Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


View Poll Results: Adino's statement (in post #1) expresses my understanding concerning water baptism:
Yes 15 30.61%
No 34 69.39%
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #231  
Old 10-03-2007, 01:49 PM
mizpeh mizpeh is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by bishoph View Post
Boy! I think this is fist time I've ever been yelled at in a forum. I am not going to do endless searches to find out where you stand on every topic that comes up just because you may have stated it somewhere in forum-land. It is obvious by your evasion of a yes or no answer where you stand. You do not believe in the necessity of baptism for salvation.
Dan believes in the necessity of water baptism for salvation as a command to be obeyed like loving your brother but it's not necessary to have someone invoke the Lord's name over you during the act of baptism.
__________________
His banner over me is LOVE.... My soul followeth hard after thee....Love one another with a pure heart fervently. Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?

To be a servant of God, it will cost us our total commitment to God, and God alone. His burden must be our burden... Sis Alvear
Reply With Quote
  #232  
Old 10-03-2007, 01:50 PM
philjones
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by bishoph View Post
The rest is simple, there is no need to debate with you about it, because you have your mind already made up, (which is fine...let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind) and you will not answer the questions, or you simply ignore what you cannot repudiate.

Why then do you continue the dialogue?
I have stated this earlier in the thread.

I guess, since Dan changed his mind, he thinks that if he repeats his beliefs often enough someone else might join him. Not likely to happen but it is possible. Might even be probable if he lost the spirit of the martyr and discussed it with civility instead of with an attitude of boxer behind on points in the 15th round of a championship fight.
Reply With Quote
  #233  
Old 10-03-2007, 01:51 PM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by bishoph View Post
The rest is simple, there is no need to debate with you about it, because you have your mind already made up, (which is fine...let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind) and you will not answer the questions, or you simply ignore what you cannot repudiate.

Why then do you continue the dialogue?
BH ... let us all decide what is truth indeed. As for being unable to repudiate ... ROFL.
Reply With Quote
  #234  
Old 10-03-2007, 01:53 PM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by philjones View Post
I have stated this earlier in the thread.

I guess, since Dan changed his mind, he thinks that if he repeats his beliefs often enough someone else might join him. Not likely to happen but it is possible. Might even be probable if he lost the spirit of the martyr and discussed it with civility instead of with an attitude of boxer behind on points in the 15th round of a championship fight.
I know a good "cut" man ... maybe you should get that eye checked out?

Civility? That's new here ... when did that happen?

Phil ... have anymore of that turtlewax?
Reply With Quote
  #235  
Old 10-03-2007, 02:01 PM
bishoph's Avatar
bishoph bishoph is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 952
It is interesting to me that some would say baptism is essential only because it is commanded, but not because it has any salvational merit. That is simply double talk to me!

If this is the case then we must be, at least in part stating that baptism is merely symbolic of an inward work of grace. Which I find hard to substantiate in scripture. The OT was a school master to bring us to Christ, and it is filled with types and shadows, or symbolism. When the New Covenant was enacted, the types/shadows and symbolisms were fulfilled not just re-symbolized.
Reply With Quote
  #236  
Old 10-03-2007, 02:04 PM
BrotherEastman's Avatar
BrotherEastman BrotherEastman is offline
uncharismatic conservative maverick


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
No ... they repent, get baptized and receive the baptism of the HG all in one sitting.
since when?
Reply With Quote
  #237  
Old 10-03-2007, 02:05 PM
BrotherEastman's Avatar
BrotherEastman BrotherEastman is offline
uncharismatic conservative maverick


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Encryptus View Post
Strange, to be in the majority no 3 stepper has stepped up to the issue of someone receiving the HG before "having their sins washed away in baptism"
News flash, ya don't get the HG w/out repentance.
Reply With Quote
  #238  
Old 10-03-2007, 02:05 PM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by bishoph View Post
It is interesting to me that some would say baptism is essential only because it is commanded, but not because it has any salvational merit. That is simply double talk to me!

If this is the case then we must be, at least in part stating that baptism is merely symbolic of an inward work of grace. Which I find hard to substantiate in scripture. The OT was a school master to bring us to Christ, and it is filled with types and shadows, or symbolism. When the New Covenant was enacted, the types/shadows and symbolisms were fulfilled not just re-symbolized.
So you believe in the miracle of the mass ... the wine becomes the blood and the bread his flesh ... it is not symbolic? Hello???

Using your logic ... baptism is an ancient rite that signified confession of faith ... did it change w/ the New Covenant?
Reply With Quote
  #239  
Old 10-03-2007, 02:07 PM
BrotherEastman's Avatar
BrotherEastman BrotherEastman is offline
uncharismatic conservative maverick


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
They believe in 3 steps ... but only a few can remotely defend it. After the pet scriptures are used up ... and the argument of obedience and faith w/o works is refuted ... they usually move on to labeling and marginalizing.
So, you didn't repent? You didn't get baptized? You didn't recieve the HG? Whether or not you got them in this order, you still did some three steppin'!:sshhh
Reply With Quote
  #240  
Old 10-03-2007, 02:08 PM
BrotherEastman's Avatar
BrotherEastman BrotherEastman is offline
uncharismatic conservative maverick


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherri View Post
My mom did this the "backward" way!!
But she still did it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Water Baptism.....Just What Is It For? stmatthew Fellowship Hall 119 01-02-2008 04:35 PM
Do you agree? jwharv Fellowship Hall 2 08-08-2007 12:47 AM
Do you agree????????? jgnix Deep Waters 5 07-13-2007 10:07 PM
The Aaronic Blessing re Water Baptism Iron_Bladder Deep Waters 16 06-25-2007 07:13 AM
Water in the Plan Steve Epley Deep Waters 68 05-16-2007 12:47 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.