did not write through Paul, removing the equal value Paul's words have in status with Christ's.

[shazeep]

Originally Posted by mfblume

Yes you did say such a thing, when you said we cannot correspond Christ's words to Paul's, but Paul's to Christ's, saying Christ's words are superior to Paul's. I will post it again next.

please do, and i will clarify, because i did not mean what you are saying, there in part 1. Christ's Word blows Paul up tho, ya. Every day, and twice on Saturday.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by shazeep

"Tested" this? This again demonstrates your inability to realize Christ wrote through Paul, and Paul's words were actually Christ's.

exactly, as shown by Pauline passages that culminate in "Love" despite your attempts to make them about doctrine. 'Member? So i'm not sure what you mean by my inability to realize Christ there. Sorry, but you are not making any sense.

Paul's words do culminate in love. Doctrine is being twisted by yourself here as well. You have an aversion to written word. You feel written word is subservient to love, when in fact they are synonymous, because Christ is the word and Christ is love and the word is doctrine. This disparity you imagine is fully antichrist.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by shazeep

please do, and i will clarify, because i did not mean what you are saying, there in part 1. Christ's Word blows Paul up tho, ya. Every day, and twice on Saturday.

I already did in post #34.

[shazeep]

Originally Posted by mfblume

That statement is as antichrist as they get. It implies Christ did not write through Paul, removing the equal value Paul's words have in status with Christ's.

you wish.

[shazeep]

you gotta be kidding me if post 34 is all you got.

[shazeep]

that's it? Jesus is God, but Paul = Jesus, and don't ask any questions? Really? You wanna maybe take the evening and check your facts here? Because i am not interested in winning some silly argument by sophistry. Take your time.