MSNBC/Shuster Retracts False Accusation of O'Keefe

[deacon blues]

Well, well, well...

It appears MSNBC's David Shuster among others in the liberal media in knee-jerk fashion falsely accused O'Keefe, the ACORN-busting journalist who broke open the corruption at the so-called community organizing group, of "wiretapping" Mary Landrieu's office. That was a false charge since that is not what James O'Keefe and his compadres were charged with.

Can you say EGG ON FACE? Here's a blog from Newsbusters that records the exchange:

A spokesperson for MSNBC told Politico today that the channel's brass has reprimanded David Shuster for derisive tweets he directed at James O'Keefe Tuesday.

Within hours, he had retracted portions of his tweeted comments on air during an interview with Andrew Breitbart.This humble blogger documented the Twitter exchange yesterday, and pointed out that Shuster was much quicker to assume O'Keefe's guilt than he was the guilt of Major Nidal Hasan, the shooter at Fort Hood.

“The comments were inappropriate. We have talked to David about them," said the MSNBC spokesperson, referring to a series of tweets that included this one: "a) you are not a journalist b) the truth is you intended to tap her phones c) it's a felony d) you will go to prison."

Shuster retracted his accusation that O'Keefe had attempted to tap the phones in Sen. Mary Landrieu's office on his show this afternoon after Breitbart blasted Shuster for his false accusations.

SHUSTER: James O'Keefe and his friends were totally insane. Were they?

BREITBART: Well, they were totally insane as broken on MSNBC in which you guys slandered him by saying that he was charged with wiretapping and that's factually incorrect, so I'm waiting for MSNBC to retract that information. You've already been reprimanded today for your tweets in which you convicted James O'Keefe. You granted the pantybomber and Major Hasan...

[crosstalk]SHUSTER: No, Andrew 'cause we're going off topic, you're not answering my question. The key issue is fine, I should not have used the word that it was wiretapping. I should have used the word that the federal prosecutors used in their criminal complaint, for the purpose of willfully and maliciously interfering with the telephone system operated and controlled by the United States...

[crosstalk]BREITBART: Are you going to retract it?

SHUSTER: Sure, I retract, I should not have used the word wiretapping.

Breitbart wrote today at Big Journalism before his appearance, "How much do you want to bet David Shuster’s incomprehensible behavior and MSNBC’s rush to convict James O’Keefe will be a subject at the next Comcast shareholders’ meeting?"

Well, at least Shuster has retracted his false accusations, even if it did take a reprimand from his boss and some pushing from Breitbart. Others in the media have yet to do so.

Is anyone surprised there has been a rush to judgment? Even here on AFF?

[Sam]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

...
Is anyone surprised there has been a rush to judgment? Even here on AFF?

Well, for starters

who watches MSNBC?

And

who believes anything on MSNBC?

[deacon blues]

I would bet some of our BO defenders here watch MSNBC. Also, MSNBC is not the only media source who jumped on the bandwagon to lynch O'Keefe before the facts were completely known. The retractions have yet to come forth from these outlets.

Believe it, if it was Michael Moore being arrested and mislabeled, these guys would be crying foul. This is all about killing the messenger cause the message is hated.