Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > The Library > Canadian Flavour
Facebook

Notices

Canadian Flavour FROM C2C ~The Canadian Corner~


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #991  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:10 AM
Maple Leaf Maple Leaf is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 889
Thank you to all who are helping us reach the top five.

We only have about 160 posts to go.

We may have to enlist Jerry Lee and have a post-a-thon, but we will make it to top five by the end of September.
Reply With Quote
  #992  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:22 AM
ALVIN's Avatar
ALVIN ALVIN is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRIPLE E View Post
Hooked on facebook perhaps!
Facebook is an interesting place to visit. One interesting topic I came across there was "Harvey Camp." Here are some comments from the Harvey Camp Group.
  • I wish we still had our campgrounds at Harvey Lake.

  • I attended one of the services at summer summit a few years ago and that was enough for me. I miss Harvey Camp!!

  • I never gp to this Summer Summit, although I did this year and was so discouraged over the amount of time taken for the offering, by the time the preacher took the floor, most had left the building, if just mentally. Bring back a camp ground for campers to enjoy.

  • It is NOT the same anymore at all. It does not have that "Camp atmosphere" that we all grew to love. I really miss it. It was the BEST!!!

  • It would be nice to see our District put an effort into establishing a campground again.
Reply With Quote
  #993  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:24 AM
Coonskinner Coonskinner is offline
Non-Resident Redneck


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
Maple, I'll help if you promise not to vanish into the ether once it gets there.

Your posts make for some good reading, an oasis of wit in what can at times seem like a desert of inspipid verbiage.

How I miss Charis and Barnabas and a few other names...

Barnabas wrote a post on FCF that I have kicked myself over and over again for not copying and saving.

It was in response to some neophyte calling for the abolition of the institution of the local church.

The post expressed how the current model was the product of many generations of thought and prayer and trial and error, and how itwould be a shame to scrap it all.

One line that I always remebered described those who, like the author he was responding to, were always tearing down the church.

As I recall, it went something like this:

"In the profession, we call them goats."

LOL!

Those were the days.

BTW, I have been visiting with a brother of yours (biologically speaking) over at the members only club.

Seems like a sharp fellow.
Reply With Quote
  #994  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:37 AM
TRIPLE E's Avatar
TRIPLE E TRIPLE E is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 775
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullwinkle View Post
I too will do my part.
Why do I keep hearing about a southside church in Fredrikton?
When is the new work starting in Dieppe?
Is Bishop L really going to settle in and pastor Four Falls?
Never heard about a southside church in Fredericton? Do you mean a UPC?
Heard a couple rumours about two different individuals going to start churches in Dieppe? Neither of them I think would be UPC.
And Four Falls already has a pastor and is doing well.

PS. Say Hi to Rocky for me!
Reply With Quote
  #995  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:45 AM
Maple Leaf Maple Leaf is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner View Post
Maple, I'll help if you promise not to vanish into the ether once it gets there.

Your posts make for some good reading, an oasis of wit in what can at times seem like a desert of inspipid verbiage.

How I miss Charis and Barnabas and a few other names...

Barnabas wrote a post on FCF that I have kicked myself over and over again for not copying and saving.

It was in response to some neophyte calling for the abolition of the institution of the local church.

The post expressed how the current model was the product of many generations of thought and prayer and trial and error, and how itwould be a shame to scrap it all.

One line that I always remebered described those who, like the author he was responding to, were always tearing down the church.

As I recall, it went something like this:

"In the profession, we call them goats."

LOL!

Those were the days.

BTW, I have been visiting with a brother of yours (biologically speaking) over at the members only club.

Seems like a sharp fellow.
As much as it pains me to admit it I do have a brother who is a "member." Every family has its skeletons.

Yup! Sharp as a hoe, that's him alright.

I have some random posts saved from the FCF days. If I can find the post that you referenced, I'll post it here.
Reply With Quote
  #996  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:50 AM
Maple Leaf Maple Leaf is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 889
Here it is. I deleted some monikers to protect the guilty.

(The unquoted portions are Barnabas' contributions)

Ah, the true beauty of the internet; it gives a voice to every kind of bizarre belief system. Christ has been building His church for two thousand years, and now we want to dream of destroying generations of thought, devotion, and work. The real call here is to embrace an offbeat interpretation of the Bible, to indulge in paranoid delusions, and to reject the institutional Church which has been the greatest force for missions effort the world has ever known.

Quote:
Meet in houses and feel no need to build a special meeting place.
What a great idea. God was mistaken about the Tabernacle and the Temple, and we don't need Church buildings. Take away the Church building, get rid of the Church's community identity. Let's dream of a day when the Church becomes invisible and ineffective. Pentecostalism has grown for a hundred years, building church buildings wherever they went; let's forget that and meet in tiny groups in houses until we become as irrelevant as other groups that have chosen that route. If we really want to lose our influence in society, we could build communes; why only go half way?

Quote:
Give more of our resources to the poor rather than heep them upon ourselves for big nice buildings with a church staff.
Here's another good one. I've never met a godly person who didn't love the house of God; the godly people I've met have always had a heart to build as good a house for God as they possibly could. I suspect that this attitude grows more out of stinginess than out of a love for the poor. The author may be a true advocate for the poor and live in a shack so that he can do more to feed them, I don't know. In my community, the people who feed the poor are the same ones who love the church buildings that they have sacrificed to build.

Quote:
Lead each other more rather than putting so much emphasis on one part of the 5 fold ministry.
Now here's an attitude I've met before. People who don't want a shepherd; in the business, we call them goats.

Quote:
Yeah it does require study. Of course we are compelled to do just that. I have no idea why I didn't expect the rants but, alas, I didn't. I just forget that, generally, you cannot have any calm discussion or ask even a simple question that even remotely questions status quo. You will, without question, be met with strong responses filled with personal slants telling you what type of attitude you have and how backward your thinking is. I simply asked a question. I attend a local church building. I pay tithes. I have a pastor. I simply asked a question. But we just can't go there. It is beyond discussion. It is taboo. It is not convention to even think about it. Oh well... I thought it would be fun. I was wrong.

Hey there ******, this is FCF, you're not allowed to go "wee, wee, wee," all the way home. Thicken your skin, support your opinions, and we can have some discussion. How can a response be personal when we don't have any idea who you are?

You've proposed the spiritual equivalent of a nuclear holocaust; go ahead and trot out your arguments to convince us it's a good idea to push the button.

This is about as calm as I get and I can assure you that I'm having fun. If you don't like strong responses, don't post strong posts. When you get up on a soap box around here, you become a target. That's only a problem if your position won't stand up to scrutiny.

Boy, I love Mondays on FCF. I'll bet we wind up with some deleted threads once TT shows up.
__________________
The more one learns the more he understands his ignorance.
I am simply an ignorant man, trying to lessen his ignorance.
(Barnabas Sackett)
Reply With Quote
  #997  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:54 AM
Coonskinner Coonskinner is offline
Non-Resident Redneck


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
Bravo!!!!

I won't make the same mistake twice; with your permission, this is going into that special file where I save some of the gems I have picked up along the way.

Thanks, Brother.
Reply With Quote
  #998  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:57 AM
Maple Leaf Maple Leaf is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 889
Speaking of Truth Triumphs. Here is an exchange between Charis and Truth Triumphs, iniated by Chicago Pastor with a little Tribble thrown in for good measure. (The unquoted parts originate with Charis)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoPastor
So has everyone decided to vote FOR TV yet at GC jk

Pastor From Oprahville:

If I am not mistaken, a GC vote will never have the power to rescind the UPCI's position on television; it may modify the position to allow evangelistic use, but it will not allow television ownership.

The tragedy of the television issue is that it could have been dealt with effectively by a position paper and personal conviction, instead it became a statute that divides good men, sees some signing one thing and doing another, and that produces endless debate and recriminatory comments on FCF.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthTriumphs
A GC vote can accomplish *anything*, though in some cases it will have to be ratified district to disrict. Votes on the floor of the GC are a legal business action, and can accomplish anything from commending Cleveland Becton's piano work to disbanding the UPC while assigning its assets to the Salvation Army.

Perhaps I should have phrased my comments thusly:

Quote:
If I am not mistaken, a GC vote alone will never have the power to rescind the UPCI's position on television; it may modify the position to allow evangelistic use, but it will not allow television ownership.
Can you foresee a time when the UPCI leadership would allow such a motion to come to the conference floor? If so, could it be anticipated that such a motion for change in the AOF regarding television would pass a district by district vote without shattering the unity of the church?


Quote:
Originally Posted by pastortribble
TV is the greatest medium in the world to spread the message of the love of CHRIST !! We should all use it if we are able and if not then we can just enjoy the good stuff that's on it !!

Viva le TV !!

The greatest medium? Television is a poor substitute for face-to-face communication of the Gospel.

There is very little television programming that draws the Holy Ghost filled heart. I have a television, use it very sparingly, and find your pro-tv comments disconcerting; I can only imagine how truly bizarre the prohibitionists must find your postings about television to be.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthTriumphs
We will immediately vote to change the rules of the day, and unveil the details of our plan, complete with financing, to put Vaughn Morton on Coast to coast television, prime time top network.

"Harvest Time" has served as a forerunner for the coming television broadcasts, breaking down the constituencies resistance to mass media and perfecting programming. America won't know what has happened to their televisions.
Reply With Quote
  #999  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:57 AM
Coonskinner Coonskinner is offline
Non-Resident Redneck


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
I have thought about that post a lot of times...I am glad I mentioned it this morning, and that you had a copy of it.
Reply With Quote
  #1000  
Old 09-12-2007, 07:02 AM
Maple Leaf Maple Leaf is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner View Post
I have thought about that post a lot of times...I am glad I mentioned it this morning, and that you had a copy of it.
Anything to move us into contention for a top five position.


After I posted, I realized that this is the 1000th post on this thread. It really should contain something profound and significant. Here is a nugget of wisdom that I mined from my FCF files:


"You can't rollerskate in a buffalo herd."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentecostals in Canada Consapostolic1 Canadian Flavour 59 10-24-2007 02:16 PM
To All X-NBer's & Those Who Love Canada Monkeyman Canadian Flavour 9 05-21-2007 08:35 AM
Religious Police in Canada...are we next? Praxeas The Newsroom 4 05-09-2007 02:28 PM
USA vs Canada ManOfWord Fellowship Hall 6 05-03-2007 12:03 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by coksiw

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.