Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
I agree with your analysis here, however I still think that there's a ball in Lee Stoneking's court to respond as well. Brother Boora will have to answer for his calls and misrepresentations himself, but LS has - at least in my mind - an obligation to respond as well when someone has claimed to be representing him in a legal manner.
While looking for a Boora in the ILEX database I came across several cases of misconduct by "Legal Executives." One particular case involved a Legal Executive who signed some papers on behalf of her client instead of having that client sign as required. She essentially misrepresented herself as acting on behalf of her client without her client's knowledge. That got her a two year suspension.
Can Lee help our understanding here? Was this entire AFF board threatened with being "shut down" by his legal representatives as it was stated on the AMF board?
|
I totally understand where you are coming from, I do also believe that several individuals supposedly from the Stoneking camp have claimed he had no knowledge.
While a denial from the man himself would be great, I can also understand in light of the HMH mania which permeates this forum from time to time why he would hesitate to have direct communication here of any sort. Especially in this case where there is zero evidence of him directing or even approving of any of these events.
Having said that, yeah it would be nice if he would either join us or at least send correspondence!
As to the shutting down of AFF, it was Anderson and Wilson who threatened that legal action was in play. While they can both now claim to be duped by KB (and they probably were) it still stands that for some reason they thought that was a good thing. What were they thinking? I don’t like what you are saying so I will sue you- is not a valid cause for legal action.