Spiritual Co-dendency in the churches? - Page 6

COOPER · #1 03-10-2007, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

See, this is probably why you will get nowhere. You constantly turn every discussion into a lopsides attack of the UPC. That's a logical fallacy of a sweeping generalization and I think you know that. That's part of the problem I have with you personally....because you keep doing it. It's not "the UPC attitude"...you can find any attitude in any organization and that does not make it owned by that organization nor does it make it the norm for all.

I agree, Coon is UPC and I was.
I know no other group.
So UPC is what I talk about, so what?

Praxeas · #2 03-10-2007, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by COOPER

I agree, Coon is UPC and I was.
I know no other group.
So UPC is what I talk about, so what?

So what? You know so what. You know exactly what I mean. You are being intellectually dishonest when you willingly, knowingly perpetuate that same LOGICAL fallacy. You know it's wrong to make such a judgement on the WHOLE UPC when you know it is NOT true of the entire UPC and quite frankly it get's nauseating to see you do it over and over

Whole Hearted · #3 03-10-2007, 08:36 PM

Just more preacher haters. No body gonna tell me what to do.

The Mrs · #4 03-10-2007, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whole Hearted

Just more preacher haters. No body gonna tell me what to do.

If you're going to make this statement...you're going to HAVE to look at the REASON why he got that way, aren't you?

berkeley · #5 03-10-2007, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mrs

If you're going to make this statement...you're going to HAVE to look at the REASON why he got that way, aren't you?

Don't feed the catfish..

Whole Hearted · #6 03-10-2007, 09:10 PM

It's called rebellion. No body gonna tell me what to do. started in the garden.

Nahum · #7 03-10-2007, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whole Hearted

It's called rebellion. No body gonna tell me what to do. started in the garden.

Ernnnt - WRONG!!!!!!!

That wasn't the problem. The problem was that they wanted to be like God.
They were deceived by their own lusts for divinity.

Get it right preacha!

Yet another perfect example of twisting scripture to fit your agenda.

rrford · #8 03-10-2007, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Ernnnt - WRONG!!!!!!!

That wasn't the problem. The problem was that they wanted to be like God.
They were deceived by their own lusts for divinity.

Get it right preacha!

Yet another perfect example of twisting scripture to fit your agenda.

Hmmm, seems to me it wasn't exactly to "be like divinity" either.

Nahum · #9 03-10-2007, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rrford

Hmmm, seems to me it wasn't exactly to "be like divinity" either.

Go back and read the basis of the serpents temptation.

4 "You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. 5 "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."

6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.

rrford · #10 03-10-2007, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Go back and read the basis of the serpents temptation.

4 "You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. 5 "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."

6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.

Indeed it was the basis. But her eating was clearly for 2 other reasons: 1) Good for food; 2) Make one wise. Nowhere does it say she actually responded to the temptation to be like God." JMO.