Prophetic word by Bro Arcovio "no election"

[n david]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Then why don't they support a full investigation into the election hacking?

I support a full investigation into the hacking of the Democrat's emails. I also support a full investigation into the current activities of the CIA, NSA and why they're in the middle of what appears to be either blatant subversion or a treasonous coup.

And I would support an investigation into how the media, obama and Soros factor into all of this.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Ferd

hold on a second. Trump has said some complimentary things about Putin. But he has also said he has not met the man and doesn't know if in the end there is any way to work with him but he believes it is worth exploring the opportunity.

The hyperbole exists solely on the progressive side. These same progressives who are pronouncing the evil of Putin were dismissive of the raise eyebrows when Obama was heard on open mic telling the Russians that after the election he would have more "flexibility"

It was the Obama/Hillary team that handed over a very large portion of our Uranium to the RUSSIANS.

It was Obama and company that allowed things to get out of hand in Syria and opened the door for the Russians to waltz in.

It was the Obama team that blustered and frothed at the mouth and did NOTHING when Russia invaded Crimea.... which incidentally was set up by the OBama team doing nothing when the Russians invaded Georgia and took South Ossetia.

Now all the sudden the Russians are uber evil and must be opposed. Its like the left is beating a war drum. Trump is suggesting we have a common enemy (Islamic terror) and PROGS everywhere are all the sudden fronting their patriotic bonifides?

excuse me while I puke. the only thing Conservatives have done is refuse to offer up fake threats or red lines in the sand or stupid moronic rest buttons.

Pelosi says Sessions is evil for meeting a Russian ambassador and she has never even seen one.... except when a pic surfaces of her EATING DINNER WITH HIM.

im pulling my hair out here. this is just insane. Liberals have always been patriotic. PROGS on the other hand aren't at all. they hate America. just walk on any college in America and look for the real Progs.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Aquila

You don't know of any conservatives that have done this??? Where have you been, under a rock?

Nope.

Originally Posted by Aquila

Franklyn Graham praised Putin's actions regarding the homosexual community in Russia. Actions that are rather draconian and heavy handed. Why don't you ever curse Putin and voice concern that Putin may have swayed the election for the candidate he desired to see President of the United States?

Why don't you curse the large number of Democrats who have wined and dined and met with Russian diplomats during the obama administration?

Originally Posted by Aquila

Politics. It is customary to compliment a new world leader. Since then the Obama Administration was rather critical of Putin.

Hold. Up. This is an incredibly hypocritical (yet truthful) statement. On one hand, you condemn Trump for complimenting Putin. You condemn Franklin Graham for supporting Putin's stance against homosexuality. You condemn any conservative who happens to mention anything good about Putin or Russia.

Then when confronted about obama doing the same exact thing, you actually make a statement that is both truthful and hypocritical -- you claim it's just politics. I mentioned the hypocrisy of it already. Here's the truth in the statement -- it IS political. You said nothing when Obama and Hillary were given Russia uranium. You kept your mouth closed when Obama told Putin he'd have more flexibility after the upcoming election. You were mute when Hillary received payments from the Russians in exchange for her services.

So yes, it is alllll about politics. You don't care when it's a liberal who is being complimentary to the Russians or Putin. You only care because it's Trump.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

I support a full investigation into the hacking of the Democrat's emails. I also support a full investigation into the current activities of the CIA, NSA and why they're in the middle of what appears to be either blatant subversion or a treasonous coup.

Are you dense? LOL

The two are interrelated. If memory serves me right, the intelligence community issued official government notice of their findings relating to Russian hacking of the DNC and other sensitive assets on December 7th. Their surveillance and tracking covers an undisclosed number of months. Guess who was being surveilled as part of this investigation??? Just guess.

And I would support an investigation into how the media, obama and Soros factor into all of this.

I think the media works well with progressives and liberals. We've always had a decent relationship with the press.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Amanah

you are a democratic socialist after the manner of Bernie Sanders.

I figured. lol

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

Nope. You added the caveat later on.

First you posted flat out 1) no real election, 2) collusion and influence by Russia as fact and 3) election not Constitutional:



You've already declared Trump colluded and Russia illegally aided Trump during the election. Why the backpedal to add "should it be proven?" I thought this was already proven? You've been posting for weeks about how this happened -- as though it's proven fact and evidence exists to indict Trump. But now ... "should it be proven."

I mean, officially proven, with charges being filed and impeachment.

[aegsm76]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Are you dense? LOL

I think the media works well with progressives and liberals. We've always had a decent relationship with the press.

It's not about a decent relationship.
It is a fact that the press is overwhelmingly liberal.
And while they used to be smart enough to hide it, now they do not.

link
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-entrenched-f/

snippet
Research from U.S. News & World Report, the Los Angeles Times, the Freedom Forum and other organizations tracked the liberal or Democratic leanings of the press with similar findings; one report found that 90 percent of the White House press corps voted Democratic. And according to a meticulous and ongoing analysis of polling data by Indiana University, only 7 percent of journalists now say they are Republicans.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Are you dense? LOL

The two are interrelated. If memory serves me right, the intelligence community issued official government notice of their findings relating to Russian hacking of the DNC and other sensitive assets on December 7th. Their surveillance and tracking covers an undisclosed number of months. Guess who was being surveilled as part of this investigation??? Just guess.

So they released their findings on December 7th, which included information from an investigation which should have ended then, correct? Then why are they continuing to leak like a sieve, working with the press to release information damaging to the administration and doing Lord knows what behind the scenes.

I ask you now....are YOU dense? Wait, I already know the answer. It's politics. Were this happening with a liberal in the WH, you would be asking the same questions I'm asking and demanding investigations into the intel community.

Originally Posted by Aquila

I think the media works well with progressives and liberals. We've always had a decent relationship with the press.

No kidding. It used to be the media tried disguising their liberal bias. Now days they've completely abandoned it and have embraced their liberalism.

[Esaias]

It's not 'liberalism'. It's communism. 'Liberal' and 'progressive' are sweet-sounding words that mean 'pre-communist'. You guys should read more Mao and Stalin, they explained it perfectly. 'Democrat', 'liberal', and 'progressive' are terms used by communist subversives to, well, subvert societies. They use such terms because nobody wants to support 'communists'. So they masquerade as 'liberals', 'progressives', 'democrats', in the quest for 'social justice' and 'equality'. It's all a lie and a smoke screen.

Remember, these people stack bodies like cordwood when they get fully in power. Bodies of primarily professing Christians.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

Nope.
Why don't you curse the large number of Democrats who have wined and dined and met with Russian diplomats during the obama administration?

There is a big difference between being an elected official and going to political functions and working on diplomacy and various treaties and deals with Russia... and secretly communicating with Russia as they are illegally hacking into your political opposition, and then having a handful of your top cabinet members get caught lying about any communication with Russia during the election.

Hold. Up. This is an incredibly hypocritical (yet truthful) statement. On one hand, you condemn Trump for complimenting Putin. You condemn Franklin Graham for supporting Putin's stance against homosexuality. You condemn any conservative who happens to mention anything good about Putin or Russia.

Then when confronted about obama doing the same exact thing, you actually make a statement that is both truthful and hypocritical -- you claim it's just politics. I mentioned the hypocrisy of it already. Here's the truth in the statement -- it IS political. You said nothing when Obama and Hillary were given Russia uranium. You kept your mouth closed when Obama told Putin he'd have more flexibility after the upcoming election. You were mute when Hillary received payments from the Russians in exchange for her services.[/QUOTE]

There is a big difference between being politically diplomatic... and secretly communicating with Russia as they are illegally hacking into your political opposition's servers, and then having a handful of your top cabinet members get caught lying about any communication with Russia during that period.

So yes, it is alllll about politics. You don't care when it's a liberal who is being complimentary to the Russians or Putin. You only care because it's Trump.

Look, if it were merely Trump and Obama merely complimenting Putin as a world leader and giving due diplomatic respect, I'd agree. But Trump's Campaign has already been proven to have had contact with Russia during an election.... while Russia was ILLEGALLY hacking their political opposition.