Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > The Newsroom > Political Talk
Facebook

Notices

Political Talk Political News


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-31-2010, 11:41 AM
deacon blues deacon blues is offline
Pride of the Neighborhood


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,166
Mis-Statements of the Union

Another great editorial about last week's State of the Union Address.

Quote:
Mis-Statements of the Union
By Rich Lowry

Justice Samuel Alito let a pained expression pass his face and muttered, "Not true." His reaction to Pres. Barack Obama's demagogic attack on the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision aptly summed up the entire State of the Union address.

Obama warned that the decision striking down restrictions on corporate spending opened "the floodgates for special interests - including foreign corporations - to spend without limit in our elections." But the court explicitly left untouched a statute that bans election spending by foreign corporations, even "indirectly." There isn't even a "loophole" for U.S. subsidiaries of foreign firms, as the White House claimed in damage-control mode.

Since Massachusetts, the Left has been badly disoriented. It can't process the fact that the cradle of contemporary liberalism elected a Republican in a contest that was a referendum on health care. So, it has thrown up a thick cloud of rationalizations and delusion from which Obama emerged briefly to man his teleprompters before the nation.

He spoke for more than an hour, but the quick gloss might have been, "It's not my fault, and please ignore your lying eyes." Obama did everything in the speech - reach out to the middle class, feel people's pain, try to recapture the stirring magic of past oratory - except acknowledge what people dislike about his agenda and recalibrate accordingly.
Obama noted that we had a budget surplus of more than $200 billion in 2000, and a deficit of more than $1 trillion before he took office. It's true that the fiscal picture deteriorated dramatically with the recession and the Troubled Asset Relief Program, prior to Obama's ascension. But Obama's historic spending spree and ever-growing entitlements are what create the current $1 trillion deficits as far as the eye can see.

As an antidote, he now wants a three-year spending freeze on about 13 percent of the federal budget. This portion of the budget has seen an almost 20 percent increase during the past two years, not including gigantic boosts in the stimulus bill. The freeze is supposed to save $15 billion next year, but Obama called in his address for a new "jobs bill" that, in the House, has a price tag of another $150 billion. The freeze, in other words, is a simulacrum of fiscal restraint painted in red ink.

So alarmed is Obama by the spiraling debt that he committed to the bold step of naming a bipartisan commission. Of course, nothing's stopping Obama from proposing a budget that puts us on a more sustainable path. He is, after all, president of the United States. (You can tell by his stately and impressive teleprompters.)

But Obama has another priority - namely, passing a new health-care entitlement. He attributed its difficulties to his failure to explain it "more clearly." The real problem is that he can't explain it more honestly.

He said in his address that the bill would "preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan" - even though the Congressional Budget Office says millions will lose their current employer-provided coverage. He said it would reduce premiums for millions - when it will increase premiums for millions of others. He maintained that the CBO estimates it will reduce the deficit by "as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades" - but even the CBO considers the assumptions behind that estimate flimsy. It isn't that people haven't heard all this before from Obama; it's that they don't believe it. This is what Obama refers to as "a deficit of trust."

To heal it, he plugged for more lobbyist disclosure. Is that going to stop the White House from, say, cutting deals to give unions special exemptions from taxes? Obama must have a truly audacious faith in the forgetfulness and credulity of the public. The president has a reality problem.

He's crafted a fantasy universe where he and his friends can live unperturbed by our center-right country, comforted by just-so stories. The rest of us can only, like Justice Alito, crinkle our noses and mutter, "Not true."
__________________

‎When a newspaper posed the question, "What's Wrong with the World?" G. K. Chesterton reputedly wrote a brief letter in response: "Dear Sirs: I am. Sincerely Yours, G. K. Chesterton." That is the attitude of someone who has grasped the message of Jesus.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-01-2010, 06:42 PM
Jermyn Davidson's Avatar
Jermyn Davidson Jermyn Davidson is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In His Hands
Posts: 13,914
Re: Mis-Statements of the Union

So the only thing he was mistaken about was the fact that foreign entities can't contribute to political causes in America?


Or can they and they just can't contribute to political campaigns?

If the 2nd sentence is true, then even I can see loop holes to get around that.


What the SC did was open the floodgates even wider in allowing our elections to be bought by the highest bidder.


Do you disagree with this assesment?
__________________
"The choices we make reveal the true nature of our character."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-02-2010, 07:14 AM
n david n david is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17,807
Re: Mis-Statements of the Union

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson View Post
So the only thing he was mistaken about was the fact that foreign entities can't contribute to political causes in America?

Or can they and they just can't contribute to political campaigns?

If the 2nd sentence is true, then even I can see loop holes to get around that.

What the SC did was open the floodgates even wider in allowing our elections to be bought by the highest bidder.

Do you disagree with this assesment?
Yes.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Statements of Faith Sherri Fellowship Hall 32 01-19-2016 03:33 PM
Profound Statements Sam Fellowship Hall 8 02-10-2009 01:38 PM
The Two Dumbest Statements in Political History deacon blues Political Talk 5 10-12-2008 07:06 PM
Does these statements ring true to you? mizpeh Fellowship Hall 3 06-01-2008 05:40 AM
Ann Coulter's Statements JaneEyre Political Talk 53 02-03-2008 06:14 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.