Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2007, 11:20 AM
chaotic_resolve chaotic_resolve is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,243
The Meltdown

Friday, September 28, 2007 - a day that, for conservatives, will live in infamy.

On this day, the line of demarcation was removed.

On this day, the gates were opened to sin and debauchery.

On this day, the United Pentecostal Church International became as any other charismatic organization.

On this day, the organization was sent in motion down a slippery slope.

On this day, standards of holiness and righteousness were unceremoniously dropped by liberals and moderates who love the creature more than the Creator.

On this day, the UPCI put on paint, cut her long hair, put on sinful rags and became as a prostitute.

This day, according to one conservative, is likened to Tuesday, September 11, 2001 when terrorists flew planes into the World Trade Center and the United States was thrust into a long, difficult and costly war.

Because of this day, ten years from now the United Pentecostal Church will be a godless organization, immersed in sin, scandals and having no sign of holiness.

Because of this day, ten years from now the United Pentecostal Church will no longer believe the necessity of the plan of salvation as we now know it: Repentance, water baptism in Jesus Name and the infilling of the Holy Ghost.

All because of this day: Friday, September 28, 2007.

All because 1,065 ministers voted "Yes" on Resolution 4.

UPCI

While this is largely TIC, many of the above are factual statements made by conservatives who are upset with the results of the vote.

I wonder what would have happened would the vote have gone the other way. And what if the moderates and liberals were the ones talking about leaving the organization, as what happened after the abominable AS.

I doubt there would have been the plea from the conservative side to whether the storm and stick with the brethren. If so, it would have been very brief.

Instead the reaction would be one that any minister who left over the vote would be considered, by conservatives, to be wrong. They would be put under question and many ministers would be beaten down by the conservatives for their exit from the UPC.

So now what of the conservatives who are leaving? Why is it that when ministers left in '92 they were labeled compromisers, backsliders and other choice terms; and yet the conservatives who are leaving now are said to be men of conviction and un-reproach?

Isn't it possible there were men of conviction who left in '92? Isn't it possible that now there are conservatives leaving out of anger, and a losers walk mentality? They didn't win, so they're leaving. They lost the game so they're taking their ball and not playing anymore.

Don't mistake or misconstrue my statement here. I don't believe there are any "losers" here; and I don't consider anything done for Christ a "game." These are just analogies I've heard used.

It would be a shame for certain conservatives, indeed some from this board, to leave over this resolution. It's not honorable. Not any statement of conviction. In fact, it's a statement of weakness.

Nothing has changed.

For years, UPCI churches across the nation have disagreed and varied in standards. Like a snowflake, no two churches are alike in beliefs on outward standards. Each church is different, in some way, from other churches. Some are ridiculously conservative; others woefully liberal and the rest are somewhat moderate, though all are different.

Yet that's never stopped them from continuing in fellowship together. Yes, some refuse to fellowship with others - mostly it's conservatives refusing to fellowship with those who don't believe in the standards they believe in. (That's not a knock against conservatives, but just a fact.) But for the most part, we've all still continued in fellowship despite our differences knowing that the one thing we share is our doctrine of salvation - and that will never change.

It's sad that through all the differences, the one thing anyone chooses to leave over is a vote on allowing television ministry.

Again, nothing has changed. Just as with outward standards, conservatives can choose to continue on without any change. It's not as though anyone is being forced to do something they don't want to do.

It blows my mind the statements I'm hearing from conservatives . . . almost as though they're hoping the UPC crashes and burns because of this vote. They want so desperately to be right that they're hoping and praying their warnings of doom and gloom are proven true.

While on AFF they present a façade . . . in private and amongst others, conservatives are in a meltdown . . .

All because of one day, September 28, 2007, and one vote, Resolution 4.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2007, 11:29 AM
Nahum Nahum is offline
Registered User


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
yep
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2007, 11:29 AM
Thad's Avatar
Thad Thad is offline
Invisible Thad


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,966
My one question that continues to go unanswered is this:

what will we do when TVs are no more ?? when the kids of America ask " mommy, what's a TV " ????
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2007, 11:30 AM
StillStanding's Avatar
StillStanding StillStanding is offline
Beautiful are the feet......


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
I will say this: September 28, 2007 marks the day the conservatives lost power to the moderates in the UPCI.

I believe more changes are now on the horizon as the UPCI begins the process of becoming more inclusive. The UPCI is a big ship, and turning a big ship is a very slow process!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2007, 12:11 PM
James Griffin's Avatar
James Griffin James Griffin is offline
ultra con (at least here)


 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 1,962
The group seeking to leave is the same group that would vote to exclude if they were the majority, so where is the love, tolerance, meekness, gentleness, longsuffering, and just plain ole agape centered?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2007, 12:20 PM
deltaguitar's Avatar
deltaguitar deltaguitar is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Flower Mound, Tx
Posts: 2,791
I agree. The conservatives are right.

Once the message that the UPC preaches is thrown into the limelight the inconsistancies that have plegued this organization will have to be dealt with. The "message" will have to become more acceptable to average Americans and be less offensive to other Christians.

However, the world is hungry for what we Apostolics have and getting this message out could lead to something good.

I view this "slippery slope" as possibly a good thing for the UPC. We might not realize it now but we might just need to lighten up in order to reach our world.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2007, 12:23 PM
Nahum Nahum is offline
Registered User


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
Some things need to be brought into the light of scrutiny.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2007, 12:25 PM
mizpeh mizpeh is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by deltaguitar View Post
I agree. The conservatives are right.

Once the message that the UPC preaches is thrown into the limelight the inconsistancies that have plegued this organization will have to be dealt with. The "message" will have to become more acceptable to average Americans and be less offensive to other Christians.

However, the world is hungry for what we Apostolics have and getting this message out could lead to something good.

I view this "slippery slope" as possibly a good thing for the UPC. We might not realize it now but we might just need to lighten up in order to reach our world.

How do you make this message of the gospel more acceptable and less offensive. IT IS WHAT IT IS!
__________________
His banner over me is LOVE.... My soul followeth hard after thee....Love one another with a pure heart fervently. Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?

To be a servant of God, it will cost us our total commitment to God, and God alone. His burden must be our burden... Sis Alvear
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2007, 12:52 PM
redeemedcynic84
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizpeh View Post
How do you make this message of the gospel more acceptable and less offensive. IT IS WHAT IT IS!
because it isn't the gospel that they'll find offensive, its the extra trimmings we have added to it....

Its one thing to be hated for His name sake... its another entirely to be hated because you don't make any sense in what you make stands for/against...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-29-2007, 02:10 PM
JamDat JamDat is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad View Post
My one question that continues to go unanswered is this:

what will we do when TVs are no more ?? when the kids of America ask " mommy, what's a TV " ????
I guess we'll be united again.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.