WAAAHHHHH ..... Rejected by the AMF.

[Ohio Pastor]

Originally Posted by DAII

My timeline is simple. As I recall, a day or two before I registered I what was initially informed about was described to me as a new forum owned by a sole owner was launched.

I registered on December 11 as per the email I shared in this thread.

I was told that day that I did not meet their requirements... Which seems in the least disingenuous since it appears admin had placed me on a Not Allowed list. The more accurate response would have been is we reserve the right to deny membership for any reason.

Without this knowledge, I made my post yesterday inquiring if anyone knew of any requirements being posted.

According to NLYP..... Go on.

[The Mrs]

So DAII was never welcome at either!

Now we're down to the brass tacks!

[DAII]

Originally Posted by Brother David

" THIS "

I don't see how NLYP was incited in this thread by any post before his initial post in which he offered information about a NOT ALLOWED list.

[The Mrs]

It's not so much about where we are, it's when we are!


(Just heard that quoted on the original Planet of the Apes on AMC right now.)

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by Ohio Pastor

As Bro Griffin can attest to this may have been in the infancy when the ping forum was first introduced. He was apart of that "AMF". That forum didn't fly. Another AMF was started and he wasn't a part of it. That AMF is going great. It was before my involvement with the forum.

FTR we actually think of this as a two part forum. The old ping version is history and no more.

The new and improved version is the real deal.

LOL. Why don't you stop?

[DAII]

Originally Posted by Ohio Pastor

According to NLYP..... Go on.

According to James G too.

Not sure if CP has confirmed this too.

[tbpew]

Is contention and strife some folks goal in spending time on a forum board?

IMO, that is a fundamental indicator of folks who need to get a life.

[RevDWW]

Originally Posted by DAII

My timeline is simple. As I recall, a day or two before I registered I what was initially informed about was described to me as a new forum owned by a sole owner was launched.

I registered on December 11 as per the email I shared in this thread.

I was told that day that I did not meet their requirements... Which seems in the least disingenuous since it appears admin had placed me on a Not Allowed list. The more accurate response would have been is we reserve the right to deny membership for any reason.

Without this knowledge, I made my post yesterday inquiring if anyone knew of any requirements being posted.

Doesn't it kinda go without saying on any private own forum?

Does a club owner have the right to keep someone out of the club who might come in and cuff other members on the head, turn the tables over, smash the chairs, set fire to the curtains and whatnot?

__________________________________________________ _________________
Ok now let's see if we can get furthur clarity on this situation:

Was OP an owner on or about December 11th when DAII alleges he registered and for which it appears he has a rejection notice?

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by DAII

I don't see how NLYP was incited in this thread by any post before his initial post in which he offered information about a NOT ALLOWED list.

I dunno. I'm not keeping score that closely. From what I saw Ohio Pastor was dishing disinformation (to put it nicely) and behaving like a troll before NLYP ever jumped in.

[Thinking]

Originally Posted by Sister Alvear

My husband was NOT accepted in the WPF...because he was a foreigner...lol...

This is very strange, especially considering that the WPF just opened a national Philippines headquarters.

http://www.apostolicnews.org/wpf-new...y-philippines/