This forum needs a name change... - Page 26

Socialite · #**251** 02-02-2011, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldPaths

PCI people left the UPC?? When did that happen?

Did you think they literally died or were converted?

They left at different times, usually en masse.

Have you heard of, or considered reading, "Christianity Without a Cross" by Thomas Fudge?

Ferd · #**252** 02-02-2011, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socialite

And I disagree.

And if it wasn't for debate, those ideas articulated in your rule book wouldn't even be there. Thank God people disagree with your position and ignored sacred cows.

I know. and on AFF you will win this arguement. the sad thing is we arent even debating the same thing.

OldPathsII · #**253** 02-02-2011, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socialite

Calling thousands of brothers who identify themselves as "PCI" as "dead" isn't mocking? So, if I said --- "The UPCI is as dead as it's doctrine. Their churches are full of dead men's bones. Why do you people glorify them as great people? They are false prophets!" That'd be okay? All within bounds? Just want your permission!

If you want to say those things go ahead and say them. But say them somewhere else. Go start your own forum and called it anti-apostolicforum.com or something. But take your bitterness against the truth of the gospel of Acts 2:38 somewhere else.

Admin · #**254** 02-02-2011, 01:18 PM

Please discuss differences without insulting the intelligence or integrity of others. There are no members here who are superior to others in any way. Those who are practicing Christianity will not infer that or even privately believe that.

Socialite · #**255** 02-02-2011, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferd

I know. and on AFF you will win this arguement. the sad thing is we arent even debating the same thing.

Hopefully, everywhere this will resound.

The moment we make things off-limits, the moment we perish.

rgcraig · #**256** 02-02-2011, 01:19 PM

Wow - - this thread even brough OldPaths out.

scotty · #**257** 02-02-2011, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socialite

And I disagree.

And if it wasn't for debate, those ideas articulated in your rule book wouldn't even be there. Thank God people disagree with your position and ignored sacred cows.

So your insulting,bashing,name calling his beliefs ?? Isnt there a forum rule on that ??

Encryptus · #**258** 02-02-2011, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferd

For the record, while I am certainly a person who believes in the Water Spirit doctrine, I do not think the official position of AFF should be "tongues are essential for salvation"

Careful people got banned from AMF for saying that.

Socialite · #**259** 02-02-2011, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldPaths

If you want to say those things go ahead and say them. But say them somewhere else. Go start your own forum and called it anti-apostolicforum.com or something. But take your bitterness against the truth of the gospel of Acts 2:38 somewhere else.

No, I choose to say them here and everywhere.

Apostolic is a biblical word. Not one made up in Hazelwood. You can't have it. It's been trademarked by an Body bigger than you and your organization with its manifestos and creeds -- The Church.

Bitterness? I was waiting to see how long that would take. I'm quite happy, thank you. And please embrace the Whole Gospel, and Whole Word, and quit pretending Acts 2:38 is the Gospel and the entire witness on the subject of what NT believers did.

*AQuietPlace* · #**260** 02-02-2011, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Wow - - this thread even brough OldPaths out.

I think it's a new Old Paths?