Pastors move to withhold/lessen SFC offerings in protest of NAYC - Page 6

Theresa · #51 09-04-2007, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Uh, yeah.

that is retarded.

something is very wrong if a person cannot express an OPINION about things they read, regardless of where they read it. He didnt betray any specific confidences.

SDG · #52 09-04-2007, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Imagine if our High Priest had decided to withhold His offering because of our sin?

If a pastor feels he has the "right' to withhold his offering as a boycott... it was never an offering in the first place.

Bump

LadyRev · #53 09-04-2007, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobDylan

First of all, I have no stakes in politics. I am not UPC and don't plan to be. I am making an outside objective observation. I see where CR is coming from, and I understand and sympathise with the pastors who she is condemning.

Please present FACTS and state your SOURCES for your so-called "objective" observations.

Otherwise, your "independent ramblings" against the UPCI are nothing more than sour grape comments so prevelant among "independent" apostolics.

SDG · #54 09-04-2007, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Theresa

that is retarded.

something is very wrong if a person cannot express an OPINION about things they read, regardless of where they read it. He didnt betray any specific confidences.

We all have our disabilities.

Theresa · #55 09-04-2007, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Doesn't stop me from opining.

powers that be must like YOU

you seem to be one of the few that can say what they feel without some reprimand LOL

revrandy · #56 09-04-2007, 01:56 PM

As for CAF...

There was some discussion during the NYC about what went on and what they disagreed with but there were much more disagreements before NYC and what happened there...

They might have discussed it and was unhappy with what they disagreed with but have since moved on...

and there is not much discussion over there concerning AFF... fyi...

Malvaro · #57 09-04-2007, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnmark93

I thought I was addressing the topic at hand. Can you please define what the topic is so I will not make the mistake of offending these precious mild-mannered men. I thought my description was rather specific.

your reference to "other forums" needed the edit....

Your post regarding "withholding monies is an attempt to control the direction of an organization" was on-topic as it dealt with the "why".... and could have stayed....

#58 09-04-2007, 01:57 PM

This thread should be closed permanently as it is totally impossible for any poster to know what is permissable to speak about. How very, very odd.

SDG · #59 09-04-2007, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revrandy

As for CAF...

There was some discussion during the NYC about what went on and what they disagreed with but there were much more disagreements before NYC and what happened there...

They might have discussed it and was unhappy with what they disagreed with but have since moved on...

and there is not much discussion over there concerning AFF... fyo...

Do they discuss things like "magic hair"?

Theresa · #60 09-04-2007, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revrandy

As for CAF...

There was some discussion during the NYC about what went on and what they disagreed with but there were much more disagreements before NYC and what happened there...

They might have discussed it and was unhappy with what they disagreed with but have since moved on...

and there is not much discussion over there concerning AFF... fyi...

watch it - you cant mention other forums.