Mueller needs to bow out of Russia investigation

[aegsm76]

link
http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-ob...ussian-crimes/
snippets
It turns out the Obama administration knew the Russians were engaged in bribery, kickbacks and extortion in order to gain control of US atomic resources — yet still OK’d that 2010 deal to give Moscow control of one-fifth of America’s uranium. This reeks.
But now The Hill reports that the FBI in 2009 had collected substantial evidence — eyewitnesses backed by documents — of money-laundering, blackmail and bribery by Russian nuclear officials, all aimed at growing “Vladimir Putin’s atomic-energy business inside the United States” in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
There’s more: Until September 2013, the FBI director was Robert Mueller — who’s now the special counsel probing Russian meddling in the 2016 election. It’s hard to see how he can be trusted in that job unless he explains what he knew about this Obama-era cover-up.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by aegsm76

link
http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-ob...ussian-crimes/
snippets
It turns out the Obama administration knew the Russians were engaged in bribery, kickbacks and extortion in order to gain control of US atomic resources — yet still OK’d that 2010 deal to give Moscow control of one-fifth of America’s uranium. This reeks.
But now The Hill reports that the FBI in 2009 had collected substantial evidence — eyewitnesses backed by documents — of money-laundering, blackmail and bribery by Russian nuclear officials, all aimed at growing “Vladimir Putin’s atomic-energy business inside the United States” in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
There’s more: Until September 2013, the FBI director was Robert Mueller — who’s now the special counsel probing Russian meddling in the 2016 election. It’s hard to see how he can be trusted in that job unless he explains what he knew about this Obama-era cover-up.

Well, if he knew about what was going on in 2009, he would know what would be completely out of place in 2015 and 2016.

Why would you want Mueller bow out-- is it because he is hot on the trail to something?

[aegsm76]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Well, if he knew about what was going on in 2009, he would know what would be completely out of place in 2015 and 2016.

Why would you want Mueller bow out-- is it because he is hot on the trail to something?

If (and it is an if) it is found out that Mueller knew the Russians should have been exposed during previous investigation (and committed crimes).
Then, he was part of a cover-up of their actions, which would have obviously made them bolder in further actions.
If he was part of the cover-up, then, he could cover-up things again.
Sort of like having a proven liar on the witness stand.

[Aquila]

They're all corrupt.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by aegsm76

If (and it is an if) it is found out that Mueller knew the Russians should have been exposed during previous investigation (and committed crimes).
Then, he was part of a cover-up of their actions, which would have obviously made them bolder in further actions.
If he was part of the cover-up, then, he could cover-up things again.
Sort of like having a proven liar on the witness stand.

Like an experienced hacker using his skills to catch a hacker.

In fact, if Mueller is involved in what you have alluded to, then I agree with you that he should step aside-- immediately.

Still, that wouldn't absolve 45 and his clan of all of their alleged wrong-doings.

[Aquila]

They're all so corrupt at that level, would anyone be qualified to serve as a special prosecutor? lol

[n david]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Still, that wouldn't absolve 45 and his clan of all of their alleged wrong-doings.

Big word ... "alleged." None of which have been proven. Dems like to keep talking about the allegations, but after months of open and closed Congressional interviews there's been not one shred of evidence proving any of these allegations are true.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

Big word ... "alleged." None of which have been proven. Dems like to keep talking about the allegations, but after months of open and closed Congressional interviews there's been not one shred of evidence proving any of these allegations are true.

That remains to be seen.

Just because they don't instantly jump on evidence and prosecute, it doesn't mean there isn't any evidence.

Don't get me wrong, at the end of it all they might not have any substantial evidence of any wrong doing. But then again... they might. We'll have to wait and see.

Maybe the investigation is taking so long because Mueller wants to find out which side will offer the most bribery money.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Aquila

That remains to be seen.

Just because they don't instantly jump on evidence and prosecute, it doesn't mean there isn't any evidence.

Don't get me wrong, at the end of it all they might not have any substantial evidence of any wrong doing. But then again... they might. We'll have to wait and see.

Maybe the investigation is taking so long because Mueller wants to find out which side will offer the most bribery money.

Even the Democrat co-chair of one of the committees investigating the Russia farce has admitted there has been NOTHING, no evidence and no testimony which proves Trump and Russia colluded to steal the election.

"That remains to be seen?" How long are you libs going to keep this farce going? How much time do you need to investigate? It's ridiculous. Libs are fortunate to have the backing of the media, because this is a partisan witch hunt. The GOP had more evidence of wrongdoing in Benghazi and still Dems and the media whined about it being a partisan witch hunt.

Actually, I really shouldn't want the investigation to stop. Because the longer it has gone on, the more dirt and scandal is brought to light about Clinton and the Obama admin.

[aegsm76]

More info on Mueller
link
http://news.wgbh.org/2017/10/17/silv...ried-entrap-me
snippets
But I have known Mueller during key moments of his career as a federal prosecutor. My experience has taught me to approach whatever he does in the Trump investigation with a requisite degree of skepticism or, at the very least, extreme caution.