Has Rush Limbaugh finally gone too far?

[Twisp]

Nice to finally see a Republican condemning Rush:

http://www.wfsb.com/story/17065315/b...-slut-comments

[Flutecrafter]

Originally Posted by Timmy

Is he too honest?

To honest for some folks, looks like.

[Jared Hanley]

Originally Posted by Twisp

I don't remember her saying that in her testimony. Care to provide a link to her saying that? lol

Here is the full story from ABC:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/...ry?id=15834374

[The Matt]

Her testimony is a joke, but her comments were taken waaaaay out of context.

[Jared Hanley]

I have to admit though that I have pretty strong opinions about this because I am fairly radical in my views on this particular issue. My wife and I don't use contraceptives. That wasn't just my idea. We made that decision together.

Also, I am of the opinion that abortion will never be banned completely until people change their views on contraceptives. I think the recent vote in Mississippi proves that.

[Pressing-On]

I don't see anything wrong with how Rush handled this after listening to the girl's stupid reason for supporting contraception at law school.

Now, here's the story that started all this. It's by a guy name Craig Bannister at Cybercast News Service: "A Georgetown co-ed told Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s hearing that the women in her law school program are having so much sex that they’re going broke, so you and I should pay for their birth control. Speaking at a hearing held by Pelosi to tout Pres. Obama’s mandate that virtually every health insurance plan cover the full cost of contraception and abortion-inducing products, Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke said that it’s too expensive to have sex in law school without mandated insurance coverage. Apparently, four out of every ten co-eds are having so much sex that it's hard to make ends meet if they have to pay for their own contraception, Fluke's research shows." And of course what's sex if the ends aren't meeting?

But Fluke presented research to the committee: four out of every ten co-eds are having so much sex that it's hard to make ends meet if they have to pay for their own contraception. Have you heard of anything more ridiculous? This is flat-out thievery. It's outright ridiculous that taxpayers should pay for the personal sexual desires and habits of everybody, including women, at Georgetown Law. Fluke reported: "Forty percent of the female students at Georgetown Law reported to us that they struggled financially as a result of this policy (Georgetown student insurance not covering contraception)." The poor babes have to buy their own pills. What has gone wrong with our country? What has happened to our country where law students have to buy their own contraceptives? What has happened to us, folks? What have we done with our hearts? How did we become so cruel?

How did we become so heartless? Require each other to pay for the contraceptives of the women law students at Georgetown? Sandra Fluke reported to Pelosi: "It costs a female student $3,000 to have protected sex over the course of her three-year stint in law school, according to her calculations. 'Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school,' Fluke told the hearing. ... That’s a thousand dollars a year of sex -- and, she wants us to pay for it." Now, what does that make her? She wants us to buy her sex. She wants us to pay for her sex, and she went to a congressional committee to close the sale.

It's the right place to do that. Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20..._fluke_remarks

[Cindy]

No personal responsibility, everything should be free. These are our future lawmakers, scary isn't it?

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Cindy

No personal responsibility, everything should be free. These are our future lawmakers, scary isn't it?

Exactly and they are making out that Rush is the one that is wrong.

[trialedbyfire]

He said what I thought, I was just too Christian to say it out loud. Meanwhile this ideology of entitlement is about to destroy this nation.

I don't listen to Rush either by the way.

[Jay]

I did listen to Rush that day. I happen to know that he was going after her for attempting to put tax payers on the hook for contreception. Further, she is a slut. I do not care if she likes the label or not, but when a woman is willing to sleep with a man outside of marriage and without pay, she is an incredibly easy slut. He simply called her what she is. She is immoral, wicked, and attempting to force us to finance her harlotry. Those who support her are like her and will receive the same judgment that she does.


If you do not like that, read the judgments pronounced against Israel for licentious immorality. I am not nearly in the same league as the prophets when it comes to calling out sin. If any here do not like it, that is between you and God, but He has not changed His oppinions of this abomination.