Quote:
Originally Posted by PaPaDon
Mike,
Is it even remotely possible that you would concede that maybe, just MAYBE, your views about the "timing" of the fulfillment of our Lord's words concerning "end-time peophecies" might be amiss? Even the slightest chance? If so, then we might have some ground for discussion, but in the absence of such an admittance, I see no value in allowing myself to become involved in a discussion with you about this matter.
|
I used to be futurist, and studied this out most with indepth scrutiny until I knew for sure in my own estimation what I should believe, in all fear of God for my soul, and CHANGED beliefs. I have proved I am open for change when I feel corrected.
Should you be convinced I am wrong, then I will not discuss with you, anyway. I am not really interested in discussing this issue with anyone IN THIS THREAD except to show the differences between full and partial preterism, anyway,
which is the reason for the thread.
If YOU might concede your timing could be off, then and then only would I likewise discuss the issuie with you as well. But that should be in a different topic thread, and not this one, since this one is for a singular purpose of comparing full and partial preterism alone.
I am ALWAYS open for correction. I just feel you are not.
Thanks, and let me know. So far you have only criticized me by saying you see no value in speaking to me thus far. So far you have not engaged me in any detailed scriupural discussion. I laid forth distinct points as to how
Matthew 24 must be fulfilled since the 1st century and you have not responded point by point to prove anything right or wrong, for example. You simply glossed over it all and made a broad sweep with your opinion alone. I cannot take your word for it, alone, that you studied it. I need to see your detailed explanation of scriptures and where I err in your estimation. If you wish to discuss this issue in scriptural detail, then please do so at the thread about my beliefs, but not here.
Linear Mode
