Quote:
Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam
I'm not beating up Mike LOL. Just adding a few ommitted details to his exampled verses.
Your views are interesting and your points are tough. Some of those passages have been a thorn here for years and I read everything written ever attributed to Jesus or translated about Jesus working it out. Stuff long thought burned back when the biblical books were assembled. Banned gospels, all of it. The interpretations offered in answer seem contradictory to me. Been the source of some bitter words here. Not my intention today.
I didn't chime in to debate for sure. It's just an interesting thread.
|
Great. A little history on myself.
I have taught the "incarnation" for many years and muffled those unanswerable scriptures myself all that time.
Reading the Bible in this presupposition mode caused me to think it was "trin biased translation", as I sought to eliminate words and make the 2 entities into 1.
I took some time off from ministry to check everything out and noticed that all of Christianity(both trin and oneness), was related and joined by the hip by "hypostatic union(dual nature)".
Once I saw the trins' position, I realized the Catholic Church was the mother of all the incarnationists.
Now, I read the Bible as it states and all the pieces of the puzzle fit.
My proposition is "God did not become a man, but a man became God", which is clearly seen in scripture.
The first Adam was made a living soul, but the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.