Mooney Guns for "Secret" Meeting in Detroit? - Page 40

EA · #**391** 07-09-2009, 03:53 PM

For the record, Ron has 61 of the 390 posts on this thread.

Praxeas · #**392** 07-09-2009, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhoni

Now that is a thought!!!!!

ACCOUNTABILITY

I take issue with so many that hide behind anonymity in order to say things they would not say publically against the policies and procedures that they espouse or sign their name to every time it comes due to renew their license or teach in their Bible Colleges, or hold positions in bordering countries, ect.

Just my thoughts on the matter: Rhonda R. Cyprus

Hey Rhoni...how many threads and posts have you made that you wanted deleted because you realized people KNEW who you were?

The truth is there are somethings that need to be said but because of the cabals out there if you did you could get in trouble.

They would not say them publically Rhoni, not because they don't need to be said but because if they did it would cause trouble for them or even their FAMILY

staysharp · #**393** 07-09-2009, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kim Komando

Here is a link to this being said in Terry Black's church just a few weeks ago.
http://tpcmemphis.org/wmcast.aspx?ba...gh&wme=062609d

Along with his newfound "Angel Deja Vu" teaching he seems to be teaching that angels administer healings during service also.

None of his assertions, as is customary with Lee, is supported by scripture but rather sensational anecdotes and testimonies.

He also he boasted of a private camping trip he had with Haney and a Haney relative. In the story, he relates that it was a time of spiritual retreat and prayer where they were visited by an angelic visitation perceived by Lee.

Stoneking, along with his Holy Magic Hair doctrine, has for years delved in what many of his peers deem, mistakenly or not, as angel worship.

Yes, he is a sensationalist without any biblical foundation. I know he is sincere, however sincerely wrong. He also said..."God's eyes will lead us and you know where His eye is now? His eye is on holiness and a demonstration of His spirit." Of course, the crowd loved this and all started jumping up and down...

That statement is un-biblical. My bible says..."His eye is on the Righteous and His ear is open unto their cry..."

rgcraig · #**394** 07-09-2009, 03:55 PM

Ron,

Saying, I don't believe you IS NOT calling someone a liar.

It's a discussion.

Poster 1: The sky is blue

Poster 2: I don't believe you

Poster 1: Why do you not believe me? Just look up and notice the clouds are white and the rest of the sky if blue.

Poster 2: It doesn't look like blue to me.

Poster 1: Well, I believe if you do some reading you will discover that it's confirmed that the sky is blue.

Poster 2: If you say so - - I've always called it teal.

Stupid, but hopefully, you'll start getting a idea of why moniker didn't call PB a liar.

Ron · #**395** 07-09-2009, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Ron. I prefer to not let the gossipmongers and the hatemongers not know my personal information...care to tell me why you need my personal information?

Making an accusation has nothing to do with whether someone is anonymous or not Ron. Please show me where in the rules or in the bible the topic of accusation is OK when not done anonymously.

IF and I stress IF someone makes an accusation without being anonymous and they whine about someone that makes an accusation while being anonymous, merely because that person is anonymous, then that person in my opinion is being hypocritical by saying "It's ok to make an accusation against someone as long as you tell them who you are"....

That's as bad as someone making an accusation against someone then calling out others for making accusations. That is hypocrisy.

What is going on is not gossip. The source of the message is available to everyone.

Someone stating their opinion that they believe the motive of someone else was different than what they said is no less an accusation than YOUR constant accusations here. That you do it under the name "Ron" is irrelevant. Your accusations don't magically become "ok" just because your real name is Ron.

So true & I agree 100%!

What a real name gives one is "Accountability!"

National enquirer uses "unnamed sources" & we know what they churn out.
Covers for the bottom of bird cages!

Baron1710 · #**396** 07-09-2009, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

Prax hiding behind anonymity to make accusations is akin to gossip, & innuendo which the Bible has something to say about.
If one can't see that, then I am afraid they are more lost than they realize!

Truth does not need a disguise!

This was aimed at Prax but I want to throw in my two cents. I don't care who wants to know who I am. I will gladly reveal my identity, however I don't necessarily want my clients putting my name in google and reading what I have to say on here. I carefully guard my political and religious views from those who come into my office and it makes no sense to put my name on these posts.

Has anyone ever read the Federalist Papers? Cowards one and all.

mizpeh · #**397** 07-09-2009, 03:58 PM

We are all accountable to God whether we use our real name or not. He knows.

GrowingPains · #**398** 07-09-2009, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

I have spoken up about the Detroit meeting as hearing from one who was there & said that there was nothing to worry about said meeting.
Having no reason to doubt this person or his word, I believe him.

However, I did not hear that from PM meeting & methinks people are a little on the paranoid about things than they should be.

They totally missed the message!

How many commenting on Mooney's alleged words have actually listened to the sermon in its entirety?

Praxeas · #**399** 07-09-2009, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhoni

I think Ron should stay - He is indeed an honest man and stands up for what he believes and does it under his own name

wow. Did Rhoni just accuse everyone that does not use their real name of being liars? Hmmmmm Ron? You got something to say about Rhoni accusing everyone of being liars? No?

And the drivel goes on and on and on. See how it works? You can accuse anyone....but how dare someone else accuse someone right? That is called Hypocrisy Ron. You accusing people does not become ok because you are Ron. Someone else accusing does not become wrong because they don't use their real names.

Some people value their privacy more than others. Some people have things they like to see changed or addressed that they don't want to be persecuted over.

Praxeas · #**400** 07-09-2009, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizpeh

We are all accountable to God whether we use our real name or not. He knows.

exactly