STARTLING! LARRY BOOKER'S Latest Message!!!(wait til you see this!!!)

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Thad

are you referring mainly to preachers ???

I referring to anyone that tells something to enhance their point.

Originally Posted by Thad

bump for steadfast

Thad, it didn't look too good to do the whole 'this is what was said' followed by the 'I didn't know for sure' stuff but... hey... we've seen that before. Honestly, the 'so many things said here' statement was NOT solely in reference to this thread alone but to a dozen other threads that try to make Bro. Booker out to be a vicious ogre on so many levels.

Again, he's simply not. I spent days with the man... spoke of MANY subjects (including this forum)... dealt with many issues (including the TV stuff) and NOT ONE TIME did the man say a negative word about anybody or be anything less than a gentleman.

This forum has had the man turning in his license when he hadn't... and various other things time and again. They were all fabrications of what 'someone told someone told someone'... just making them rumors at best and liars at worst!

I'm not saying that everyone has to agree with Bro. Booker on all issues. I do think, however, that those with carnal agendas disqualify themselves from having a legitimate opinion. Additionally, those without facts (even if they don't have agendas) should value their walk with God more than to jeopardize it over outright lies or half truths.

[ILG]

There was a time I would have been totally on board with the ultra-cons. I'm glad I'm not.

[Thad]

Originally Posted by triumphant1

If you folks want to discuss and defend it....why don't you just go to:

www.inlandlighthouse.com

and listen to the sermon....it is titled "Protecting the bean patch".

Great point Triumpant! thanks

[ILG]

Originally Posted by Steadfast

Thad, it didn't look too good to do the whole 'this is what was said' followed by the 'I didn't know for sure' stuff but... hey... we've seen that before. Honestly, the 'so many things said here' statement was NOT solely in reference to this thread alone but to a dozen other threads that try to make Bro. Booker out to be a vicious ogre on so many levels.

Again, he's simply not. I spent days with the man... spoke of MANY subjects (including this forum)... dealt with many issues (including the TV stuff) and NOT ONE TIME did the man say a negative word about anybody or be anything less than a gentleman.

This forum has had the man turning in his license when he hadn't... and various other things time and again. They were all fabrications of what 'someone told someone told someone'... just making them rumors at best and liars at worst!

I'm not saying that everyone has to agree with Bro. Booker on all issues. I do think, however, that those with carnal agendas disqualify themselves from having a legitimate opinion. Additionally, those without facts (even if they don't have agendas) should value their walk with God more than to jeopardize it over outright lies or half truths.

Larry Booker is a very kind, good man who just happens to be very conservative. He is living what he believes.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

I referring to anyone that tells something to enhance their point.

Enhance or embellish?

Whatever happened to preaching the Gospel???

Anecdotal preaching without scriptural support .... gets me SICK ... cuz I leave HUNGRY

[Thad]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

I anticipate more rhetoric coming from the mini-kingdom pulpits as we approach the HOLY CONVOCATION and CORONATION.

Legitimacy is in.

that was a little unkind Dan

Originally Posted by ILG

Larry Booker is a very kind, good man who just happens to be very conservative. He is living what he believes.

ILG, that's too much solid reasoning for some here to handle. By the way, it's also a very good, very accurate post.

Thanks.

[triumphant1]

Originally Posted by Steadfast

Thad, it didn't look too good to do the whole 'this is what was said' followed by the 'I didn't know for sure' stuff but... hey... we've seen that before. Honestly, the 'so many things said here' statement was NOT solely in reference to this thread alone but to a dozen other threads that try to make Bro. Booker out to be a vicious ogre on so many levels.

Again, he's simply not. I spent days with the man... spoke of MANY subjects (including this forum)... dealt with many issues (including the TV stuff) and NOT ONE TIME did the man say a negative word about anybody or be anything less than a gentleman.

This forum has had the man turning in his license when he hadn't... and various other things time and again. They were all fabrications of what 'someone told someone told someone'... just making them rumors at best and liars at worst!

I'm not saying that everyone has to agree with Bro. Booker on all issues. I do think, however, that those with carnal agendas disqualify themselves from having a legitimate opinion. Additionally, those without facts (even if they don't have agendas) should value their walk with God more than to jeopardize it over outright lies or half truths.

If you will take the time to listen to the sermon:

www.inlandlighthouse.com

"Protecting the Bean Patch"

You can authoritatlively say, "LB NEVER said in the sermon that he was "Leaving" the UPC....but since you havn't let me do it for you...

LB never said that he was leaving the UPC...only alluded to the fact that he might would 'seek other fellowship" and "would always fellowship the UC UPC whether they stay or leave"...but he didn't come right out and say, "I'm leaving."

I do think that he left the impression that he might...and that he was rallying the troops around the importance of being holiness, oneness, Apostolics and not "UPC"....he certainly rallied them around him and not around the org....

[Thad]

Originally Posted by Steadfast

Thad, it didn't look too good to do the whole 'this is what was said' followed by the 'I didn't know for sure' stuff but... hey... we've seen that before. Honestly, the 'so many things said here' statement was NOT solely in reference to this thread alone but to a dozen other threads that try to make Bro. Booker out to be a vicious ogre on so many levels.

Again, he's simply not. I spent days with the man... spoke of MANY subjects (including this forum)... dealt with many issues (including the TV stuff) and NOT ONE TIME did the man say a negative word about anybody or be anything less than a gentleman.

This forum has had the man turning in his license when he hadn't... and various other things time and again. They were all fabrications of what 'someone told someone told someone'... just making them rumors at best and liars at worst!

I'm not saying that everyone has to agree with Bro. Booker on all issues. I do think, however, that those with carnal agendas disqualify themselves from having a legitimate opinion. Additionally, those without facts (even if they don't have agendas) should value their walk with God more than to jeopardize it over outright lies or half truths.

Have you heard the sermon? I really felt like i tried to be as accuarte as possible and clarified wherever needed and necessary.
If this was his statements and he stands by it, how can it be called lies and an attack on him ?