STARTLING! LARRY BOOKER'S Latest Message!!!(wait til you see this!!!)

[Thad]

QUESTION
I know that the 5 Men on the list that are spearheading the conference in Tulsa DO NOT agree on all standard issues. Wedding rings are just one of those differences. There was a group of men who formed a fellowhip/conference in the early 80s out here in the west. eventually it broke apart simply because Men could not get along and disagreed on issues such as should a preacher be allowed to drive a luxury car or not.
So, if they couldn't get along then, what should make me think they will not disagree in the future ?? is that a fair question??

Originally Posted by Jekyll

This gets old...the process of bringing the resolution to the floor MANY times broke the theme of individual causes bringing disunity to the organization. This has been said many times before. It's like the kid wearing down the adult by continually asking, "May I?? Can I??? Pleeeeeeeeasse???" The adult finally lets the kid learn the lesson that he was trying to protect the kid from learning.

People kept trying to convince me that my giants were not really giants... I never could figure out why they kept bringing it up, over and over...

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Jekyll

This gets old...the process of bringing the resolution to the floor MANY times broke the theme of individual causes bringing disunity to the organization. This has been said many times before.

I guess we can never raise dues again, because that would be bringing the same issue up?

What you are asking for is an unchangeable constitution.

That is the death knell of any organization - political or religious (I don't know which label suits us better).

[freeatlast]

[QUOTE=Pastor Poster;305902]Uhm, yeah, you pretty much summed up how I feel about it.

Follow me here.

1. Leadership allowed the issue on the ballot.
2. Men had the option to vote for or against it.
3. It passed.
4. The losers are now pulling out cause they didn't get their way.


This leads me to believe SOME of these men have a problem with the leadership and direction of our movement.

Knowing that, I respect their decision to leave.

What's so bad about that?[/QUOTE]


I for one second that emotion....cuz I'm very emotional

[Barb]

Originally Posted by Don Quixote

People kept trying to convince me that my giants were not really giants... I never could figure out why they kept bringing it up, over and over...

Hmmmm...

[dizzyde]

Originally Posted by Thad

Dizzy, there's a pastor in your city that told his congregants that he is the only one preaching "TRUTH" within a 50 mile radius.

That means that your church and at least 50 other churches are not preaching "TRUTH". only HE is preaching " TRUTH"

Thanks Thad, I rest my case! HOW is that right, in anyones eyes? How deluded do you have to be to actually believe that? It just makes me want to scream!

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by dizzyde

Thanks Thad, I rest my case! HOW is that right, in anyones eyes? How deluded do you have to be to actually believe that? It just makes me want to scream!

You're just rebellious.

[freeatlast]

Originally Posted by dizzyde

Thanks Thad, I rest my case! HOW is that right, in anyones eyes? How deluded do you have to be to actually believe that? It just makes me want to scream!

I usta go to a UPC like that...cept the radius was much bigger.

[triumphant1]

Originally Posted by tv1a

****EDITED BY ADMIN******.

This in fact is the confusing contradiction of those who preach the "no TV/control the internet" doctrine of technology holiness standards...

Especially when most of what they preach against on TV can be accessed on the internet....and worse....

[Thad]

WEll Glooooooorrrraaaay! this has just been a LOVELY discussion