Moses was unfaithful when called

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Esaias

"A completed action in the past." Is that not what I said?

Kind of reminds you of Elder James LeDeay?

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Kind of reminds you of Elder James LeDeay?

The elder came across as sincere. Sincerely misguided on some things, but sincere nonetheless. He seemed to have a high regard for God and His Word, albeit he was in the weeds quite a bit about eschatology.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Esaias

The elder came across as sincere. Sincerely misguided on some things, but sincere nonetheless. He seemed to have a high regard for God and His Word, albeit he was in the weeds quite a bit about eschatology.

Yeah, I remember when we first started to go at it. He was pretty coherent. But as the years went on his faculties started to fade. I guess I noticed too late. I don’t doubt he loved God. He was 100% an Apostolic Jesus namer. He believed in Jesus name baptism, and the infilling of the Holy Ghost with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues. He was with me on the name of Jesus over the Hebrew list of guess names. Now that you bring up his good points, I’m kind of sad I compared him with Don.

[donfriesen1]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Good grief

n c

[donfriesen1]

Originally Posted by Esaias

"A completed action in the past." Is that not what I said?

True. It is what you said.

and you also said in post 92:

Notice also "ye are circumcised" (present tense reality)

Whereas Blue Letter Bible says

'ye are circumcised', v11, is in "Verb - Aorist Passive Indicative - 2nd Person Plural" form, which indicates an action that was completed in the past, happened to a group of people, and had no connection to the present.

An action completed in the past is much different than an action in the present. Blue Letter Bible contradicts what you had said.

[donfriesen1]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Yeah, I remember when we first started to go at it. He was pretty coherent. But as the years went on his faculties started to fade. I guess I noticed too late. I don’t doubt he loved God. He was 100% an Apostolic Jesus namer. He believed in Jesus name baptism, and the infilling of the Holy Ghost with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues. He was with me on the name of Jesus over the Hebrew list of guess names. Now that you bring up his good points, I’m kind of sad I compared him with Don.

n c

[donfriesen1]

Originally Posted by Esaias

The elder came across as sincere. Sincerely misguided on some things, but sincere nonetheless. He seemed to have a high regard for God and His Word, albeit he was in the weeds quite a bit about eschatology.

n c

[donfriesen1]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Kind of reminds you of Elder James LeDeay?

n c

[Amanah]

Originally Posted by donfriesen1

True. It is what you said.

and you also said in post 92:

Whereas Blue Letter Bible saysAn action completed in the past is much different than an action in the present. Blue Letter Bible contradicts what you had said.

Good job with the quotes!

[donfriesen1]

Originally Posted by Amanah

I'm on strike till Don learns to quote

I'm on strike till Don learns to quote

.