Ministerial Ethics, Dropping Out and TV: Did You Forget You Agreed to This?

[rrford]

Originally Posted by stmatthew

You know, I here cries about this all the time, but it seems to be that the majority wanted this to happen, and continued on, just as now the majority wanted tv, and will continue on. Those that can stay will stay. Those that can't will go on.

Quit making sense, would ya? There is no man so blind as the one who will not see.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by ILG

Is that why people like Truly Blessed left because he basically felt pushed out?? Because everyone had supposedly come into the "unity of the faith"?? Is that why hoards leave every year? You can't vote an organization into unity of faith.

But you can be contentious as to it's disunity ... see Westburg resolution.

This is becoming almost comical.

[rrford]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

OMG!!! Are you serious??? Do you think those w/ a PCI or PAJC view were joining on this condition???

Are they now teaching this revisionist history in Bible Schools?

Do you think Paul wrote these words in Ephesians because they too had differing views on salvation.

RR ... let's be intellectually honest.

Waiting for you to offer a better explanation for "not contedning...until we come to a unity of the faith."

[ILG]

Well, my bathwater is calling me.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by rrford

Quit making sense, would ya? There is no man so blind as the one who will not see.

Remember our little conversation about the "tyranny of the majority"?

When the two sides entered this compact they sought unity ... not uniformity.

[rrford]

Originally Posted by Darcie

Also? So we agree there's been a violation?

Where there are codes of ethics and men there will always be violations.

But no, the argument you and Dan are postulating holds no intellectually honest water.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by rrford

Waiting for you to offer a better explanation for "not contedning...until we come to a unity of the faith."

History teaches different .. those there have spoken about the intents ... and not once have they taken your position ... NOT ONCE.

[Darcie]

Originally Posted by rrford

Where there are codes of ethics and men there will always be violations.

But no, the argument you and Dan are postulating holds no intellectually honest water.

That's right, it would only be a good arguement if it were directed towards the Libs.

[stmatthew]

I think some have lived in their past hurts for so long that they have robbed themselves of their present and future. Paul stated that he FORGOT those things which were behind him, so that he could embrace his destiny. You will never find your future as long as you are living in the past.

Someone take this microphone before I preach!

[SDG]

Originally Posted by rrford

Where there are codes of ethics and men there will always be violations.

But no, the argument you and Dan are postulating holds no intellectually honest water.

Hilarious ... to hear those not in control now evading the rule of law.