Fruitcake with that Tea Party ?

[Sam]

Originally Posted by Light

I've noticed when people harp about a sin (or sinner in this case) they usually have the same problem!!!!! You sure harp a lot about Barney?????

I've made 14,700 and some posts here on AFF.
I do not know how many of them have mentioned Barney.
I'm sure it's a very small percentage.
Perhaps someone can investigate and see how many times I've mentioned Barney and publish those figures. I'm not sure what kind of figure would be considered "harping."

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Sam

I've made 14,700 and some posts here on AFF.
I do not know how many of them have mentioned Barney.
I'm sure it's a very small percentage.
Perhaps someone can investigate and see how many times I've mentioned Barney and publish those figures. I'm not sure what kind of figure would be considered "harping."

I don't view your posts as Light does, but you've mentioned Barney Fwank quite a lot.

[Light]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I don't view your posts as Light does, but you've mentioned Barney Fwank quite a lot.

Hey all is fair in love and war! I hope Sam knows I'm kidding

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Seascapes

I know what the Tea Party stands for, and it is not for the working middle class. But you are right, they are fruity, nutty, and anything else along those lines. Most of the time they are unlearned about our country's history, and then they get up let people know that they are NOT smarter than a first grader.

Here is your chance to provide facts to support the previous 3 accusations....Im not expecting anything

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Seascapes

I know what the Tea Party stands for, and it is not for the working middle class. But you are right, they are fruity, nutty, and anything else along those lines. Most of the time they are unlearned about our country's history, and then they get up let people know that they are NOT smarter than a first grader.

You seem to have missed the study of history. If you had a clue about history, you would have been able to grasp the significance of naming the tea party as it was named.

Marxists as yourself do not grasp the concept of confiscatory taxation.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Light

I've noticed when people harp about a sin (or sinner in this case) they usually have the same problem!!!!! You sure harp a lot about Barney?????

Thanks bud light.

Originally Posted by Light

I can not think of one time you posted something like this. AFF has the reputation of posting e mail with out checking the source. All most all were lies.

Originally Posted by Light

You have the nerve to talk about lying? I thought lie was your middle name!!!

Originally Posted by Light

Question: How do you know when coade is lying?
Answer: When he posts!

Originally Posted by Light

Here the uninformed go again! The e mail is a lie! You should be ashamed of your self.

So light harps about me and lying. I luv Democrats.

[Cindy]

I think some of y'all act like politicians on AFF.

[Light]

Originally Posted by coadie

Thanks bud light.

So light harps about me and lying. I luv Democrats.

So you admit you lie. About time you tell the truth!!!

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Light

So you admit you lie. About time you tell the truth!!!

Misquoting me is an example of dishonesty.

If you want to be honest, just cut and paste what people say or put quote marks on what they say. The dishonest way is to distort what people posted.

So light harps about me and lying.

Your pastor may suggest you not bear false witness.

[Walks_in_islam]

Yes its way better to enjoy all the good stuff benefits of America now and confiscate the price for it from your kids or grandkids.

The conservative way "UH you loan me some money?" LOL

National debt increase relative to GDP

Ronald Reagan R 1981–1984 +11.3%
Reagan2 Ronald Reagan R 1985–1989 +9.3%
Bush GHW George H. W. Bush R 1989–1993 +15.0%
Clinton1 Bill Clinton D -0.7%
Clinton2 Bill Clinton D -9.0%
Bush GW1 George W. Bush R +7.1%
Bush GW2 George W. Bush R +20.0%

Do you have an explanation for this or some logic that can twist this into a good thing? Do you understand that this has to be paid someday and that the only ways to pay it is to collect money for it or print money for it?

Do you get the concept that the debt increase during the Reagan years funded the problems for the debt increase in the Bush years?

Originally Posted by coadie

You seem to have missed the study of history. If you had a clue about history, you would have been able to grasp the significance of naming the tea party as it was named.

Marxists as yourself do not grasp the concept of confiscatory taxation.