JUST PREACHERS MAJOR Crackdown! turning WPF???????

[Michael Phelps]

Originally Posted by George

What are you not comprehending in this thread??????? It was NEVER about people being upset they couldn't join JP. It was legitimate MEMBERS OF JP who had their access restricted for no apparent reason. Apparently you, too, have not read this entire thread. If you find my responses to Elder Epley you can read what happened and how it is being corrected. It is all of you people who don't closely read the thread that cause all the fuss.

This is the second time you've jumped me, and frankly, I don't appreciate it. I was responding to A SPECIFIC POST on this thread, not the thread itself.

Now, please go away and don't respond to any more of my posts, I will greatly appreciate it.

[Ron]

Originally Posted by Rhoni

JP's have a right to their own private club...Don't you just love cliques...especially the ones you are denied access to?

Blessings, Rhoni

Rhoni, it is a forum called Just Preachers, that means it is open for Preachers (Pastors Evangelist, Assistants, & thier wives) it is also for those women who are Preachers.
Whether one agrees with women preachers is another story.

No discrimination here.

[George]

Originally Posted by Rhoni

That may have been what happened but they should have explained to me my banishment because I had been honest and posted very appropriately. I forgive them BTW - It isn't worth messing up my spirit over.

Blessings, Rhoni

That's the truth!

[TRIPLE E]

Originally Posted by NLYP

You know...when I got the call about this ASININE thread......I thought it was just Mark being Mark....and turns out that IS all it is...

I am (PROUDLY) the most liberal poster on JP....there has NEVER been a "weeding out" of anybody except liars that join under a false name and then get caught.

This is dumb....

Thanks for the generalization but it has happened to me and I am not in this category.

[George]

Originally Posted by Esther

I don't know that I necessarily agree with this statement.

A pastor can teach what is right but that in no way means folks we do as he says.

Read my entire sentence and catch the word "most." Every church has rebels but the overall look and perspective of the church is that of the pastor. You can often recognize who their pastor is just by seeing them in a mall, restaurant, etc.

[Ron]

Originally Posted by TRIPLE E

Thanks for the generalization but it has happened to me and I am not in this category.

Triple E, have you contacted Admin @ J/P to see what the problem is?

If you haven't anything them is pure speculation.

JMHO

[Amos]

Members with zero or 1 post and perhaps members who haven't logged on in a long time were placed in the "checkout" category, I understand.

Just an attempt to verify membership.

[George]

Originally Posted by Amos

If your friend is a non-posting member, then this may explain why.

"Lurkers" who never post are more likely to be people signed up under false pretenses than someone who regularly interacts.

All he has to do is provide a little information or perhaps a reference that will verify his identity.

He provided all his pertinent information when he signed up.

[George]

Originally Posted by Amos

If all those liars are there, then it explains why an attempt is being made to cull the membership.

You have just answered your own question.

I didn't have a question to answer.

[Pastor Keith]

Originally Posted by Amos

Members with zero or 1 post and perhaps members who haven't logged on in a long time were placed in the "checkout" category, I understand.

Just an attempt to verify membership.

Care to guess why I was banned, defending the wife of a pastor, which I would do for any person regardless of their affliation or convictions?