Anyway, you do make a good point, of course. Hyperliteralism is the heart of the problem:
this "problem" (my question about a conflict of interest, I mean, which was at least
partly TIC) as well as many, many others. I hope nobody ever cuts off a hand or plucks out an eye, as recommended in Matthew and Mark, or literally forsakes father, mother, etc., to gain literal eternal life (
Matthew 19:29).
But, of course, there probably
are some who read those very scriptures and figured they really meant what they said. And who can blame them? Let me ask you this: is what Jesus said in those hand-severing, eye-plucking scripture actually, literally
true? I mean, suppose the choice really was set before you: either pluck out your eye or end up in hell. What would you choose?
And maybe, in your theology, it isn't all that far fetched. Maybe you have a problem with pornography. Pluck out
both of your eyes, and voila! Temptation's gone!
Disclaimer: if you
do have a problem with pornography, do
not take Jesus' advice! This is a
bad time to try to prove that hyperliteralism has an "up side"!
Now, the
big question is
this:
How literal is too literal?
And this big, bold (literally!
) question has to be answered individually for evertthing in the Bible. No wonder there are people who devote their entire lives to answering such questions. (Since so many people actually think it is of utmost importance to get answers!)