Just because you call it rhetoric, don't make it false.
One Name... Coward... I don't view it as a name perse, but the definition of the word.
"a person who shows fear or timidity"
I think the "name" or word is fitting in this setting...
I understand on some level for certain things the anonymous aspect, but more harm than good has flowed from the free wheel nature and destructive bent to tear down some have excercised
words should have consequences.
if you are bold enough to say it, you should be bold enough to take the consequences of the same
I believe in bold communication... however I think it is less than bold if you don't feel strong enough to stand behind it.
but that is just me
My name is scott phillips and I approve this message
Just because you call it rhetoric, don't make it false.
One Name... Coward... I don't view it as a name perse, but the definition of the word.
"a person who shows fear or timidity"
I think the "name" or word is fitting in this setting...
I understand on some level for certain things the anonymous aspect, but more harm than good has flowed from the free wheel nature and destructive bent to tear down some have excercised
words should have consequences.
if you are bold enough to say it, you should be bold enough to take the consequences of the same
I believe in bold communication... however I think it is less than bold if you don't feel strong enough to stand behind it.
but that is just me
My name is scott phillips and I approve this message
Just because you call it rhetoric, don't make it false.
One Name... Coward... I don't view it as a name perse, but the definition of the word.
"a person who shows fear or timidity"
I think the "name" or word is fitting in this setting...
I understand on some level for certain things the anonymous aspect, but more harm than good has flowed from the free wheel nature and destructive bent to tear down some have excercised
words should have consequences.
if you are bold enough to say it, you should be bold enough to take the consequences of the same
I believe in bold communication... however I think it is less than bold if you don't feel strong enough to stand behind it.
but that is just me
My name is scott phillips and I approve this message
Pastor Philips, since you were one seeming to condemn the meetings can you share with us publicly what you believe was discussed in Detroit?
__________________
In essentials, unity. In non-essentials, liberty. In all things, charity. Augustine
Thier is a lot of "negativity" on the forum (at least towards the UPC or anyone who is not liberal) & I just posted that it was a message that had a lot of substance to it.
If people who listened only heard "meetings" they missed the gist of the message IMHO.
I've tried to only question and discuss issues. It's not an attempt to be negative. Some are acidic in their approach, but surely you don't see us all that way.
I hope that some of those who have condemned the meeting and supported the message brought last night at the MS camp, will back up their reasoning on the wrongness of the meeting by giving us details of what was discussed at the "evil, cunning, conniving" meeting.
__________________
In essentials, unity. In non-essentials, liberty. In all things, charity. Augustine
I've tried to only question and discuss issues. It's not an attempt to be negative. Some are acidic in their approach, but surely you don't see us all that way.
No I don't, but then again while I have seen your opinions at times I don't believe I have ever seen you make any accusations either.
Linear Mode
