Quote:
Originally Posted by rrford
You guys are hilarious.
Holocaust, massacre, cult, etc. Comparing the UPCI to Hitler's Germany, Jones' Guyana, and traitorous acts. And you think the UPC should be ashamed? That is quite laughable.
Even funnier, "It iwas the cons agenda to sanitize and they got their way with this Resolution!" seems to be the cry. Yet, it seems some of you have forgotten that it was at this very same GC that the "cons" lost the vote on the TV resolution. Now who is really confused? It appears you guys like to make the "facts" fit your argument. Talk about hyperbole. 
For those who want to know "How do we know who is under question?" Believe it or not that procedure was already in the Manual before this Resolution ever passed. |
Yes it was an addendum ... however it gave teeth to it .... by making it a board decision ... as evident now that boards are getting together to blacklist.
RR who wrote resolution 3???
In all of forumland there has to be one insider that knows the answer and can share this ...
Do you think they'd answer this question if I picked up the phone and called headquarters?
Rather than address these actions by this board will the org sycophants simply laugh off the severity of this type of ex post facto vigilantism (more hyperbole)
It's figurative language RR ... it's used in our everyday speech ... some like PP use it more than others. As long as we can separate fact from fiction I think we can still engage in honest discussion using these type of idiomatic expressions. What say ye?
Threaded Mode
