Paterson never saw it coming……

coadie · #1 10-22-2009, 02:20 PM

Obama sliced pay for companies he boosted. We have no idea what gives him the authority

Gov Patterson in New York just got a billion less tax revenue because of this. When it is over, it will cost the state several billion more. Unintended consequences? No. It is intentional blindness to consequences. Remember executives have contracts for key people. Obama breaks these contracts by royal edict.

Actually with Lewis from BAC, they forced him to buy Merril and this month asked him to refund his pay for this year. In other words, he doesn't get minimum wage. Obama orders criminal breech of contracts.

Sam · #2 10-22-2009, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coadie

Obama sliced pay for companies he boosted. We have no idea what gives him the authority

Gov Patterson in New York just got a billion less tax revenue because of this. When it is over, it will cost the state several billion more. Unintended consequences? No. It is intentional blindness to consequences. Remember executives have contracts for key people. Obama breaks these contracts by royal edict.

Actually with Lewis from BAC, they forced him to buy Merril and this month asked him to refund his pay for this year. In other words, he doesn't get minimum wage. Obama orders criminal breech of contracts.

He can do it

cuz he da prez

Baron1710 · #3 10-22-2009, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coadie

Obama sliced pay for companies he boosted. We have no idea what gives him the authority

Gov Patterson in New York just got a billion less tax revenue because of this. When it is over, it will cost the state several billion more. Unintended consequences? No. It is intentional blindness to consequences. Remember executives have contracts for key people. Obama breaks these contracts by royal edict.

Actually with Lewis from BAC, they forced him to buy Merril and this month asked him to refund his pay for this year. In other words, he doesn't get minimum wage. Obama orders criminal breech of contracts.

There is no such thing!!!

Breach of contract is civil and NEVER criminal.

Where do you get this stuff?

coadie · #4 10-22-2009, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

There is no such thing!!!

Breach of contract is civil and NEVER criminal.

Where do you get this stuff?

You need to stick with divorce. Obama is involved with the fraudulent rescision of contract to which neither he nor his minions are a party.

God also hates dishonesty

Non payment of contracturally agreed on child support is a breach which can result in contemp and jail. Have any law books?

Walks_in_islam · #5 10-23-2009, 02:24 AM

I am quite sure you would have no idea what to do with an actual book that contains actual facts. (actual factual book LOL) What planet were you on when a court-ordered child support obligation became a "mutually agreed contract?"

Non-payment of child support is a criminal offense (disclaimer: most states) It became thus when enforcement under the civil system was determined to be a joke.

YOU should stick to "soft skills" that require no thinking or action like listening to and taking notes on your client's problems while making no other measurable or discernable difference. Doing nothing at least prevents you from looking as foolish as you do when you make the effort to take the misguided action of typing your silly thoughts on this board.

Baron1710 · #6 10-23-2009, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coadie

You need to stick with divorce. Obama is involved with the fraudulent rescision of contract to which neither he nor his minions are a party.

God also hates dishonesty

Non payment of contracturally agreed on child support is a breach which can result in contemp and jail. Have any law books?

Ok some lessons for you. First, not paying contractually agreed upon child support is NOT a criminal offense. If a couple agree on child support the other party doesn't pay it in a contract, that is without a court order, the only thing the other party can do is go to court to enforce the contract. At this time the court ORDERS child support. If some one doesn't pay child support then they are in contempt and speaking of of court. Contempt can get you jail time but that had nothing to do with a contract it has to do with disobeying a court order.

Again I tell you there is no such thing as a criminal breach of contract.

BTW, I have plenty of law books, and you should stick to what you know. What is that anyway?

coadie · #7 10-23-2009, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam

I am quite sure you would have no idea what to do with an actual book that contains actual facts. (actual factual book LOL) What planet were you on when a court-ordered child support obligation became a "mutually agreed contract?" Non-payment of child support is a criminal offense (disclaimer: most states) It became thus when enforcement under the civil system was determined to be a joke. YOU should stick to "soft skills" that require no thinking or action like listening to and taking notes on your client's problems while making no other measurable or discernable difference. Doing nothing at least prevents you from looking as foolish as you do when you make the effort to take the misguided action of typing your silly thoughts on this board.

divorce courts in America. It is where the marriage contract/ covenant and agreemenst are shredded.
Divorce lawyers Fellowship and thow marriages to the lions.

Marriage is for the most part an oral contract. A wedding has witness to the contract. Oral contracts are enforceable. In divorce an agreement is reached under which most times one of the parties agrees under duress. It is not free will. Savages charge a couple hundered dollars an hour to shredd these agreements.
Even "uncontested" or "friendly" divorces include lying.

Love honor and cherish till death do us part is declared to be not true.

It is sad that after a father for the most times, has spent 10,000 dollars to much on lawyers and then can't pay child support and is called deadbeat dad. The lawyers got his money. The mom would be less stressed if she hadn't had 10 to 20 thousand taken from her called Legal fees.

Divorce and gay marriage are destroying America from within.

Baron1710 · #8 10-23-2009, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coadie

divorce courts in America. It is where the marriage contract/ covenant and agreemenst are shredded.
Divorce lawyers Fellowship and thow marriages to the lions.

Marriage is for the most part an oral contract. A wedding has witness to the contract. Oral contracts are enforceable. In divorce an agreement is reached under which most times one of the parties agrees under duress. It is not free will. Savages charge a couple hundered dollars an hour to shredd these agreements.
Even "uncontested" or "friendly" divorces include lying.

Love honor and cherish till death do us part is declared to be not true.

It is sad that after a father for the most times, has spent 10,000 dollars to much on lawyers and then can't pay child support and is called deadbeat dad. The lawyers got his money. The mom would be less stressed if she hadn't had 10 to 20 thousand taken from her called Legal fees.

Divorce and gay marriage are destroying America from within.

The ignorance of this post is amazing. Parties do not agree under duress, often times these marriages have been shredded by one of the parties and that is why they see an attorney.

So it was me who shredded the marriage of the lady yesterday whose husband beat her so bad that she had a miscarriage? He had already violated the conditions of marriage, when we walked into court.

You run on and on about things you know nothing about. Stick to copying and pasting, you don't do so well on your own.

coadie · #9 10-23-2009, 01:46 PM

"... the Constitution allows for many things, but what it does not allow is the most revealing. The so-called Founders did not allow for economic freedom. While political freedom is supposedly a cornerstone of the document, the distribution of wealth is not even mentioned. While many believed that the new Constitution gave them liberty, it instead fitted them with the shackles of hypocrisy."

Obama's college thesis
http://pajamasmedia.com/michaelledee...as-his-doubts/

coadie · #10 10-23-2009, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron1710

The ignorance of this post is amazing. Parties do not agree under duress, often times these marriages have been shredded by one of the parties and that is why they see an attorney.

So it was me who shredded the marriage of the lady yesterday whose husband beat her so bad that she had a miscarriage? He had already violated the conditions of marriage, when we walked into court.

You run on and on about things you know nothing about. Stick to copying and pasting, you don't do so well on your own.

A long time friend of mine mentiond one divorce case that had built up to 200 motions being heard.

That is a lot of money to get revenge.

Vengeance is mione i will repay saith the LORD.

A TRSO works for violence. Restraining orders are not very complex if one party is hurt. Big money in the marrrigae shredding industries. Hollywood brings that around.
Jesus can restore marriages.
In psychology we ask "what is the presenting problem"

The problem is marriage involving non Christians.