While I cannot/do not "officially" speak "for" AST....I do have some knowledge of their structure and accreditation. AST originally was accredited via a partnership with Patten University (Oakland, CA) through which students of AST received credits with Patten and received two diplomas, one from AST and one from Patten.
Hope University was began in 1928 as Pacific Bible Seminary (Church of Christ if I recall) and received accreditation in 1969. (WASC http://registration.wascsenior.org/i...px?accessID=79) Just as many universities have several schools under their umbrella (i.e. school of medicine, school of law etc.) a little over a year ago AST became Hope's "School of Theology." As such it was the first fully accredited Apostolic college/university.
See above info that proves that Hope and AST are accredited and legit!
No multi level marketing here.....Hope is affiliated with CCCU but maintains accreditation through WASC....and AST is now Hope's "School of Theology"
Indeed, maybe the first fully accredited. But it was piggy-back accredition. UGST is itself, as a scholastic entity, fully accredited. That's a HUGE deal.
This is amazing that Hope offered it's theology arm to the AST guys. Again, it's known by everyone that Hope is a liberal arts school. They aren't known for theology. No other theology-focused school would do such a thing.
I have just discovered that you are bogus and appear to be anti Lee Stoneking in the process you, and no doubt the authors of other recently received requests for information, have mixed up at least 2 different bodies to support you unfounded views about SEU. I doubt if you ever wished to study with SEU or anywhere else. You are asked to acknowledge, as publicly as you published, that you have deliberately tried to mislead me and that in doing so you have mixed at least two bodies to assist you, that should then be the end of the matter.
__________________
"Beware lest you lose the substance by grasping at the shadow." ~Aesop
I have just discovered that you are bogus and appear to be anti Lee Stoneking in the process you, and no doubt the authors of other recently received requests for information, have mixed up at least 2 different bodies to support you unfounded views about SEU. I doubt if you ever wished to study with SEU or anywhere else. You are asked to acknowledge, as publicly as you published, that you have deliberately tried to mislead me and that in doing so you have mixed at least two bodies to assist you, that should then be the end of the matter.
I have just discovered that you are bogus and appear to be anti Lee Stoneking in the process you, and no doubt the authors of other recently received requests for information, have mixed up at least 2 different bodies to support you unfounded views about SEU. I doubt if you ever wished to study with SEU or anywhere else. You are asked to acknowledge, as publicly as you published, that you have deliberately tried to mislead me and that in doing so you have mixed at least two bodies to assist you, that should then be the end of the matter.
Yeah, but... who's Lee Stoneking? That's what I wanna know!
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty
BishopH, in other words, AST has had the trappings of full accredition, but they themselves have not been put to the same academic rigor to make sure it's instructors, curriculum, testing, etc meet the standards. It's by way of relationship with Patten and now Hope. These colleges, in essence, are brokering out their accredition.
I have just discovered that you are bogus and appear to be anti Lee Stoneking in the process you, and no doubt the authors of other recently received requests for information, have mixed up at least 2 different bodies to support you unfounded views about SEU. I doubt if you ever wished to study with SEU or anywhere else. You are asked to acknowledge, as publicly as you published, that you have deliberately tried to mislead me and that in doing so you have mixed at least two bodies to assist you, that should then be the end of the matter.
How vanilla is John Johnson ... I guess its more alluring than Count Grimaldi.
The identity of John Johnson and his links, if any, to this web of deception is intriguing.
I have just discovered that you are bogus and appear to be anti Lee Stoneking in the process you, and no doubt the authors of other recently received requests for information, have mixed up at least 2 different bodies to support you unfounded views about SEU. I doubt if you ever wished to study with SEU or anywhere else. You are asked to acknowledge, as publicly as you published, that you have deliberately tried to mislead me and that in doing so you have mixed at least two bodies to assist you, that should then be the end of the matter.
Is Don Johnson an American? He writes in broken English.
Linear Mode
