Dan Scott's Thought on Trinity

[TRFrance]

Originally Posted by JTULLOCK

I know Apostolics that does not fit the Apostolic box either and I know people that fit the Apostolic box but ain't Apostolic. Doesn't matter. He does not fit that mold from the preaching I have heard. It seems that people love to try and crucify him and throw stones at him and they don't know him.

What does cares what "mold" you think he fits ?
You think his style of preaching determines whether or not he's really Anglican... rather than the fact he has chosen to become ordained in an Anglican organization?

Wow. You are so in denial, JT. Even for you, this is mind boggling.
Take the blinders off, bro.

Originally Posted by JTULLOCK

HAHA....this is an example of how conditioning can trip a person out. Some people are so conditioned that there are "very signifigant differences" between Oneness and Trinity. Perhaps in your mind it is very different, but here in reality where I live it is not. A Trinitarian explaining the Godhead is similar to how a Oneness person does.

It is kinda like a Oneness person and a Trinitarian are both looking at a quarter. They are both trying to explain what the other person is looking at while describing the side that only they can see. Both are looking at the same quarter, but different points of view and doing it with different verbage. You might not agree and I am sure you won't but that it how it is.

Well, you've long seemed intent on blurring the lines between Oneness and Trinity, so I expect this kind of talk from you.

If I thought it would be a productive use of my time, I'd actually spell out some of those significant differences that you dont think are very significant. But why bother? If you cant see the very clear significant and distinctive differences between the two doctrines by now, nothing I say will make a difference anyway. But you're kidding yourself if you think Oneness and Trinity are just two different ways of explaining the same thing.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TRFrance

Well I respect Pastor Hardwick as being a minister who loves God etc., but if he did indeed say this he is sadly mistaken. There are very significant differences between the Oneness and Trinity understandings of the nature of God.

This the problem with men who never hear truth preached their logic becomes warped. I promise you A.D. Gurley thought there was a difference.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by JTULLOCK

HAHA....this is an example of how conditioning can trip a person out. Some people are so conditioned that there are "very signifigant differences" between Oneness and Trinity. Perhaps in your mind it is very different, but here in reality where I live it is not. A Trinitarian explaining the Godhead is similar to how a Oneness person does.

It is kinda like a Oneness person and a Trinitarian are both looking at a quarter. They are both trying to explain what the other person is looking at while describing the side that only they can see. Both are looking at the same quarter, but different points of view and doing it with different verbage. You might not agree and I am sure you won't but that it how it is.

Sorry ONE and THREE is NOT the same. Would work at home I have ONE wife meaning THREE women make ONE wife! Your wife would think it was semantics.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TRFrance

What does cares what "mold" you think he fits ?You think his style of preaching determines whether or not he's really.. Anglican... rather than the fact he.. has chosen to become ordained in an Anglican organization?Wow. You are so in denial, JT. Even for you, this is mind boggling. Take the blinders off, bro... Well, you've long seemed intent on blurring the lines between Oneness and Trinity, so I expect this kind of talk from you. If I thought it would be a productive use of my time, I'd actually spell out some of those significant differences that you dont think are very significant. But why bother? If you cant see the very clear significant and distinctive differences between the two doctrines by now, nothing I say will make a difference anyway. But you're kidding yourself if you think Oneness and Trinity are just two different ways of explaining the same thing.

The MAIN difference about Oneness and Trinity is eternity and Hell is going last a long time.

[Jack Shephard]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Sorry ONE and THREE is NOT the same. Would work at home I have ONE wife meaning THREE women make ONE wife! Your wife would think it was semantics.

I respect you but this is dumb. You are using an invalid example. No way can you have three wives is one cause it is all flesh, God isn't so He exists however He wants too. 3 manifestations of 1 God, that says it all.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by JTULLOCK

I respect you but this is dumb. You are using an invalid example. No way can you have three wives is one cause it is all flesh, God isn't so He exists however He wants too. 3 manifestations of 1 God, that says it all.

The three women possess the SAME human nature suppose they are sisters thus same family yet ONE wife. In the Trinity you have THREE persons that possess the SAME Divine nature. Sir I have had public debates with Trinitarians on this subject there is a great difference between ONE and Three and the MAIN difference is eternity in Hell. Jn. 8:24

[Jack Shephard]

Say what you will. Truth is you can not make a fair comparison between humanity and divinity.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by JTULLOCK

Say what you will. Truth is you can not make a fair comparison between humanity and divinity.

The TRUTH about the Godhead is DIVINTY & HUMANITY NOT three DIVINE beings or persons.

[Jack Shephard]

Did you even read his whole blog about the Trinity? If so then you would have seen where he talks about the word 'persona' translated in english to persons not being the proper way to describe God. You and TR try to get all tricky and the reason is that if you saw it then you would realize you have been explaining wrong for a long time. JMHO

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by JTULLOCK

Did you even read his whole blog about the Trinity? If so then you would have seen where he talks about the word 'persona' translated in english to persons not being the proper way to describe God. You and TR try to get all tricky and the reason is that if you saw it then you would realize you have been explaining wrong for a long time. JMHO

I think you might be like him and really don't know what you believe.