Supreme Court Upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban!

[CC1]

For those of you who don't think politics matter and that it doesn't matter who is President and from which party please take note;

Today in a 5-4 vote the Supreme Court upheld the Administration supported ban on partial birth abortion!!!!!!

They are the final say and now it is final that a significant number of children will no longer be murdered in this horrendous way.

Is it a total victory against the murder that is abortion? No, of course not. But it is going to save a signifcant number of lives and would not have happened if a liberal (read that DEMOCRAT) had been elected President and appointed the last few Supreme Court Justices.

[ChTatum]

Thanks for posting this!

Originally Posted by CC1

For those of you who don't think politics matter and that it doesn't matter who is President and from which party please take note;

Today in a 5-4 vote the Supreme Court upheld the Administration supported ban on partial birth abortion!!!!!!

They are the final say and now it is final that a significant number of children will no longer be murdered in this horrendous way.

Is it a total victory against the murder that is abortion? No, of course not. But it is going to save a signifcant number of lives and would not have happened if a liberal (read that DEMOCRAT) had been elected President and appointed the last few Supreme Court Justices.

I wouldn't get so excited about this. The Court can overturn its own decisions.

Are there really a significant number of children being aborted in the third trimester? (Not that even one child being aborted is insignificant).

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by CC1

For those of you who don't think politics matter and that it doesn't matter who is President and from which party please take note;

Today in a 5-4 vote the Supreme Court upheld the Administration supported ban on partial birth abortion!!!!!!

They are the final say and now it is final that a significant number of children will no longer be murdered in this horrendous way.

Is it a total victory against the murder that is abortion? No, of course not. But it is going to save a signifcant number of lives and would not have happened if a liberal (read that DEMOCRAT) had been elected President and appointed the last few Supreme Court Justices.

The Democrats support the welfare state and, IMO, is why they support abortion. It saves them money in the long haul.

[Nina]

Originally Posted by Chan

I wouldn't get so excited about this. The Court can overturn its own decisions.

Are there really a significant number of children being aborted in the third trimester? (Not that even one child being aborted is insignificant).

Bro,
To the best of my knowledge,
Kansas is the only state that requires separate reporting for partial birth abortions. In 1999, 182 of them were reported. They were all done for "mental reasons".

Nina

[RevDWW]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

The Democrats support the welfare state and, IMO, is why they support abortion. It saves them money in the long haul.

Why kill off the next generation that will be dependant on you and impower you because of that dependence?

I think for the most part they just have no standard of decency!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by RevDWW

Why kill off the next generation that will be dependant on you and impower you because of that dependence?

I think for the most part they just have no standard of decency!

You have a good point. I agree that they have no standard of decency, but they must have some thoughts on the welfare state in mind when taking that stand.

I think they are trying to support the welfare state, but keep the spending at a minimum or at least down to some degree. It makes them look like they are doing a good thing. If it got out of control by supporting so many, people would really be able to tell that it isnt' working for America.

I don't think they want that. JMO.

[RevDWW]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

You have a good point. I agree that they have no standard of decency, but they must have some thoughts on the welfare state in mind when taking that stand.

I think they are trying to support the welfare state, but keep the spending at a minimum or at least down to some degree. It makes them look like they are doing a good thing. If it got out of control by supporting so many, people would really be able to tell that it isnt' working for America.

I don't think they want that. JMO.

Could be like Pharaoh's order to "kill the boy babies off at birth so they don't grow so big in number as to overthrow us". [Weaver Paraphrase]

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by RevDWW

Could be like Pharaoh's order to "kill the boy babies off at birth so they don't grow so big in number as to overthrow us". [Weaver Paraphrase]

Maybe so!

[Ferd]

Originally Posted by Chan

I wouldn't get so excited about this. The Court can overturn its own decisions.

Are there really a significant number of children being aborted in the third trimester? (Not that even one child being aborted is insignificant).

Didn’t I read where you claimed that the tragedy of Virginia Tech was no worse than any other typical murder? Does it matter if one baby is killed or ten thousand?

Aren’t you arguing both sides of an argument here?