Did Jesus Wear Pants?

[Costeon]

Did Jesus and other Jewish men wear a garment that visibly distinguished their clothes from the women of their culture?

[JoeBandy]

Originally Posted by Costeon

Did Jesus and other Jewish men wear a garment that visibly distinguished their clothes from the women of their culture?

no!!!!! At least not in the context of your question.....

[BuckeyeBukaroo]

Originally Posted by JoeBandy

no!!!!! At least not in the context of your question.....

There was a separation of some sort else the Bible would be contradictory.

[aegsm76]

Originally Posted by Costeon

Did Jesus and other Jewish men wear a garment that visibly distinguished their clothes from the women of their culture?

Yes.

The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.

[Costeon]

Thank you to those who have responded so far, but, if possible, could you provide details about their clothing in the first century AD? I know we would assume that there was some sort of difference based on Deut 22.5, but what was that difference?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Jesus wore pants

[BuckeyeBukaroo]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Jesus wore pants

Is it immodest to go fishing in the nude?

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
"The breeches were for the purpose of covering their private parts. They weren't pants, they were underwear - drawers - which need no further explanation."

It's the design of the the garment.That makes that garment or anything designed like it to pertain to a man. It doesn't matter what they were for, God designed it for a man. So in turn we don't have to wonder what garments do pertain unto a man, this one and anything made like it as the text says "from the loins even unto the thighs they shall reach." Any garment that goes down the leg that describes, short or long. In turn why do you think traditionally womens underwear were created different? Because of this very thing and the commandment of God. Despite anything we see in modern day culture, that has nothing to do with God, so we shouldn't gage our moral compass off of Babylon.

[consapente89]

Immodesty and gender distinction are two separate issues.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Costeon

Did Jesus and other Jewish men wear a garment that visibly distinguished their clothes from the women of their culture?

They were made different..
"If you’ve read the Bible, then you’ve probably come across the phrase “gird up your loins.” I’ve always thought it was a funny turn of phrase. Loins….heh.

Back in the days of the ancient Near East, both men and women wore flowing tunics. Around the tunic, they’d wear a belt or girdle. While tunics were comfortable and breezy, the hem of the tunic would often get in the way when a man was fighting or performing hard labor. So when ancient Hebrew men had to battle the Philistines, the men would lift the hem of their tunic up and tuck it into their girdle or tie it in a knot to keep it off the ground. The effect basically created a pair of shorts that provided more freedom of movement. Thus to tell someone to “gird up their loins” was to tell them to get ready for hard work or battle. It was the ancient way of saying “man up!”"

A woman's robe wasn't made to be able to do this.
Found this on Wikipedia..
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_clothing
"simlāh, kethōneth, sādhı̄n
While a woman's garments mostly corresponded to those of men: they wore simlāh and kethōneth, they also evidently differed in some ways from those of men[1][5] (see Deuteronomy 22:5). Women's garments were probably longer (compare Nahum 3:5, Jeremiah 13:22, Jeremiah 13:26, Isaiah 47:2), had sleeves (2Samuel 13:19), presumably were brighter colors and more ornamented, and also may have been of finer material.[1][5] Also worn by women was the sadin, the finer linen underdress (see Isaiah 3:23, Proverbs 22:24).[5]"

The opposite of Breeches. Why because that design pertained unto a man.