Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2013, 09:03 AM
Dante Dante is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 375
Statism and Marriage

Marriage has always been a religious institution. Governments have siezed control of marriage over the past few decades in the name of protecting its citizens, preventing incest in some cases, and also in the effort to prevent the spread of various diseases.

With that said, just because man's government has siezed control of this sacred institution does it mean that we as the Church should submit to the man-made rules and regulations set forth by the State? I believe the church is the sole and only authority to dictate the definition and execution of marriage, not the state! In other words, because marriage has been defined by the constructs of religion, it should stay that way. The government cannot redfine marriage, or say who anyone can or cannot marry. That power rests within the authority of God's Kingdom, the church.

So, why are so many Christians submissive to the guidelines of statist marriage rules and regulations?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2013, 09:18 AM
MarcBee MarcBee is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 801
Re: Statism and Marriage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante View Post
d

So, why are so many Christians submissive to the guidelines of statist marriage rules and regulations?
...because churches accept government financial subsidies in the form of tax free 501c3 status. Cut that chain of dependency, and churches will have the right (and the inclination) to go their own way.
__________________
_______________________________________

Deeply JN Apostolic: 1978-1999.
Happily agnostic/atheist 2011 to present.

Good news! The gospel boils down to, "Love me
or I will destroy you." --A god.


Last edited by MarcBee; 03-28-2013 at 09:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2013, 09:26 AM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Statism and Marriage

This American Thinker article is very well written. I was wondering if anybody was going to fight for anything sane "or natural" in this current social battle.

Gay Marriage and Legal Surrealism
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/...0j0GEU.twitter
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2013, 09:52 AM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Statism and Marriage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
This American Thinker article is very well written. I was wondering if anybody was going to fight for anything sane "or natural" in this current social battle.

Gay Marriage and Legal Surrealism
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/...0j0GEU.twitter
Excellent article.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2013, 09:50 AM
Dedicated Mind Dedicated Mind is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,711
Re: Statism and Marriage

the right response is to bury your head in the sand and pretend the issue doesn't exist.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-28-2013, 10:45 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Statism and Marriage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante View Post
Marriage has always been a religious institution. Governments have siezed control of marriage over the past few decades in the name of protecting its citizens, preventing incest in some cases, and also in the effort to prevent the spread of various diseases.

With that said, just because man's government has siezed control of this sacred institution does it mean that we as the Church should submit to the man-made rules and regulations set forth by the State? I believe the church is the sole and only authority to dictate the definition and execution of marriage, not the state! In other words, because marriage has been defined by the constructs of religion, it should stay that way. The government cannot redfine marriage, or say who anyone can or cannot marry. That power rests within the authority of God's Kingdom, the church.

So, why are so many Christians submissive to the guidelines of statist marriage rules and regulations?
I agree with your overall premise. However, I want to expand upon it a little. In your post you stated...

Quote:
Marriage has always been a religious institution.

I believe the church is the sole and only authority to dictate the definition and execution of marriage, not the state!
The problem I have with your statement is this... marriage isn't even under the authority of the church. Nor is marriage defined by the church. The reason I say this is based upon Christ's own statement concerning marriage.
Mark 10:9
"What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.”
Marriage originated in Eden. God formed man of the dust of the earth and woman from man. They were given unto one another by God. There wasn't any human government, there wasn't any religion, there wasn't any church, and there wasn't any clergy. We see no ceremony, ritual, or sacrement. We see God giving man and woman to one another to be mates. For this reason, choosing a mate (husband, wife, life partner, whatever you want to call it) is a "natural right" endowed by one's creator... and even initiated by one's creator. God, who is love, brings two human beings together in the bonds of His very essence... love.

Marriage is then a "common right" and has been regarded as so since the most ancient of times. In the OT a man could have permission from a woman's father to marry her, take her, and declare her his wife. The father's permission was only necessary if she were still living under her father's authority. If living on her own, such as with Ruth, a man could take a woman as his wife before God out in his field. No government, religion, church, or clergy necessary. As a result, every ancient culture saw marriage as a private arrangement between private individuals and/or families under common law; hense "common law marriage". It was the state church that began regulating marriage with licenses during the Middle Ages to prevent people from marrying below their class and thereby scattering the inheritance of the wealthy to the masses of commoners. In the early colonies of America marriage licenses were unheard of and marriage was once again an issue of common right/common law. A man and woman could declare themselves husband and wife out on their farm. Clergy and the church could bless their union or condemn it... nevertheless, they were regarded as being married eyes of God. As whites and blacks began marrying, the state began to issue marriage licenses to prevent interracial marriage. Soon, every state required a license for anyone seeking to marry. As a result, the state took over the private social arrangement of marriage.

Thus, in my opinion "marriage" is a private commitment between each couple and/or their family before God. No state, church, or clergy necessary.

Quakers have an interesting tradition. Historically they "self-officiated" their marriages. Having no clergy, and believing in the separation of church and state, a couple would declare their intent to marry. If nothing was found to present a case as to why they shouldn't be married in the community, the couple could stand, give their "promises" (vows), and take one another as husband and wife before God, friends, and family. No clergy. No filing with the state. States wherein common law marriage is still recognize acknowlege these marriages as legally binding. States that do not recognize common law marriage do not.

So, I argue that "marriage" isn't under any authority other than the couple themselves, and perhaps their families in various circumstances. And in all cases, the arrangement is entirely private.

Hope that made sense. God bless.

Last edited by Aquila; 03-28-2013 at 10:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2013, 10:49 AM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Statism and Marriage

Aquila, I just read this today. The author is an atheist, but she makes a good point.

Personally, I believe this whole issue is not about "gay rights" per se. I believe that if the left gets its way, it will not simply be the “right to marry.” It will be the right to silence anyone who disagrees with them.

Quote:
Dissecting the Argument for Traditional Marriage

I know social conservatives would never suggest it, at least not as I’ve stated it here, because it does not forbid same sex unions, per se. Admittedly, I intentionally avoided saying anything about that. The government has no place refusing such unions, because the state’s part in the process is purely the legalities – that is the case now, and should remain that way. Churches would be free to forbid those unions at will, and that would be protecting the sanctity of marriage – the state should not be able to dictate the actions of churches when it comes to the recognition of same sex marriage. Religion and politics do not mix well. This nation was founded because of that fact, but too many of us tend to forget that, or twist it to our own purposes. Too many people forget that the “separation of church and state” was meant to be a two-way street. It is meant to not only protect churches from interference by government, but also protect government from the same by churches. It was a good theory over 200 years ago, and it still is now.

http://politichicks.tv/column/dissec...onal-marriage/
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-28-2013, 11:08 AM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: Statism and Marriage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
Aquila, I just read this today. The author is an atheist, but she makes a good point.

Personally, I believe this whole issue is not about "gay rights" per se. I believe that if the left gets its way, it will not simply be the “right to marry.” It will be the right to silence anyone who disagrees with them.
Yes exactly! It's already in progress.

"Before getting into the details of what appears to be an incredible hoax, it’s important to understand the nature of this very dangerous bill, which would make it illegal for a licensed therapist to offer professional help to a minor with unwanted same-sex attractions, even if the minor had parental permission."

http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/...-jersey-senate
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-28-2013, 11:19 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Statism and Marriage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoovie View Post
Yes exactly! It's already in progress.

"Before getting into the details of what appears to be an incredible hoax, it’s important to understand the nature of this very dangerous bill, which would make it illegal for a licensed therapist to offer professional help to a minor with unwanted same-sex attractions, even if the minor had parental permission."

http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/...-jersey-senate
The GOVERNMENT is the problem... not gays per se. They should be allowed to live as they choose. However, when involving GOVERNMENT, everyone is forced to comply with various standards.

We should privatize marriage. Get the STATE out of our private relationships and associations.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-28-2013, 11:17 AM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Statism and Marriage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
Aquila, I just read this today. The author is an atheist, but she makes a good point.

Personally, I believe this whole issue is not about "gay rights" per se. I believe that if the left gets its way, it will not simply be the “right to marry.” It will be the right to silence anyone who disagrees with them.
So true. That's why marriage should be taken back to the private domain.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What comes after same sex marriage? Sam Political Talk 10 09-17-2012 01:29 AM
Was your marriage ceremony.... RandyWayne Fellowship Hall 43 10-19-2009 09:01 PM
Gay Marriage Dedicated Mind Fellowship Hall 43 11-18-2008 09:14 PM
Network TV against Marriage Praxeas Fellowship Hall 4 08-06-2008 04:57 PM
Marriage is give and take Trouvere Fellowship Hall 136 06-11-2007 06:55 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.