*BREAKING*Tulsa gathering beginning to unravel!

[Jekyll]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

You were the one that asked why it's beginning to unravel. I believe it appeared that you hadn't been able to read some of the post that they were posting names without approval - - we were just getting you up to speed and answering your question.

No need to get all snarky - lol!

Okay, now I get it, I reread your post.

My question was supposed to ask why people are thinking it is unravelling? I understand what they were saying but this doesn't mean it is unravelling.

Okay, good night all (maybe)

[embonpoint]

Originally Posted by Felicity

Technical incompetence how?

Originally Posted by embonpoint

In allowing the site to be publicly accessible while still under construction.

Kind of reminds me of when Pres. Regan was doing a mic test and inadvertently announced on national radio that bombing of the Soviet Union would begin in 5 minutes.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Jekyll

I'm still cleaning my glasses.


Maybe I'd better do something else tonight.

Lol!

[BoredOutOfMyMind]

Originally Posted by stmatthew

It could be that they are not as computer savvy as some of us are, and did not realize that just because the front page is listed as under construction that someone can get into the rest of it still.

http://www.worldwidepf.com/

Google that url and you see we are linked to it only!

[Jekyll]

Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind

Google that url and you see we are linked to it only!

What?

[Elizabeth]

Originally Posted by Jekyll

Of course. One name was added within the last 24hrs. who personally told me he had been asked and was not added until then. So, who's to say who has been asked and who has not been asked?

Originally Posted by Jekyll

According to Jeanie, these points have already been discussed and is not new information. Shame on you all. We need new discussion material

You miss understood me, in the post that I answered you said "Who's to say who has been asked and who has not been asked-"

It was a point of reference- without giving names. Not chiding you for bring it up--others may not know.

From what I read on this forum calls by headquaters to names on the list were made--only to find out that those ministers didnt even know that they were on the list.

[staysharp]

Originally Posted by Bullwinkle

Some of the founders of the Tulsa Triumph need to learn about business and organizational formation. Specifically - don't put information on the internet unless you are ready to have it spread and you have confirmed the names.
The list may be fluid but anybody with two clues to rub together should know better than to post them on a website accessible to the public.
IMHO they are trying to use men's names and reputations to bring others on board.

Again I ask the question..."Are Apostolics Wise?" Seems we need to revive my thread!

[Felicity]

Originally Posted by embonpoint

In allowing the site to be publicly accessible while still under construction.

Gotcha!

[Jekyll]

Originally Posted by Jeanie

You miss understood me, in the post that I answered you said "Who's to say who has been asked and who has not been asked-"

It was a point of reference- without giving names. Not chiding you for bring it up--others may not know.

From what I read on this forum calls by headquaters to names on the list were made--only to find out that those ministers didnt even know that they were on the list.

I agree. I am sorry.

[Elizabeth]

Originally Posted by Bullwinkle

Some of the founders of the Tulsa Triumph need to learn about business and organizational formation. Specifically - don't put information on the internet unless you are ready to have it spread and you have confirmed the names.The list may be fluid but anybody with two clues to rub together should know better than to post them on a website accessible to the public.
IMHO they are trying to use men's names and reputations to bring others on board.

My point exactly, you could have gotten away with this 10 years ago but not now-