Angels reproducing with humans possible?

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by good samaritan

So is the scripture implying the angels where homosexual? Or maybe could it mean that angels laying with humans and homosexuality are both unatural and their flesh is not meant to work that way. I don't think anyone can really prove or disprove anything on this. It is all interesting though.

Was it you who said that same statement before? Someone did. And I disagreed then as I do now. lol

I think we certainly can prove one way or another. Just because some cannot come to a conlcusion does not mean there is none.

[good samaritan]

By all means prove it. So far I just haven't heard anything convincing enough for me. To me this isn't the gospel anyway so why do we have to be concrete on the subject. In all honesty the scripture sounds like the sons of God where angels IMO. I am enjoying the conversation though, so please continue.

[shazeep]

Human genes inserted into rice might def be considered "strange." Although I'm skeptical of the version of Enoch that has come down to us, i think it's at least worth considering that the ancients had knowledge that we usually don't give them credit for. And it only makes sense that fallen angels would try to tempt man with knowledge that would send them in the wrong direction, atom bombs, etc.

[mfblume]

Once again, all the proof I need, and I know I'm repeating this, is the fact Jesus said angels don't marry. Period. Nothing need more be said. It's impossible, there's no gene manipulation, no sci-if elements involved. Just word, and context from Genesis 1 through 12 shows the plight of man with Adam sinning, Cain sinning, Cain banished, Sethites begin, two human lines exist - godly and ungodly, population grows, Sethites and Cainites converge - Gen 6:1, intermarriage of ungodly and backslidden godly, Noah alone remains righteous. Flood. Men backslide again, and build their own name and city and tower. God once again separates a people in Abraham to build him a name and city. Two lines continue again.

No antecdent in the word exists for angels being sons of God before Genesis 6,which is required in any literature. It just is. No one would write a book, not even Genesis, without antecedents in place for references mentioned. The antecedent is Gen 4 and Seth calling himself by Gods name and praying when his son Enos is born.

That doesn't have to convince you like it does me, but to me that's proof enough. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. LEAVE MY MIND ALONE. Lolololol. J/k

[Sean]

Originally Posted by good samaritan

By all means prove it. So far I just haven't heard anything convincing enough for me. To me this isn't the gospel anyway so why do we have to be concrete on the subject. In all honesty the scripture sounds like the sons of God where angels IMO. I am enjoying the conversation though, so please continue.

If this subject comes up in my class, I say that the sons of God are humans, but I dont 'attack" the other point of view.(I used to teach it myself)

[thephnxman]

Originally Posted by mfblume

Once again, all the proof I need, and I know I'm repeating this, is the fact Jesus said angels don't marry. Period. Nothing need more be said. It's impossible, there's no gene manipulation, no sci-if elements involved. Just word, and context from Genesis 1 through 12 shows the plight of man with Adam sinning, Cain sinning, Cain banished, Sethites begin, two human lines exist - godly and ungodly, population grows, Sethites and Cainites converge - Gen 6:1, intermarriage of ungodly and backslidden godly, Noah alone remains righteous. Flood. Men backslide again, and build their own name and city and tower. God once again separates a people in Abraham to build him a name and city. Two lines continue again.

No antecdent in the word exists for angels being sons of God before Genesis 6,which is required in any literature. It just is. No one would write a book, not even Genesis, without antecedents in place for references mentioned. The antecedent is Gen 4 and Seth calling himself by Gods name and praying when his son Enos is born.

That doesn't have to convince you like it does me, but to me that's proof enough. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. LEAVE MY MIND ALONE. Lolololol. J/k

Amen. Truth is Truth: everything else is vain imaginations.

[Sean]

I just call it the demon baby doctrine

[Sean]

Maybe it got popular because of the movie "Rosemary's Baby"...LOL

[Sean]

I wonder if the babies of Noahs' time had 666 on their foreheads?

[Sean]

They mighta had long tails and horns too!