3rd Presidential Debate Tonight 9pm EST!!!!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Light

Anyone that is honest have to admit Romney has change his positions more times than very clean men change their shorts.

So awfully true! It amazes me that Deacon is so excited over a landslide win for him. Doesn't matter about the flip-flopping and etch-a-sketching, I just want to back the WINNER!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

I thought Romney's line about Obama's trip to Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iraq while not stopping in Israel our most loyal ally in the Mideast was a win for him.

Really? It's a fact that very few presidents have visited Israel their first term, i.e., GWB (went second term) and Reagan never visited at all.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Timmy

Woohoooo!!!!

You need two sets of photos with red and blue uniforms

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Any of us watching the per-scripted, staged show between usurper Obama and pretender Romney are likely to fall into one of three camps.

1. Those who support Obama will see that he will win the debate no matter how vague he is and no matter how awful his record is especially vis. a vis the economy and wars.

2. Those who support Romney will see that he will win the debate no matter how many positions he takes on every issue and will twist their minds away from reason to convince themselves that he is actually conservative.

3. Those who see reality for what it is, or at least know that the subtle propaganda of duopoly is a huge lie and totally un-American will see that both of them will give power to the banksters, crush the economy, expand the police state and involve us in more undeclared wars. This growing group of Americans is looking for truth and a restoration of the Republic and respect for the Constitution. At minimum a fair debate is desirable.

I am in group number three. I'll let you decide which group you belong.

We've always been involved in wars and military actions around the world, what would the world be today if the US had not??? Yes, it could have been much better....if Jesus truly reigned, however He does not, just yet.

God could have used any nation to be the leader in the world, but He chose the US. We have not been perfect at it, but I guess you think Germany or USSR, or Japan would have done a better job.

I'm glad God decided and not the anti-Americans that can see no good in all that God has done thru the US. This world and all humans are flawed, so we have to do the best we can do, but it will always have room for correction or improvement.

That is why we all with the creation groan for the revealing of the children of God, and the redemption of the cosmos!!! Come Lord Jesus, and purge us, and the creation of the evil and wickedness that is so painful and hard for human existence.

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

Romney was definitely telling the truth about his opinions on the Detroit bailouts/bankruptcy. This opinion article was written by MR for the New York Times in 2008.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/op...ney.html?_r=1&

Quote from the article:

That is an example of the wisdom and experience that is needed in our government. But PO, still will demonize MR.

But you will not hear that in the leftist media! So, Obama took GM over and gave it to his cronies, the unions, and left the creditors out in the cold. Bottom line, it was a liberal, political bankruptcy, not a business bankruptcy that bring a new lease on life for the company. GM's story is not complete, they may go completely belly up yet. Why? Because the still carry the obligations that took the under to start with.

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Dedicated Mind

obama clearly dominated the debate. he is more consistent in his beliefs and policies.

Only in his own mind, not in his policies, and the mind of his mush brained followers.

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

No Obama wasn't successful as painting Romney as a warmonger but, Romney was successful as presenting himself to be a masculine Sally Struthers.

Even though technically, there are more bayonets around today than in 1916, President Obama had a great point and demonstrated a firmer grasp on our military forces and foreign affairs in general, when the "foreign affairs debate" happened to drift in that direction.

Obama's performance tonight mirrors Romney's performance in the first debate.

Obama's presentation of his performance in foreign policy is completely his delusions, not basis in reality!! His is an actor, not a leader, except in his own head.

[Pressing-On]

I focus more on the "severely" conservative candidate because we have already vetted and know Obama.

Romney spoke of being proud of his record in MA on education and it's ranking in the country. He failed to mention, although Obama corrected him, that the state began an overhaul on education 10 years before Romney became Governor.

Romney goes on to mention his scholarship program covering full in-state tuition, but fails to also mention that the funding doesn't cover fees which are quite larger than the tuition.

I would point out Obama's claim that the US has doubled exports to China since he came to office. The fact is, Vermont, South Dakota and South Carolina have tripled their exports to China, but that is not the numbers for the entire country.

And Romney did make this statement in a CNN interview, sometime back in March, "Russia, this is, without question, our No. 1 geopolitical foe." But, of course, when pressed, he states that, of course, Iran is our greatest nuclear threat.

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by BeenThinkin

Jermyn, you've got to be kidding! You sound like Juan Williams! I predict that the rise in the polls for Romney, as we have seen this week, will continue. We'll see!

Obama's performance was like a little boy who was unhappy because someone was messing with his toys.... so he'd just take his toys and go home.....or say anything he wanted to say, truth or not, because he knows the main-stream media will not call his hands on it tomorrow.

In this debate, Romney was a level headed, calm, factual, and I might say, "Presidential looking" debater who did not disrespect his opponent like Obama did him. Forgive me for saying it like this but here goes. "Romney was a man of character and Obama was a character!"

Been Thinkin

Obama is a neophyte, way over his experience and pay grade, it is a shame that he was able to become POTUS. Many think he is a calculating Socialists, and he has been school and mentor by radical leftists, but he is really a bumbling puppet. Without Soros, he would never have been elected.

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Wont happen. Romney in a landslide. He'll win 300-320 Electoral College votes. He'll win 34-35 states including Ohio, Iowa, Wisconsin, Colorado, Virginia, Florida and North Carolina. The MSM will be stunned and will turn on Obama like jackals. They will crucify him and his campaign for the first debate performance when the polls showed an uptick in support for Romney. They'll also play the racist card over and over that America is still fundamentally racist and that they couldn't handle another four years with a black president. They won't concede that liberal policies social and fiscal were his undoing, because that would be an admission that their vision of a socialist America was rejected by a majority of Americans.

Yep!! What you said!