A Hebrew or Greek NT?

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

I like it because it uses Hebrew names. Other than that its just another "Alexandrian" type translation.

I don't suppose you have a "primitive text" Bible,
by any chance? I'm having some success translating
Hebrew primitive into English, but it's tedious.

[acerrak]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Ok, and really, I didn't mean to get on
people's interpretation of "tongues,"
I couldn't care less, really.
The fruit of that to me is obviously "confusion."

its ok we agree to disagree

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Ok, and really, I didn't mean to get on
people's interpretation of "tongues,"
I couldn't care less, really.
The fruit of that to me is obviously "confusion."

Hmm, or maybe "division"
is more to the point.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by acerrak

its ok we agree to disagree

Hey, I may yet be "converted" there.
As long as no one preaches it as a requirement,
I'm happy.

[acerrak]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Hey, I may yet be "converted" there.
As long as no one preaches it as a requirement,
I'm happy.

i believe tounges are a gift. i do not believe in the unbiblical doctrine of initial evidence of tounges.

mark 16:16 declares it as a (a) sign not the only sign. so we are agreement on that

[bbyrd009]

That's how I read it too.

[houston]

Originally Posted by acerrak

1 Corinthians 13 (King James Version)

1 Corinthians 13
1Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal

speaking with a language of men and a language of angels
besides language evolves and some languages can be born from nothing. so to say it is some sort of known language is still very broad

purpose of tongues is also stated in the bible. it is to edify oneself. and a tongue and interpretation edifies the body of believers

Hebrew is the language of Angels.

[houston]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Well, understand that I'm not disagreeing that tongues exists,
just that "tongues of men and angels" is prolly way overstretched-
-the point there is that if you don't have love--like, say, insisting
that someone speak in a language unknown to them
in order to demonstrate that they have rec'd the Holy Spirit--
then you are lost anyway.

Your quote of "tongues and interpretation edifying a body of believers"
does not need to be anything other than me standing up in church
with a Word in Spanish for some in the audience (when I don't speak Spanish, say),
and someone interpreting it for those who don't speak Spanish.

Naw. TnI are gifts of the Spirit. It's not a gift if you know the language.

[acerrak]

Originally Posted by houston

Hebrew is the language of Angels.

nah i would disagree. he would have stated it so.their comon tongue of the day was aramaic, but they would read scriptures in hebrew.

I say many people could speak those two plus greek. So with out any evidence on that i would just have to agree to disagree.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by acerrak

i believe tounges are a gift. i do not believe in the unbiblical doctrine of initial evidence of tounges.

mark 16:16 declares it as a (a) sign not the only sign. so we are agreement on that

Sam's http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com...ad.php?t=39668
has an interesting reflection of tongues.