Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-25-2009, 05:59 PM
BrotherEastman's Avatar
BrotherEastman BrotherEastman is offline
uncharismatic conservative maverick


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,356
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Only Way View Post
Lol, I'd have to agree! What's a debate without two sides?!
I have to preach in the morning, and I need a topic. LOL!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-25-2009, 06:02 PM
The Only Way The Only Way is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 56
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrotherEastman View Post
I have to preach in the morning, and I need a topic. LOL!
HA HA! hold on, did you just say that outloud!?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-25-2009, 08:07 PM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

OK Here is my final answer.

1. We can dump the libs and the cons alternately as Prax suggested.

2. We can simply dump Unregistered - they don't contribute a hill of beans anyway, and just breathe good AFF air.

Either way, I am safe.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves

Last edited by Hoovie; 07-25-2009 at 09:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-25-2009, 08:28 PM
Phil Stearns's Avatar
Phil Stearns Phil Stearns is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 167
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover View Post
OK Here is my final answer.

1. We can dump then libs and the cons alternately as Prax suggested.

2. We can simply dump Unregistered - they don't contribute a hill of beans anyway, and just breathe good AFF air.

Either way, I am safe.
Why would you want to "dump" Unregistered??? I know they are quite divisive, but dump them? That seems harsh.

Last edited by Phil Stearns; 07-25-2009 at 08:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-25-2009, 08:32 PM
Phil Stearns's Avatar
Phil Stearns Phil Stearns is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 167
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Stearns View Post
Why would you want to "dump" Unregistered??? I know they are quite divisive, but dump them? That seems harsh.
BUMP!!!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-25-2009, 08:33 PM
BrotherEastman's Avatar
BrotherEastman BrotherEastman is offline
uncharismatic conservative maverick


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,356
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Stearns View Post
Why would you want to "dump" Unregistered??? I know they are quite divisive, but dump them? That seems harsh.
Because Unregistered, as mentioned by our illustrious friend has taking up precious AFF air (or bandwidth). *wink*
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-25-2009, 08:35 PM
Irreligious's Avatar
Irreligious Irreligious is offline
Christ Follower


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 744
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Stearns View Post
Why would you want to "dump" Unregistered???

Thanks Phil. In my ten days here I've survived mocking, condemnation, being pronounced "lost" 14 times, and a myriad of other things. The natives have been quite worked up!
__________________
Who dares accuse us whom God has chosen for his own? Will God? No! HE IS THE ONE who has given us right standing with himself. Who then will condemn us? Will Christ Jesus? No, for HE IS THE ONE who died for us and was raised to life for us and is sitting at the place of highest honor next to God, pleading for us. (Romans 8:33-34)


"The greatest enemy to the movement of Jesus Christ is Christianity". –Erwin McManus
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-25-2009, 08:37 PM
Irreligious's Avatar
Irreligious Irreligious is offline
Christ Follower


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 744
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover View Post
OK Here is my final answer.

1. We can dump then libs and the cons alternately as Prax suggested.

2. We can simply dump Unregistered - they don't contribute a hill of beans anyway, and just breathe good AFF air.

Either way, I am safe.

Thanks Stephen. I feel loved. Maybe you could start a thread and solicit a vote to see if I should be thrown off. And maybe, if the majority wants me gone, I could leave. Would you agree to that?

(I came back on to edit this. On second thought, I'll just let it stand so I can laugh at myself.)
__________________
Who dares accuse us whom God has chosen for his own? Will God? No! HE IS THE ONE who has given us right standing with himself. Who then will condemn us? Will Christ Jesus? No, for HE IS THE ONE who died for us and was raised to life for us and is sitting at the place of highest honor next to God, pleading for us. (Romans 8:33-34)


"The greatest enemy to the movement of Jesus Christ is Christianity". –Erwin McManus

Last edited by Irreligious; 07-25-2009 at 10:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-25-2009, 08:37 PM
Phil Stearns's Avatar
Phil Stearns Phil Stearns is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 167
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irreligious View Post
Thanks Phil. In my ten days here I've survived mocking, condemnation, being pronounced "lost" 14 times, and a myriad of other things. The natives have been quite worked up!
You're welcome I. Beware, it's a lion's den around here. We definitely should not "dump" Unregistered. JMO
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-25-2009, 08:39 PM
BrotherEastman's Avatar
BrotherEastman BrotherEastman is offline
uncharismatic conservative maverick


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,356
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irreligious View Post
Thanks Phil. In my ten days here I've survived mocking, condemnation, being pronounced "lost" 14 times, and a myriad of other things. The natives have been quite worked up!
You know what? I like Unregistered.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hypothetical Moral Question Twisp Fellowship Hall 14 07-25-2009 07:16 PM
Another Banning KWSS1976 Fellowship Hall 7 06-08-2009 03:41 PM
I am banning myself Brett Prince Fellowship Hall 107 08-31-2007 09:37 PM
Atlanta Considers Banning Baggy Pants TK Burk Fellowship Hall 5 08-23-2007 08:15 PM
CPU Fan question Praxeas Tech Talk: with Bit & Byte 2 06-27-2007 02:01 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.