The Difference Between the PCI of the Merger and the Current Counterfeits

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by freeatlast

So by this defintion those who embrace the oneness theolgy who once saw the trinity doctrine would be backsliders?

A person who thought it was OK to smoke and be saved but now they feel that a person should not smoke..is a backslider??

They have been called much worse than backsliders!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How about heretics, cult?

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Okay then, freeatlast, Sherri and Daniel, we are all friends right?
I have nothing but respect for you. But give me a little latitude to explain myself, please.

1. Would you all agree that you have left what you once believed, or that you have left what you were once identified as?2. Can you see Coonskinner's point that our doctrine is continually slammed and poked at, and dissed on these forums? Yet when we state any disdain for "belief only" doctrine we are viewed as intolerant and judgemental.

Surely you have viewed my posts enough to know that I try very hard to be anything but judgemental? We simply disagree - thats all.

I am not accountable for what I believed by default or tradition, I am responsible for what the Holy Spirit leads and guides me in.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

"When you can't refute the argument, marginalize the individual by accusing them of being part of some weird sub-culture that affects them in ways they cannot recognize."

An excerpt from "How to Obfuscate When Your Argument Is Thinner Than Sharecropper's Soup," by Daniel Alicea.

or we could revert to the CS playbook of Apostolic love ... call them backsliders, pathetic, or slack-jawed compromisers

[Coonskinner]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

They have been called much worse than backsliders!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How about heretics, cult?

And lumped in with Hitler.

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

I think not.

Both were practiced by God-fearing Christian people ... remember the apology on the latter???.

Daniel, slavery and segregation were NEVER religious beliefs.

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

or we could revert to the CS playbook of Apostolic love ... call them backsliders, pathetic, or slack-jawed compromisers

Let me see Dan, Wasn't it you who used the holocaust example of traditional Oneness Pentecostals!

Come on Pot speak to the kettle!!!

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Daniel, slavery and segregation were NEVER religious beliefs.

Agreed .. but pulpits were filled with doctrinal exegesis on why the Bible said it was ok....

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Daniel, slavery and segregation were NEVER religious beliefs.

Unless you were British Israel in doctrine!

Sorry to hit and run but my bride desires to go shopping and I do not want to put my "full" salvation to the test at this particular time!

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

America once believed in slavery and segregation ... have we backslid PP??? Of course, not

The term is being misused ... why do you insist on calling your friends and brethren such???

I have never called any of you a backslider! I only gave you the common understanding of what a backslider is. Now be nice to me, and apologize Bro.