Quote:
Originally Posted by JTULLOCK
Did you even read his whole blog about the Trinity? If so then you would have seen where he talks about the word 'persona' translated in english to persons not being the proper way to describe God. You and TR try to get all tricky and the reason is that if you saw it then you would realize you have been explaining wrong for a long time. JMHO
|
Tricky?
Are you kidding me here?
The guy Dan Scott has a solid Oneness background. He knows the essentials of Oneness doctrine in and out. He also knows the essentials of Trinity doctrine.
He writes an article that says a lot but ends up saying nothing. The article is entitled "Thoughts on Trinity", so he could easily have taken a position of "Trinity is incorrect, Oneness is correct", or "Oneness incorrect, Trinity doctrine is correct". Or if he believes in a hybrid doctrine mixing the two, he could say that two. Obvioulsy he is an educated man, who is able to express his thoughts clearly if he wants to...
But after reading his article, you yourself see that
some people end up thinking he has a Oneness slant to the article, while others think he has a Trinitarian slant. So at the end of the day, one is left not even sure
what he believes... but
you accuse Epley and I of being "tricky"?
Please JT... stop it. Stop the madness.
Are you so blinded by your love for, and allegiance to, this man that you can't see things clearly any more? If so, that would be sad.
Threaded Mode
