 |
|

07-25-2009, 12:11 PM
|
 |
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
Hypothetical Banning Question
It has come to our attention we are using far too much bandwidth and need to knock off a few of our least valuable posters.
This move is absolutely necessary so the rest of us can enjoy the freedom of continuing our discussions on magic hair, legalism and racist professors.
I do apologize in advance - sorry.
Now who shall we dump?
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Last edited by Hoovie; 07-25-2009 at 12:14 PM.
|

07-25-2009, 02:20 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In His Hands
Posts: 13,918
|
|
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover
It has come to our attention we are using far too much bandwidth and need to knock off a few of our least valuable posters.
This move is absolutely necessary so the rest of us can enjoy the freedom of continuing our discussions on magic hair, legalism and racist professors.
I do apologize in advance - sorry.
Now who shall we dump?

|
So would it be a hypothetical suicide if I banned myself into the abyss of an empty life without AFF?
__________________
"The choices we make reveal the true nature of our character."
|

07-25-2009, 02:28 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 167
|
|
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover
It has come to our attention we are using far too much bandwidth and need to knock off a few of our least valuable posters.
This move is absolutely necessary so the rest of us can enjoy the freedom of continuing our discussions on magic hair, legalism and racist professors.
I do apologize in advance - sorry.
Now who shall we dump?

|
Stephen, are you bored today?
|

07-25-2009, 02:45 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,596
|
|
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
So would it be a hypothetical suicide if I banned myself into the abyss of an empty life without AFF?
|
Hypothetically speaking?
Jermyn, let us know how we can help!
I have my cuzin you know, vinnie!
LOL - Jokin!
|

07-25-2009, 04:16 PM
|
 |
mary
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,002
|
|
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question
I'd volunteer... Hypothetically. So that the other hypothetical people who might be on the hypothetical dump list don't have to hypothetically be banned.
|

07-25-2009, 04:25 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,791
|
|
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question
I have an idea...one month it will be the Ultra cons...then we will unban them and ban the Ultra Libs...and so on and so on
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|

07-25-2009, 05:15 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,596
|
|
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
I have an idea...one month it will be the Ultra cons...then we will unban them and ban the Ultra Libs...and so on and so on
|
Prax,
You can start right now, they are getting pretty vicious over on the other thread!
|

07-25-2009, 05:30 PM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,195
|
|
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJJJ
Prax,
You can start right now, they are getting pretty vicious over on the other thread!
|
Yeah your right they are getting vicious but if he reversed it we can get them off faster
|

07-25-2009, 05:33 PM
|
 |
uncharismatic conservative maverick
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,356
|
|
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
I have an idea...one month it will be the Ultra cons...then we will unban them and ban the Ultra Libs...and so on and so on
|
Now your just taking the fun out of it.
|

07-25-2009, 05:54 PM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 56
|
|
Re: Hypothetical Banning Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrotherEastman
Now your just taking the fun out of it.
|
Lol, I'd have to agree! What's a debate without two sides?!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
|