Who Wants to Be An Admin

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

The Rules dont say you can't deny Christ or disagree with Apostolic doctrine. It says if you want to argue doctrine, do it in the debate room

So the whole forum is the debate room now? It used to be the UPCI was ridiculed. Now we have members ridiculing Christians and the Bible - not in the debate room.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

So the whole forum is the debate room now?

No

It used to be the UPCI was ridiculed. Now we have members ridiculing Christians and the Bible - not in the debate room.

Join the admin team.

[jfrog]

PO would be a good candidate too.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

The Rules dont say you can't deny Christ or disagree with Apostolic doctrine. It says if you want to argue doctrine, do it in the debate room

That's why I should not be admin.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by mfblume

That's why I should not be admin.

Would you still come here if everyone just agreed with you or never responded because they just agreed?

Face it, most of your interactions are discussing things with people that don't agree with you

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Would you still come here if everyone just agreed with you or never responded because they just agreed?

Face it, most of your interactions are discussing things with people that don't agree with you

I said this a few times, but like the point I made I think you'll see something interesting about this and most forums. I came to the internet way back in the early 90's to fellowship believers. And the things I like to chat about the most are the works of the cross and enhancing that understanding to see more effective work of God done through me. So, I shared those thoughts and looked for more words from others. It seems it's not controversial, so hardly got a response except amen now and then.

Meanwhile someone asked about prophecy, and I said my bit. Wow. Controversy! Then the flurry of discussions started. I'd try to get back to the other issues, but no interest. Meanwhile I kept getting questions so I'd answer them. Just mainly answering questions. And controversy was the only thing that seemed to do anything here. Still, though, tried the cross issues, and again only a small response.

In fact my sermons are all about spiritual growth and applying the cross to our lives. All of them. By appearances here folks would think I preach nothing but prophecy.

So it became evident people usually want controversy.

Let me clarify my point. I do not want everyone to agree with me. In fact I want agreement so I can delve more into the spiritual maturity element. Someone who has an angle on the word that would help that.

But when I saw people simply say Abraham was a maniac who "thought" God wanted him to kill his son, like abortionist-killers think they're on a mission from God to kill, if that's in a debate section or not, I'd ban the dude.

Disagree with apostolic doctrine in a debate room? Fine. But trashing Bible and the God of the bible? No way. So, no, it's not agreement I demand everywhere.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by mfblume

I said this a few times, but like the point I made I think you'll see something interesting about this and most forums. I came to the internet way back in the early 90's to fellowship believers. And the things I like to chat about the most are the works of the cross and enhancing that understanding to see more effective work of God done through me. So, I shared those thoughts and looked for more words from others. It seems it's not controversial, so hardly got a response except amen now and then.

Meanwhile someone asked about prophecy, and I said my bit. Wow. Controversy! Then the flurry of discussions started. I'd try to get back to the other issues, but no interest. Meanwhile I kept getting questions so I'd answer them. Just mainly answering questions. And controversy was the only thing that seemed to do anything here. Still, though, tried the cross issues, and again only a small response.

In fact my sermons are all about spiritual growth and applying the cross to our lives. All of them. By appearances here folks would think I preach nothing but prophecy.

So it became evident people usually want controversy.

Let me clarify my point. I do not want everyone to agree with me. In fact I want agreement so I can delve more into the spiritual maturity element. Someone who has an angle on the word that would help that.

But when I saw people simply say Abraham was a maniac who "thought" God wanted him to kill his son, like abortionist-killers think they're on a mission from God to kill, if that's in a debate section or not, I'd ban the dude.

Disagree with apostolic doctrine in a debate room? Fine. But trashing Bible and the God of the bible? No way. So, no, it's not agreement I demand everywhere.

[KeptByTheWord]

Originally Posted by mfblume

I said this a few times, but like the point I made I think you'll see something interesting about this and most forums. I came to the internet way back in the early 90's to fellowship believers. And the things I like to chat about the most are the works of the cross and enhancing that understanding to see more effective work of God done through me. So, I shared those thoughts and looked for more words from others. It seems it's not controversial, so hardly got a response except amen now and then.

Meanwhile someone asked about prophecy, and I said my bit. Wow. Controversy! Then the flurry of discussions started. I'd try to get back to the other issues, but no interest. Meanwhile I kept getting questions so I'd answer them. Just mainly answering questions. And controversy was the only thing that seemed to do anything here. Still, though, tried the cross issues, and again only a small response.

In fact my sermons are all about spiritual growth and applying the cross to our lives. All of them. By appearances here folks would think I preach nothing but prophecy.

So it became evident people usually want controversy.

Let me clarify my point. I do not want everyone to agree with me. In fact I want agreement so I can delve more into the spiritual maturity element. Someone who has an angle on the word that would help that.

But when I saw people simply say Abraham was a maniac who "thought" God wanted him to kill his son, like abortionist-killers think they're on a mission from God to kill, if that's in a debate section or not, I'd ban the dude.

Disagree with apostolic doctrine in a debate room? Fine. But trashing Bible and the God of the bible? No way. So, no, it's not agreement I demand everywhere.

You made a great point about controversy. Unless there is something controversial to discuss, a thread will die quickly, no matter how encouraging or how much good teaching the post has.

I still think you would make a great admin.

[Monterrey]

Originally Posted by KeptByTheWord

You made a great point about controversy. Unless there is something controversial to discuss, a thread will die quickly, no matter how encouraging or how much good teaching the post has.

I still think you would make a great admin.

Apparently others do to!

Mike, do your civic duty!!!

C'mon, how do the Canadians do it?

[Monterrey]

15-1 last vote!

Hmmmmmmmm, wonder who the 1 dissenting vote is......


Pondering....

Pondering....

Gift of discernment kicks in!!!!

Aha!!! It's the sword wielding Mike Blume who cast the lone dissenting vote!!!!

Viola!!!!!