Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:19 AM
NLYP's Avatar
NLYP NLYP is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
AS Questions Answered!

I got my answers to the questions posed in my thread about the AS and the signing of it and how and where it binds.

I was on the telephone with a dear man that I and many others respect highly. You could consider him a District Official of sorts from Texas.

So here you go....from a man that knows, reads, studies and defines the manual as written.

First the AS

The affirmation statement in itself says that "I (Ministers Name) do hereby declare that I believe and embrace fundamental doctrine as stated in the Articles of Faith as set forth by the United Pentecostal Church Int. I ALSO BELIEVE AND EMBRACE THE HOLINESS STANDARDS of the United Pentecostal Church Int. in said Articles of Faith,
And I PLEDGE to practice, teach and preach the same"

The fundamental Doctrine part.....No question....

Its the second half that I am questioning...

I ALSO BELIEVE AND EMBRACE THE HOLINESS STANDARDS of the United Pentecostal Church Int. in said Articles of Faith,
And I PLEDGE to practice, teach and preach the same"

So here they are again.....Quoted from the manual...

"HOLINESS
Godly living should characterize the life of every child of the Lord, and we should live according to the pattern and example given in the Word of God. "For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and Godly, in this present world" (Titus 2:11,12). "For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow His steps: who did no sin, neither was 'guile found in His mouth: who, when He was reviled, reviled not again; when He suffered, He threatened not; but committed himself to Him that judgeth righteously" (1 Peter 2:21-23).

"Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord" (Heb. 12:14).

"But as He which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation; because it is written, be ye holy; for I am holy. And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear: forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot" (1 Peter 1:15-19).

We wholeheartedly disapprove of our people indulging in any activities which are not conducive to good Christianity and Godly living, such as theaters, dances, mixed bathing, women cutting their hair, make-up, any apparel that immodestly exposes the body, all worldly sports and amusements, and unwholesome radio programs and music. Furthermore, because of the display of all these evils on television, we disapprove of any of our people having television sets in their homes. We admonish all of our people to refrain from any of these practices in the interest of spiritual progress and the soon coming of the Lord for His church."

His words to me were quite shocking to say the least...

Here is the kicker in the wording...
We wholeheartedly disapprove!

He said that is NOT a we forbid.......It was put there because of the need for tolerance for different interpretation. He stated that the office of the GS - Bro. Jerry Jones would indeed verify this.

ALSO.....notice please that womens pants are NOT addressed in the manual!!!

hmmmmm This, I admit was a huge red flag for me.

I was told "TECHNICALLY" If a minsters wife wore pants or a tv program is started and the praise team women are in pants....the District can do NOTHING about it...since it is NOT adressed in the manual.

They put this HUGE emphasis on TV!

YET in matters of what we call HOLINESS - We get a wholeheartedly Disapprove.

So now you have it...
Which WITH THE ACEPTION OF THE ACTS 2:38 Fundamental Doctrine....

EVERYTHING ELSE IS UP TO PRIVATE INTERPRETATION!

Read it again...

We wholeheartedly disapprove of our people indulging in any activities which are not conducive to good Christianity and Godly living, such as theaters, dances, mixed bathing, women cutting their hair, make-up, any apparel that immodestly exposes the body, all worldly sports and amusements, and unwholesome radio programs and music. Furthermore, because of the display of all these evils on television, we disapprove of any of our people having television sets in their homes. We admonish all of our people to refrain from any of these practices in the interest of spiritual progress and the soon coming of the Lord for His church."

These are NOT shall nots....

So...I guess the AS IS ok in my opinion now since I do agree we have to be united on acts 2.
So those of you that would leave for not signing the AS over standards....COME ON HOME!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:21 AM
BoredOutOfMyMind's Avatar
BoredOutOfMyMind BoredOutOfMyMind is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
Why is this a new thread?

Same thoughts you had in the other one and you failed to justify a man having a TV when he said he would not.
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:24 AM
NLYP's Avatar
NLYP NLYP is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind View Post
Why is this a new thread?

Same thoughts you had in the other one and you failed to justify a man having a TV when he said he would not.
Because the other thread had served its purpose and this one will answer the question.

I never set out to justify the tv as you say...BOOMMEISTER....

I agree...if you sing it you are lying if you have a tv...hence the reason I got rid of mine in may and have not had one.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:25 AM
BoredOutOfMyMind's Avatar
BoredOutOfMyMind BoredOutOfMyMind is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLYP View Post
Because the other thread had served its purpose and this one will answer the question.

I never set out to justify the tv as you say...BOOMMEISTER....

I agree...if you sing it you are lying if you have a tv...hence the reason I got rid of mine in may and have not had one.
The other thread is still active.

__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:27 AM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
NYLP,

So the Christ Church female praise singers in slacks or pantsuits could be UPC!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:29 AM
NLYP's Avatar
NLYP NLYP is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
NYLP,

So the Christ Church female praise singers in slacks or pantsuits could be UPC!!!!
Think about it CC....
There is NOTHING forbidding pants in the Holiness position of the UPC.

SO....If they are acts 2...I guess so.

Im kinda floored over this....Ive never thought about it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:50 AM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
The pants on women loophole has been discussed before on here. It is interesting that with so many other things specifically listed in a laundry list that pants on women is not there.

Especially given that at the time this was written culturally pants were considered primarily men's clothing, which has not been true the last 30 years.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:55 AM
Coonskinner Coonskinner is offline
Non-Resident Redneck


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,523
At the time it was written, I doubt if anyone thought it was necessary to specify.

It was considered a given.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:55 AM
rgcraig's Avatar
rgcraig rgcraig is offline
My Family!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 31,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLYP View Post
Think about it CC....
There is NOTHING forbidding pants in the Holiness position of the UPC.

SO....If they are acts 2...I guess so.

Im kinda floored over this....Ive never thought about it.
Really? Well, study up boy!
__________________
Master of Science in Applied Disgruntled Religious Theorist Wrangling
PhD in Petulant Tantrum Quelling
Dean of the School of Hard Knocks
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-04-2007, 09:58 AM
NLYP's Avatar
NLYP NLYP is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgcraig View Post
Really? Well, study up boy!
YOU study up woman!!!!!!LOL

Read the manual...ITS NOT THERE!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
age old questions Arphaxad Deep Waters 11 09-26-2007 01:55 AM
A Prayer Just Answered Sister Alvear Fellowship Hall 7 08-16-2007 11:25 PM
Answered prayer: A Dilemma? Eliseus Fellowship Hall 12 03-19-2007 12:12 AM
Prayer Request- ANSWERED!!! Falla39 Prayer Closet 55 02-20-2007 11:30 PM
Prayers seem to have been answered... Ronzo Prayer Closet 6 02-16-2007 11:23 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.